IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p10678-d899218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Historic Cities within the Context of Sustainable Development and Revitalization: The Case of the Walled City North Nicosia

Author

Listed:
  • Mustafa Eyyamoğlu

    (Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Engineering, Bahçeşehir Cyprus University, Nicosia 99200, North Cyprus, Mersin 10, Turkey)

  • Ayten Özsavaş Akçay

    (Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Near East University, Nicosia 99138, North Cyprus, Mersin 10, Turkey)

Abstract

The City of Nicosia contains cultural heritage from different periods of history. Over time, due to user damage, illegal constructions, and abandonment, Nicosia has faced the danger of deterioration in its morphology and the loss of its original identity. With the recent strategic planning, the city of Nicosia has started to be revived. Within the scope of revitalization works, original or re-functional use projects are carried out on existing structures. Revitalization projects in historical cities should be implemented within the framework of sustainable development. In this study, the Arabahmet and Karamanzade regions of Nicosia were selected as the focus of the research. The research aims to assess revitalization works in selected zones within the framework of sustainable development. Three methodologies were followed in the research process: Theoretical, analytical, and practical approaches. As the first step in the theoretical approach, sustainable development was emphasized in historical cities and Nicosia City. Through an analytical approach, a current analysis of Nicosia city was made. In addition, in the practical approach, data highlighting the physical condition and architectural heritage of the regions were collected. In the practical assessment stage, data obtained within the scope of sustainable development and the revitalization works that can be applied in historical cities have been evaluated for the city of Nicosia. Analysis was made according to the data for the regions selected in line with the social, cultural, environmental, and economic criteria, which are the four pillars of sustainable development. In the last stage, the findings and discussion section, the direction of the revitalization works in the regions was assessed. Research reveals that the revitalization works carried out in the region are not fully addressed within the scope of sustainable development. The study reveals that it is essential for the sustainability of the conservation process of the local community.

