IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9010-d869317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Legibility Efficacy of Historical Neighborhoods in Creating a Cognitive Map for Citizens

Author

Listed:
  • Reza Askarizad

    (The Center for Modern Chinese City Studies, Institute of Urban Development, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)

  • Jinliao He

    (The Center for Modern Chinese City Studies, Institute of Urban Development, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)

  • Elham Mehrinejad Khotbehsara

    (Faculty of Health Engineering and Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba 4350, Australia)

Abstract

Nowadays, historical neighborhoods in Iran are in a state of decay due to the lack of spatial legibility with respect to their organic spatial layout. Hence, the level of interaction among people and their perception of the environment has gradually diminished. Historical neighborhoods no longer possess their former prosperity and function, and citizens prefer to inhabit neighborhoods with newer configurations to meet their demands. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of the spatial legibility of historical neighborhoods in creating a suitable cognitive map for citizens. Quantitative and qualitative methods were applied using a questionnaire and simulation test instruments. In addition, in order to analyze the spatial configuration of the target areas, the Space Syntax method was implemented using Depthmap 10. The findings indicated that landmarks and navigation signs were identified as the most important factors affecting legibility from the viewpoint of users. Furthermore, the correlation between integration and connectivity illustrated that the studied areas possessed poor spatial legibility due to the organic texture of their spatial configurations. Accordingly, solutions such as enhancing the interaction between highly integrated streets and identified landmarks were emphasized to ameliorate the legibility of these spaces. The present study contributes to sustainable urban design with respect to the rejuvenation of historical districts by proposing a set of pragmatic alterations of urban spatial configurations. This research may be fruitful for urban designers, planners and managers seeking to revitalize historical neighborhoods.

Suggested Citation

  • Reza Askarizad & Jinliao He & Elham Mehrinejad Khotbehsara, 2022. "The Legibility Efficacy of Historical Neighborhoods in Creating a Cognitive Map for Citizens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9010-:d:869317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9010/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9010/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elek Pafka & Kim Dovey & Gideon DPA Aschwanden, 2020. "Limits of space syntax for urban design: Axiality, scale and sinuosity," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(3), pages 508-522, March.
    2. Yuqi Shi & Yi Zhang & Tao Wang & Chaoyang Li & Shengqiang Yuan, 2020. "The Effects of Ambient Illumination, Color Combination, Sign Height, and Observation Angle on the Legibility of Wayfinding Signs in Metro Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Justin B. Hollander & Ann Sussman & Alex Purdy Levering & Cara Foster-Karim, 2020. "Using Eye-Tracking to Understand Human Responses to Traditional Neighborhood Designs," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(5), pages 485-509, October.
    4. Zuoming Jiang & Yang Sun, 2022. "Exploring the Spatial Image of Traditional Villages from the Tourists’ Hand-Drawn Sketches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Justin B. Hollander & Alexandra Purdy & Andrew Wiley & Veronica Foster & Robert J.K. Jacob & Holly A. Taylor & Tad T. Brunyé, 2019. "Seeing the city: using eye-tracking technology to explore cognitive responses to the built environment," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 156-171, April.
    6. Negar Ahmadpoor & Alastair D. Smith & Tim Heath, 2021. "Rethinking legibility in the era of digital mobile maps: an empirical study," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 296-318, May.
    7. Kah-Wee Lee, 2014. "Feeling like a State: Design Guidelines and the Legibility of ‘Urban Experience’ in Singapore," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 138-154, January.
    8. Walid-Mahfoud Djenaihi & Noureddine Zemmouri & Moussadek Djenane & Akkelies van Nes, 2021. "Noise and Spatial Configuration in Biskra, Algeria—A Space Syntax Approach to Understand the Built Environment for Visually Impaired People," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Reza Askarizad & Jinliao He, 2022. "Perception of Spatial Legibility and Its Association with Human Mobility Patterns: An Empirical Assessment of the Historical Districts in Rasht, Iran," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Maria Sinou & Katerina Skalkou & Roumpini Perakaki & Sébastien Jacques & Zoe Kanetaki, 2023. "Holistic Strategies Based on Heritage, Environmental, Sensory Analysis and Mapping for Sustainable Coastal Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yue Peng & Hui Qiu & Xinlu Wang, 2023. "The Influence of Spatial Functions on the Public Space System of Traditional Settlements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Pauline McGuirk & Robyn Dowling, 2021. "Urban governance dispositifs: cohering diverse ecologies of urban energy governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(4), pages 759-780, June.
    3. Raquel Agost-Felip & María José Ruá & Fatiha Kouidmi, 2021. "An Inclusive Model for Assessing Age-Friendly Urban Environments in Vulnerable Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-29, July.
    4. Reza Askarizad & Jinliao He, 2022. "Perception of Spatial Legibility and Its Association with Human Mobility Patterns: An Empirical Assessment of the Historical Districts in Rasht, Iran," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Kah-Wee Lee, 2014. "Transforming Macau: Planning as Institutionalized Informality and the Spatial Dynamics of Hypercompetition," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(11), pages 2622-2637, November.
    6. Liang Sun & Yao Xu & Sijing Teng & Bo Wang & Ming Li & Shanmin Ding, 2022. "Research into the Visual Saliency of Guide Signs in an Underground Commercial Street Based on an Eye-Movement Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Isabelle Soares & Claudia Yamu & Gerd Weitkamp, 2020. "The Relationship between the Spatial Configuration and the Fourth Sustainable Dimension Creativity in University Campuses: The Case Study of Zernike Campus, Groningen, The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Donald McNeill, 2022. "BOTANIC URBANISM: The Technopolitics of Controlled Environments in Singapore's Gardens by the Bay," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 220-234, March.
    9. Shiran Geng & Hing-Wah Chau & Elmira Jamei & Zora Vrcelj, 2022. "Understanding the Street Layout of Melbourne’s Chinatown as an Urban Heritage Precinct in a Grid System Using Space Syntax Methods and Field Observation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, October.
    10. Ammar Al-Sharaa & Mastura Adam & Amer Siddiq Amer Nordin & Riyadh Mundher & Ameer Alhasan, 2022. "Assessment of Wayfinding Performance in Complex Healthcare Facilities: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Xiang Gao & Zao Li & Xia Sun, 2023. "Relevance between Tourist Behavior and the Spatial Environment in Huizhou Traditional Villages—A Case Study of Pingshan Village, Yi County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, March.
    12. Wenying Zhang & Lian Zhu & Zixuan Zhang & Zhan Zhang & Linjun Lu, 2020. "A Sustainable Evaluation Method for a Tourism Public Wayfinding System: A Case Study of Shanghai Disneyland Resort," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Tianyang Ge & Wenjun Hou & Yang Xiao, 2023. "Study on the Regeneration of City Centre Spatial Structure Pedestrianisation Based on Space Syntax: Case Study on 21 City Centres in the UK," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-26, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9010-:d:869317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.