IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8426-d859347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Landslide Susceptibility by Coupling Spatial Data Analysis and Logistic Model

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Ganga

    (Dipartimento di Architettura, Design e Urbanistica, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Viale Piandanna n 4, 07100 Sassari, Italy)

  • Mario Elia

    (Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy)

  • Ersilia D’Ambrosio

    (Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy)

  • Simona Tripaldi

    (Department of Earth and Geo-Environmental Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy)

  • Gian Franco Capra

    (Dipartimento di Architettura, Design e Urbanistica, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Viale Piandanna n 4, 07100 Sassari, Italy)

  • Francesco Gentile

    (Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy)

  • Giovanni Sanesi

    (Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy)

Abstract

Landslides represent one of the most critical issues for landscape managers. They can cause injuries and loss of human life and damage properties and infrastructure. The spatial and temporal distribution of these detrimental events makes them almost unpredictable. Studies on landslide susceptibility assessment can significantly contribute to prioritizing critical risk zones. Further, landslide prevention and mitigation and the relative importance of the affecting drivers acquire even more significance in areas characterized by seismicity. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between a set of environmental variables and the occurrence of landslide events in an area of the Apulia Region (Italy). Logistic regression was applied to a landslide-prone area in the Apulia Region (Italy) to identify the main causative factors using a large dataset of environmental predictors (47). The results of this case study show that the logistic regression achieved a good performance, with an AUC (Area Under Curve) >70%. Therefore, the model developed would be a useful tool to define and assess areas for landslide occurrence and contribute to implementing risk mitigation strategy and land use policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Ganga & Mario Elia & Ersilia D’Ambrosio & Simona Tripaldi & Gian Franco Capra & Francesco Gentile & Giovanni Sanesi, 2022. "Assessing Landslide Susceptibility by Coupling Spatial Data Analysis and Logistic Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8426-:d:859347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8426/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8426/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Denis Nseka & Vincent Kakembo & Yazidhi Bamutaze & Frank Mugagga, 2019. "Analysis of topographic parameters underpinning landslide occurrence in Kigezi highlands of southwestern Uganda," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(2), pages 973-989, November.
    2. Dimitrios Myronidis & Charalambos Papageorgiou & Stavros Theophanous, 2016. "Landslide susceptibility mapping based on landslide history and analytic hierarchy process (AHP)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(1), pages 245-263, March.
    3. Dimitrios Myronidis & Charalambos Papageorgiou & Stavros Theophanous, 2016. "Landslide susceptibility mapping based on landslide history and analytic hierarchy process (AHP)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(1), pages 245-263, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Ganga & Mario Elia & Blaž Repe, 2023. "Applications of GIS and Remote Sensing in Soil Environment Monitoring," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-2, September.
    2. Xianmin Wang & Xinlong Zhang & Jia Bi & Xudong Zhang & Shiqiang Deng & Zhiwei Liu & Lizhe Wang & Haixiang Guo, 2022. "Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation Based on Potential Disaster Identification and Ensemble Learning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-26, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amin Salehpour Jam & Jamal Mosaffaie & Faramarz Sarfaraz & Samad Shadfar & Rouhangiz Akhtari, 2021. "GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid MCDM models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(1), pages 1025-1046, August.
    2. Gökhan Demir, 2018. "Landslide susceptibility mapping by using statistical analysis in the North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) on the northern part of Suşehri Town, Turkey," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(1), pages 133-154, May.
    3. Rui-Xuan Tang & E-Chuan Yan & Tao Wen & Xiao-Meng Yin & Wei Tang, 2021. "Comparison of Logistic Regression, Information Value, and Comprehensive Evaluating Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, March.
    4. Kamila Hodasová & Martin Bednarik, 2021. "Effect of using various weighting methods in a process of landslide susceptibility assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(1), pages 481-499, January.
    5. G. Sakkas & I. Misailidis & N. Sakellariou & V. Kouskouna & G. Kaviris, 2016. "Modeling landslide susceptibility in Greece: a weighted linear combination approach using analytic hierarchical process, validated with spatial and statistical analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(3), pages 1873-1904, December.
    6. Quynh Duy Bui & Hang Ha & Dong Thanh Khuc & Dinh Quoc Nguyen & Jason von Meding & Lam Phuong Nguyen & Chinh Luu, 2023. "Landslide susceptibility prediction mapping with advanced ensemble models: Son La province, Vietnam," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(2), pages 2283-2309, March.
    7. Cahio Guimarães Seabra Eiras & Juliana Ribeiro Gonçalves de Souza & Renata Delicio Andrade de Freitas & César Falcão Barella & Tiago Martins Pereira, 2021. "Discriminant analysis as an efficient method for landslide susceptibility assessment in cities with the scarcity of predisposition data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(2), pages 1427-1442, June.
    8. Emmanouil Psomiadis & Andreas Papazachariou & Konstantinos X. Soulis & Despoina-Simoni Alexiou & Ioannis Charalampopoulos, 2020. "Landslide Mapping and Susceptibility Assessment Using Geospatial Analysis and Earth Observation Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-26, April.
    9. Shengwu Qin & Shuangshuang Qiao & Jingyu Yao & Lingshuai Zhang & Xiaowei Liu & Xu Guo & Yang Chen & Jingbo Sun, 2022. "Establishing a GIS-based evaluation method considering spatial heterogeneity for debris flow susceptibility mapping at the regional scale," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(3), pages 2709-2738, December.
    10. Konstantinos, Ioannou & Georgios, Tsantopoulos & Garyfalos, Arabatzis, 2019. "A Decision Support System methodology for selecting wind farm installation locations using AHP and TOPSIS: Case study in Eastern Macedonia and Thrace region, Greece," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 232-246.
    11. Silvana Moragues & María Gabriela Lenzano & Mario Lanfri & Stella Moreiras & Esteban Lannutti & Luis Lenzano, 2021. "Analytic hierarchy process applied to landslide susceptibility mapping of the North Branch of Argentino Lake, Argentina," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(1), pages 915-941, January.
    12. Sara Beheshtifar, 2023. "Identification of landslide-prone zones using a GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis and region-growing algorithm in uncertain conditions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(2), pages 1475-1497, January.
    13. Masanori Kohno & Yuki Higuchi & Yusuke Ono, 2023. "Evaluating earthquake-induced widespread slope failure hazards using an AHP-GIS combination," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(2), pages 1485-1512, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8426-:d:859347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.