Suggested Citation

  • Mustafa Eyyamoğlu & Ayten Özsavaş Akçay, 2022. "Assessment of Historic Cities within the Context of Sustainable Development and Revitalization: The Case of the Walled City North Nicosia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10678-:d:899218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10678/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10678/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicoleta Mateoc-Sîrb & Simona Albu & Ciprian Rujescu & Ramona Ciolac & Eugenia Țigan & Oana Brînzan & Camelia Mănescu & Teodor Mateoc & Ioana Anda Milin, 2022. "Sustainable Tourism Development in the Protected Areas of Maramureș, Romania: Destinations with High Authenticity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Esad Muminović & Uroš Radosavljević & Džemila Beganović, 2020. "Strategic Planning and Management Model for the Regeneration of Historic Urban Landscapes: The Case of Historic Center of Novi Pazar in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-33, February.
    3. Hansjörg Drewello & Nina Kulawik, 2022. "Energiebunker Hamburg—Ecological and Economic Sustainability of a War Relic?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Klaudia Nowicka, 2022. "The Heritage Given: Cultural Landscape and Heritage of the Vistula Delta Mennonites as Perceived by the Contemporary Residents of the Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Silvia Santini & Vittoria Borghese & Mario Micheli & Erick Orellana Paz, 2022. "Sustainable Recovery of Architectural Heritage: The Experience of a Worksite School in San Salvador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Alicja Gonia & Aleksandra Jezierska-Thöle, 2022. "Sustainable Tourism in Cities—Nature Reserves as a ‘New’ City Space for Nature-Based Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Ahmed Mohamed Shehata, 2022. "Current Trends in Urban Heritage Conservation: Medieval Historic Arab City Centers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-30, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandru Bogdan & Dorina Chambre & Dana Maria Copolovici & Tudor Bungau & Constantin C. Bungau & Lucian Copolovici, 2022. "Heritage Building Preservation in the Process of Sustainable Urban Development: The Case of Brasov Medieval City, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Wojciech Terlikowski, 2022. "Problems and Technical Issues in the Diagnosis, Conservation, and Rehabilitation of Structures of Historical Wooden Buildings with a Focus on Wooden Historic Buildings in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-31, December.
    3. Carmen García-Peña & Moneyba González-Medina & Jose Manuel Diaz-Sarachaga, 2021. "Assessment of the Governance Dimension in the Frame of the 2030 Agenda: Evidence from 100 Spanish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Tamara Lukić & Ivana Blešić & Tatjana Pivac & Milka Bubalo Živković & Bojan Đerčan & Sanja Kovačić & Marija Cimbaljević & Dajana Bjelajac, 2022. "Urban Image at the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic, Case Study Novi Sad (Serbia)," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Ziyu Jia & Yan Jiao & Wei Zhang & Zheng Chen, 2022. "Rural Tourism Competitiveness and Development Mode, a Case Study from Chinese Township Scale Using Integrated Multi-Source Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Deniz Ikiz Kaya & Nadia Pintossi & Gamze Dane, 2021. "An Empirical Analysis of Driving Factors and Policy Enablers of Heritage Adaptive Reuse within the Circular Economy Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Ahmed Mohamed Shehata, 2023. "Sustainable-Oriented Development for Urban Interface of Historic Centers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Cheng-Hsiang Yang & Yikang Sun & Po-Hsien Lin & Rungtai Lin, 2022. "Sustainable Development in Local Culture Industries: A Case Study of Taiwan Aboriginal Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Hansjörg Drewello, 2022. "Towards a Theory of Local Energy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Alina-Petronela Haller & Georgia-Daniela Tacu Hârșan, 2023. "Longitudinal Analysis of Sustainable Tourism Potential of the Black Sea Riparian States Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-24, February.
    11. Igor Trišić & Donatella Privitera & Snežana Štetić & Marko D. Petrović & Milan M. Radovanović & Marija Maksin & Dario Šimičević & Sara Stanić Jovanović & Dobrila Lukić, 2022. "Sustainable Tourism to the Part of Transboundary UNESCO Biosphere Reserve “Mura-Drava-Danube”. A Case of Serbia, Croatia and Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, May.
    12. Ramona Ciolac & Tiberiu Iancu & Gabriela Popescu & Tabita Adamov & Andrea Feher & Sorin Stanciu, 2022. "Smart Tourist Village—An Entrepreneurial Necessity for Maramures Rural Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-27, July.
    13. Mihai F. Băcilă & Raluca Ciornea & Luiza M. Souca & Alexandra M. Drule, 2022. "Content Analysis on Sustainability Dimensions in DMOs’ Social Media Videos Advertising the World’s Most Visited Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    14. Mihail Ovidiu Tănase & Puiu Nistoreanu & Răzvan Dina & Bogdan Georgescu & Virgil Nicula & Cosmin Nicolae Mirea, 2023. "Generation Z Romanian Students’ Relation with Rural Tourism—An Exploratory Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
    15. Batara Surya & Seri Suriani & Firman Menne & Herminawaty Abubakar & Muhammad Idris & Emil Salim Rasyidi & Hasanuddin Remmang, 2021. "Community Empowerment and Utilization of Renewable Energy: Entrepreneurial Perspective for Community Resilience Based on Sustainable Management of Slum Settlements in Makassar City, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-36, March.
    16. Mimica R. Milošević & Dušan M. Milošević & Ana D. Stanojević & Dragan M. Stević & Dušan J. Simjanović, 2021. "Fuzzy and Interval AHP Approaches in Sustainable Management for the Architectural Heritage in Smart Cities," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-29, February.
    17. Marko Nikolić & Boško Drobnjak & Irena Kuletin Ćulafić, 2020. "The Possibilities of Preservation, Regeneration and Presentation of Industrial Heritage: The Case of Old Mint “A.D.” on Belgrade Riverfront," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-36, June.
    18. Hana Sáblíková, 2023. "The Role of Cultural Life in a Small Town in Eastern Bohemia, and Its Potential Development of Cultural Tourism," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, March.
    19. Silvia Santini & Vittoria Borghese & Carlo Baggio, 2023. "HBIM-Based Decision-Making Approach for Sustainable Diagnosis and Conservation of Historical Timber Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    20. Martina Bosone & Francesca Ciampa, 2021. "Human-Centred Indicators (HCI) to Regenerate Vulnerable Cultural Heritage and Landscape towards a Circular City: From the Bronx (NY) to Ercolano (IT)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-36, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10678-:d:899218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.