IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8893-d867453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Landscape Cognition in the Era of Mobility of Things: The Notion of Platform Urbanism and Taskscape

Author

Listed:
  • Li Won Kim

    (The Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

Abstract

The mobility of things is becoming increasingly significant in modern cities owing to the ‘untact’ phenomena to sustain people’s lives during the COVID-19 pandemic and adopt platform urbanism. This study argues that the feature of mobility had a significant impact on the formation of modern cities’ landscapes. We examine the necessity for a distinct perspective on the urban landscape based on the mobility of things. Consequently, a literature research on mobility and landscape concepts and fieldwork such as shadowing and contextual interviews was conducted. The findings suggest that the notion of taskscape can be used as the interaction of actors within mobility tends to shape the landscape of the mobility of things. It discusses the re-recognition of the landscape concept according to the phenomenon of the mobility of things, which is significant for future landscape research in sustainable urban planning. Landmarks also exhibit the qualities of a mobility scape that acquires a high-level image at a high speed and a navigation landscape that experiences space through a mobile map in the mobility of things. Further, platform urbanism allows for the implementation of the mobility of things’ landscape in both physical and virtual spaces, creating a virtual landscape in mobile applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Won Kim, 2022. "Landscape Cognition in the Era of Mobility of Things: The Notion of Platform Urbanism and Taskscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-12, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8893-:d:867453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8893/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8893/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Merriman & Lynne Pearce, 2017. "Mobility and the humanities," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 493-508, July.
    2. Katarzyna Turoń & Andrzej Kubik & Feng Chen, 2021. "When, What and How to Teach about Electric Mobility? An Innovative Teaching Concept for All Stages of Education: Lessons from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liliana Andrei & Oana Luca & Florian Gaman, 2022. "Insights from User Preferences on Automated Vehicles: Influence of Socio-Demographic Factors on Value of Time in Romania Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Hui Zheng & Baohong He & Mingwei He & Jinghui Guo, 2022. "Impact of Urban Spatial Transformation on the Mobility of Commuters with Different Transportation Modes in China: Evidence from Kunming 2011–2016," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Mei-Hui Peng & Bireswar Dutta, 2022. "Impact of Personality Traits and Information Privacy Concern on E-Learning Environment Adoption during COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Li Won Kim, 2022. "Challenges Facing the Delivery City Phenomenon after the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Eugène Loos & Maria Sourbati & Frauke Behrendt, 2020. "The Role of Mobility Digital Ecosystems for Age-Friendly Urban Public Transport: A Narrative Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Sehyun Tak & Sari Kim & Hwapyeong Yu & Donghoun Lee, 2022. "Analysis of Relationship between Road Geometry and Automated Driving Safety for Automated Vehicle-Based Mobility Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, February.
    7. Christopher W. H. Davis & Antonie J. Jetter & Philippe J. Giabbanelli, 2022. "Automatically Generating Scenarios from a Text Corpus: A Case Study on Electric Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Tomasz Matyja & Andrzej Kubik & Zbigniew Stanik, 2022. "Possibility to Use Professional Bicycle Computers for the Scientific Evaluation of Electric Bikes: Velocity, Cadence and Power Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Páraic Carroll, 2022. "Perceptions of Electric Scooters Prior to Legalisation: A Case Study of Dublin, Ireland, the ‘Final Frontier’ of Adopted E-Scooter Use in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-13, September.
    10. Georgia Ayfantopoulou & Josep Maria Salanova Grau & Zisis Maleas & Alexandros Siomos, 2022. "Micro-Mobility User Pattern Analysis and Station Location in Thessaloniki," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, May.
    11. Mei-Hui Peng & Bireswar Dutta, 2023. "The Mediating Effects of Innovativeness and System Usability on Students’ Personality Differences: Recommendations for E-Learning Platforms in the Post-Pandemic Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Rafael Fernandes Mosquim & Carlos Eduardo Keutenedjian Mady, 2022. "Performance and Efficiency Trade-Offs in Brazilian Passenger Vehicle Fleet," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, July.
    13. Elham Allahmoradi & Saeed Mirzamohammadi & Ali Bonyadi Naeini & Ali Maleki & Saleh Mobayen & Paweł Skruch, 2022. "Policy Instruments for the Improvement of Customers’ Willingness to Purchase Electric Vehicles: A Case Study in Iran," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    14. Guido Ala & Ilhami Colak & Gabriella Di Filippo & Rosario Miceli & Pietro Romano & Carla Silva & Stanimir Valtchev & Fabio Viola, 2021. "Electric Mobility in Portugal: Current Situation and Forecasts for Fuel Cell Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-23, November.
    15. Sujae Kim & Sangho Choo & Gyeongjae Lee & Sanghun Kim, 2022. "Predicting Demand for Shared E-Scooter Using Community Structure and Deep Learning Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, February.
    16. Nathasit Gerdsri & Komkrit Sivara & Chayoot Chatunawarat & Somnuek Jaroonjitsathian & Krissada Tundulyasaree, 2022. "Roadmap for Future Mobility Development Supporting Bangkok Urban Living in 2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8893-:d:867453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.