IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p6174-d819074.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recycling Potential Comparison of Mass Timber Constructions and Concrete Buildings: A Case Study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Qiming Sun

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Qiong Huang

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Zhuocheng Duan

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Anxiao Zhang

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

Abstract

The recycling potential (RP) indicates the ability of building materials to form a closed-loop material flow, that is, the material efficiency during its whole life cycle. Mass timber constructions and concrete buildings vary widely in RP, but the differences are difficult to calculate. This paper proposed a level-based scheme to compare the RP of mass timber and concrete buildings, and a BIM-Eco2soft-MS Excel workflow coupling Material Cycle Database and digital design tools were established to obtain information on building materials, resource consumption, and environmental impact for the RP calculation. Taking a residential building as an example, the difference in RP between mass timber and concrete at the material-level is firstly discussed. Then at the component-level, the RP of the wood structure component and concrete component is compared, and the optimization methods are proposed. Finally, the difference in RP between the mass timber building and reinforced concrete building at the building-level are illustrated. The results show that the RP of mass timber building is higher, and the disassembly ability is better. Within a 100-year service life, the RP of mass timber buildings is 73% and that of the reinforced concrete building is 34%. The total amount of material consumption and waste of the Variant CLT is 837,030 kg and 267,237 kg respectively, which is less than one-third of that of concrete buildings (3,458,488 kg; 958,145 kg). The Global Warming potential (GWP) of these two variants is −174.0 kgCO 2 /m 2 and 221.0 kgCO 2 /m 2 separately, indicating that the Variant CLT can realize negative carbon emissions and gain ecological benefits. A sensitivity analysis is conducted to explore the potential impacts of certain parameters on GWP and RP of buildings. The research can provide the reference for material selection, component design, and RP optimization of mass timber buildings. In addition, new ideas for assessing the potential of circularity as a design tool are proposed to support the transition towards a circular construction industry and to realize carbon neutrality.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiming Sun & Qiong Huang & Zhuocheng Duan & Anxiao Zhang, 2022. "Recycling Potential Comparison of Mass Timber Constructions and Concrete Buildings: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6174-:d:819074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6174/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6174/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul H. Brunner, 2011. "Urban Mining A Contribution to Reindustrializing the City," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 15(3), pages 339-341, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Yufeng & Yin, Xiaofei & Zhang, Qijun & Wang, Wei & Mu, Xianzhong, 2014. "The recycling of rare earths from waste tricolor phosphors in fluorescent lamps: A review of processes and technologies," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 21-31.
    2. A. S. M. Sazzad Parveg & Ramin Ordikhani-Seyedlar & Tejasvi Sharma & Scott K. Shaw & Albert Ratner, 2022. "A Recycling Pathway for Rare Earth Metals (REMs) from E-Waste through Co-Gasification with Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Carlos Mesta & Ramzy Kahhat & Sandra Santa‐Cruz, 2019. "Geospatial Characterization of Material Stock in the Residential Sector of a Latin‐American City," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 280-291, February.
    4. Augiseau, Vincent & Barles, Sabine, 2017. "Studying construction materials flows and stock: A review," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 153-164.
    5. Stephan Kampelmann, 2020. "Wood works: How local value chains based on urban forests contribute to place-based circular economy," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/308602, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    6. Karine Dufossé & Marine Marie-Charlotte & Vincent Augiseau & Thierry Henrion & Hayet Djelal, 2021. "Quantification and Environmental Assessment of Wood Ash from Biomass Power Plants: Case Study of Brittany Region in France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Volk, Rebekka & Müller, Richard & Reinhardt, Joachim & Schultmann, Frank, 2019. "An Integrated Material Flows, Stakeholders and Policies Approach to Identify and Exploit Regional Resource Potentials," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 292-320.
    8. Efstathios Kakkos & Felix Heisel & Dirk E. Hebel & Roland Hischier, 2020. "Towards Urban Mining—Estimating the Potential Environmental Benefits by Applying an Alternative Construction Practice. A Case Study from Switzerland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Damián Burneo & José M. Cansino & Rocio Yñiguez, 2020. "Environmental and Socioeconomic Impacts of Urban Waste Recycling as Part of Circular Economy. The Case of Cuenca (Ecuador)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, April.
    10. Oleksandr Galychyn & B.D. Fath & D. Wiedenhofer & E. Buonocore & P.P. Franzese, 2024. "An urban emergy footprint: Comparing supply- and use-extended input-output models for the case of Vienna, Austria," Post-Print hal-04507173, HAL.
    11. Meylan, Grégoire & Reck, Barbara K., 2017. "The anthropogenic cycle of zinc: Status quo and perspectives," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-10.
    12. Monika Kasina & Piotr Rafał Kowalski & Bartłomiej Kajdas & Marek Michalik, 2020. "Assessment of Valuable and Critical Elements Recovery Potential in Ashes from Processes of Solid Municipal Waste and Sewage Sludge Thermal Treatment," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Wallsten, Björn & Magnusson, Dick & Andersson, Simon & Krook, Joakim, 2015. "The economic conditions for urban infrastructure mining: Using GIS to prospect hibernating copper stocks," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 85-97.
    14. Schiller, Georg & Müller, Felix & Ortlepp, Regine, 2017. "Mapping the anthropogenic stock in Germany: Metabolic evidence for a circular economy," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 93-107.
    15. Honic Meliha & Kovacic Iva, 2020. "Model and data management issues in the integrated assessment of existing building stocks," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 2148-2157, January.
    16. Vincent Augiseau & Eunhye Kim, 2021. "Inflows and Outflows from Material Stocks of Buildings and Networks and their Space-Differentiated Drivers: The Case Study of the Paris Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, January.
    17. Kazançoglu, Yigit & Ada, Erhan & Ozturkoglu, Yucel & Ozbiltekin, Melisa, 2020. "Analysis of the barriers to urban mining for resource melioration in emerging economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    18. Bruno Moeremans & Michaël Dooms & Elvira Haezendonck, 2023. "Long-term analysis of traffic flows in European inland ports: implications for the port–city interface," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(2), pages 272-300, June.
    19. Colin M. Rose & Dan Bergsagel & Thibault Dufresne & Evi Unubreme & Tianyao Lyu & Philippe Duffour & Julia A. Stegemann, 2018. "Cross-Laminated Secondary Timber: Experimental Testing and Modelling the Effect of Defects and Reduced Feedstock Properties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6174-:d:819074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.