IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9357-d876387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Permeability of Waterfronts—Contemporary Approach in Designing Urban Blue Spaces

Author

Listed:
  • Anastasiia Dubinina

    (Department of Urban Design and Regional Planning, Faculty of Architecture, Gdańsk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland)

  • Aleksandra Wawrzyńska

    (Department of Transport and Logistic, Gdynia Maritime University, 81-225 Gdynia, Poland)

  • Karolina A. Krośnicka

    (Department of Urban Design and Regional Planning, Faculty of Architecture, Gdańsk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland)

Abstract

The constant struggle with rising sea levels and flood hazards has resulted in the change of the paradigm in shaping urban waterfronts towards increasing their permeability and creation of urban blue spaces. The aim of the paper was to indicate a new approach in designing public spaces at the sea–land interface by presenting a comparative study of the design solutions used in case of the four selected case studies: the Sea Organs in Zadar (Croatia), Norwegian National Opera and Ballet in Oslo (Norway), the Coastal Public Sauna in Helsinki (Finland) and Tel Aviv’s Central Promenade (Israel). The studied examples take into account the permeability of waterfronts (understood as a feature of the edge between water–land consisting of being soft and permeable). The authors decided to use the case study method as the main approach, analyzing such elements as: the site’s location and urban context, features of urban and architectural design (with usage of graphic methods and a qualitative description), and the land–water edge type (defined according the existing typologies). The study proved, that in recent years the designers have started to replace the vertical quay walls, which create a “rigid” water–land border, with multi-level solutions having a high degree of permeability for water.

Suggested Citation

  • Anastasiia Dubinina & Aleksandra Wawrzyńska & Karolina A. Krośnicka, 2022. "Permeability of Waterfronts—Contemporary Approach in Designing Urban Blue Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9357-:d:876387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9357/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9357/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Notteboom, Theo, 2016. "The adaptive capacity of container ports in an era of mega vessels: The case of upstream seaports Antwerp and Hamburg," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 295-309.
    2. Khalil Bachir Aouissi & Said Madani & Vincent Baptist, 2021. "Morphological Evolution of the Port‐City Interface of Algiers (16th Century to the Present)," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 119-135.
    3. Carola Hein, 2021. "Port City Porosity: Boundaries, Flows, and Territories," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 1-9.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Qianyu & Xu, Hang & Wall, Ronald S & Stavropoulos, Spyridon, 2017. "Building a bridge between port and city: Improving the urban competitiveness of port cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 120-133.
    2. Anurag Kulshrestha & Abhishek Yadav & Himanshu Sharma & Shikha Suman, 2024. "A deep learning‐based multivariate decomposition and ensemble framework for container throughput forecasting," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(7), pages 2685-2704, November.
    3. Jūratė Liebuvienė & Kristina Čižiūnienė, 2021. "Comparative Analysis of Ports on the Eastern Baltic Sea Coast," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-29, December.
    4. César Ducruet & Hidekazu Itoh & Justin Berli, 2020. "Urban gravity in the global container shipping network," Post-Print halshs-02588449, HAL.
    5. João Pedro Costa & Maria J. Andrade & Francesca Dal Cin, 2023. "The (Re)Industrialised Waterfront as a “Fluid Territory”: The Case of Lisbon and the Tagus Estuary," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 363-375.
    6. Ducruet, César & Itoh, Hidekazu, 2022. "The spatial determinants of innovation diffusion: Evidence from global shipping networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    7. Theo Notteboom & Larissa van der Lugt & Niels van Saase & Steve Sel & Kris Neyens, 2020. "The Role of Seaports in Green Supply Chain Management: Initiatives, Attitudes, and Perspectives in Rotterdam, Antwerp, North Sea Port, and Zeebrugge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, February.
    8. Bergqvist, Rickard & Monios, Jason, 2021. "Drivers for migration of an intermodal network hub from a port to an inland terminal," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Bouchery, Yann & Woxenius, Johan & Fransoo, Jan C., 2020. "Identifying the market areas of port-centric logistics and hinterland intermodal transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 599-611.
    10. Ducruet, César, 2020. "The geography of maritime networks: A critical review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    11. Anqiang Huang & Xinjun Liu & Changrui Rao & Yi Zhang & Yifan He, 2022. "A New Container Throughput Forecasting Paradigm under COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Enrico Tommarchi, 2025. "Waterfront Redevelopment Five Decades Later: An Updated Typology and Research Agenda," Ocean and Society, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2.
    13. Karel Van den Berghe & Erik Louw & Filip Pliakis & Tom Daamen, 2023. "When “port-out – city-in” becomes a strategy: is the port–city interface conflict in Amsterdam an observation or a self-fulfilling prophecy?," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(2), pages 330-350, June.
    14. Ducruet, César & Guerrero, David, 2022. "Inland cities, maritime gateways, and international trade," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    15. César Ducruet & Sylvain Cuyala & Ali El Hosni, 2018. "Maritime networks as systems of cities: The long-term interdependencies between global shipping flows and urban development (1890–2010)," Post-Print halshs-01676756, HAL.
    16. Theo E. Notteboom & Hercules E. Haralambides, 2020. "Port management and governance in a post-COVID-19 era: quo vadis?," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(3), pages 329-352, September.
    17. César Ducruet & Hidekazu Itoh, 2022. "Spatial Network Analysis of Container Port Operations: The Case of Ship Turnaround Times," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 883-902, December.
    18. João Pedro Costa & Maria J. Andrade & Francesca Dal Cin, 2023. "The (Re)Industrialised Waterfront as a “Fluid Territory”: The Case of Lisbon and the Tagus Estuary," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 363-375.
    19. Truong Ngoc Cuong & Le Ngoc Bao Long & Hwan-Seong Kim & Sam-Sang You, 2023. "Data analytics and throughput forecasting in port management systems against disruptions: a case study of Busan Port," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(1), pages 61-89, March.
    20. Li, Shan & Haralambides, Hercules & Zeng, Qingcheng, 2022. "Economic forces shaping the evolution of integrated port systems - The case of the container port system of China's Pearl River Delta," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9357-:d:876387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.