IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i6p3569-d522556.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vegetation Response to Goats Grazing Intensity in Semiarid Hilly Grassland of the Loess Plateau, Lanzhou, China

Author

Listed:
  • Hua Cheng

    (State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystem, Institute of Arid Agroecology, and School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Baocheng Jin

    (College of Animal Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Kai Luo

    (State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystem, Institute of Arid Agroecology, and School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Jiuying Pei

    (State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystem, Institute of Arid Agroecology, and School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Xueli Zhang

    (College of Water Conservancy Science & Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
    Yellow River Institute for Ecological Protection & Regional Coordinated Development, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

  • Yonghong Zhang

    (State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystem, Institute of Arid Agroecology, and School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Jiaqi Tang

    (State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystem, Institute of Arid Agroecology, and School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Qin Yang

    (College of Animal Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Guojun Sun

    (State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystem, Institute of Arid Agroecology, and School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

Abstract

Quantitatively estimating the grazing intensity (GI) effects on vegetation in semiarid hilly grassland of the Loess Plateau can help to develop safe utilization levels for natural grasslands, which is a necessity of maintaining livestock production and sustainable development of grasslands. Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), field vegetation data, and 181 days (one goat per day) of GPS tracking were combined to quantify the spatial pattern of GI, and its effects on the vegetation community structure. The spatial distribution of GI was uneven, with a mean value of 0.50 goats/ha, and 95% of the study area had less than 1.30 goats/ha. The areas with utilization rates of rangeland (July) lower than 45% and 20% made up about 95% and 60% of the study area, respectively. Grazing significantly reduced monthly aboveground biomass, but the grazing effects on plant growth rate were complex across the different plant growth stages. Grazing impaired plant growth in general, but the intermediate GI appeared to facilitate plant growth rate at the end of the growing seasons. Grazing had minimal relationship with vegetation community structure characteristics, though Importance Value of forbs increased with increasing GI. Flexibility in the number of goats and conservatively defining utilization rate, according to the inter-annual variation of utilization biomass, would be beneficial to achieve ecologically healthy and economically sustainable GI.

Suggested Citation

  • Hua Cheng & Baocheng Jin & Kai Luo & Jiuying Pei & Xueli Zhang & Yonghong Zhang & Jiaqi Tang & Qin Yang & Guojun Sun, 2021. "Vegetation Response to Goats Grazing Intensity in Semiarid Hilly Grassland of the Loess Plateau, Lanzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3569-:d:522556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3569/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3569/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qingqing Ma & Linrong Chai & Fujiang Hou & Shenghua Chang & Yushou Ma & Atsushi Tsunekawa & Yunxiang Cheng, 2019. "Quantifying Grazing Intensity Using Remote Sensing in Alpine Meadows on Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Liang Yan & Guangsheng Zhou & Feng Zhang, 2013. "Effects of Different Grazing Intensities on Grassland Production in China: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gaohuan Liu & Zhonghe Zhao, 2018. "Analysis of Carbon Storage and Its Contributing Factors—A Case Study in the Loess Plateau (China)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Zhiyuan Song & Ziyi Gao & Xianming Yang & Yuejing Ge, 2022. "Distinguishing the Impacts of Human Activities and Climate Change on the Livelihood Environment of Pastoralists in the Qinghai Lake Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Yang, Fanzheng & Hou, Lingling & Xia, Fang, 2024. "Intergenerational altruism, pessimism bias on tenure insecurity, and sustainable land use: Evidence from household grassland management in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    4. Hu, Yuanning & Huang, Jikun & Hou, Lingling, 2019. "Impacts of the Grassland Ecological Compensation Policy on Household Livestock Production in China: An Empirical Study in Inner Mongolia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 248-256.
    5. Suizi Wang & Jiangwen Fan & Yuzhe Li & Lin Huang, 2019. "Effects of Grazing Exclusion on Biomass Growth and Species Diversity among Various Grassland Types of the Tibetan Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, March.
    6. Byrne, Anne T. & Hadrich, Joleen C. & Robinson, Brian E. & Han, Guodong, 2020. "A factor-income approach to estimating grassland protection subsidy payments to livestock herders in Inner Mongolia, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    7. Qingqing Ma & Linrong Chai & Fujiang Hou & Shenghua Chang & Yushou Ma & Atsushi Tsunekawa & Yunxiang Cheng, 2019. "Quantifying Grazing Intensity Using Remote Sensing in Alpine Meadows on Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, January.
    8. Jérôme Théau & Étienne Lauzier-Hudon & Lydiane Aubé & Nicolas Devillers, 2021. "Estimation of forage biomass and vegetation cover in grasslands using UAV imagery," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Hui Liu & Xiaoyu Song & Lin Qin & Wang Wen & Xiaodi Liu & Zhiqiang Hu & Yu Liu, 2020. "Improvement and Application of Key Pasture Theory for the Evaluation of Forage–Livestock Balance in the Seasonal Grazing Regions of China’s Alpine Desert Grasslands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-12, August.
    10. Yunqing Hao & Zhengwei He, 2019. "Effects of grazing patterns on grassland biomass and soil environments in China: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Xuemin Gong & Yijia Wang & Tianyu Zhan & Chenxu Wang & Changjia Li & Yanxu Liu, 2023. "Advances in Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Grazing on Grassland Ecosystems in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, May.
    12. Leah L. Bremer & Neil Nathan & Clay Trauernicht & Puaʻala Pascua & Nicholas Krueger & Jordan Jokiel & Jayme Barton & Gretchen C. Daily, 2021. "Maintaining the Many Societal Benefits of Rangelands: The Case of Hawaiʻi," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-30, July.
    13. Gang Li & Zhi Zhang & Linlu Shi & Yan Zhou & Meng Yang & Jiaxi Cao & Shuhong Wu & Guangchun Lei, 2018. "Effects of Different Grazing Intensities on Soil C, N, and P in an Alpine Meadow on the Qinghai—Tibetan Plateau, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Li, Dongqing & Hou, Lingling & Zuo, Alec, 2021. "Informal institutions and grassland protection: Empirical evidence from pastoral regions in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3569-:d:522556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.