IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i5p2834-d511437.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Harm Reduction Needle and Syringe Programs for People Who Inject Drugs: A Scoping Review of Their Implementation Qualities

Author

Listed:
  • Danielle Resiak

    (Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia)

  • Elias Mpofu

    (Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia
    Rehabilitation and Health Services, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 26203, USA
    Educational Psychology Department, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2092, South Africa)

  • Rodd Rothwell

    (Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia)

Abstract

While substance use disorders (SUD) continue to be a global concern, harm reduction approaches can provide sustainable harm minimization to people who inject drugs (PWID) without requiring abstinence. Yet, the evidence for the sustainable implementation of harm reduction approaches is newly emerging. This scoping review sought to map the evidence on implementation qualities of sustainable harm reduction needle and syringe programs (NSPs). We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, ProQuest Central, and Directory of Open Access Journals for empirical studies (a) with an explicit focus on harm minimization NSPs, (b) with a clearly identified study population, (c) that described the specific NSP implementation protocol, (d) that provided information on accessibility, affordability, and feasibility, and (e) were published in English between 2000–2020. Following narrative qualitative synthesis, the evidence suggests individual implementer characteristics directly influenced sustainable availability and scope of NSP provision while implementation processes explained the predictability and continuity of service provision across services. External factors including community perceptions of NSPs and policing activity influenced the sustainability of NSP implementation. The emerging evidence suggests that sustainable NSP programs for PWID require provider, consumer, and community engagement, supported by enabling health policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Danielle Resiak & Elias Mpofu & Rodd Rothwell, 2021. "Sustainable Harm Reduction Needle and Syringe Programs for People Who Inject Drugs: A Scoping Review of Their Implementation Qualities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-11, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2834-:d:511437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2834/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2834/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Tung-Manh Ho & Hong-Kong Nguyen & Thu-Trang Vuong, 2018. "Healthcare consumers’ sensitivity to costs: a reflection on behavioural economics from an emerging market," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Bluthenthal, R.N. & Heinzerling, K.G. & Anderson, R. & Flynn, N.M. & Kral, A.H., 2008. "Approval of syringe exchange programs in California: Results from a local approach to HIV prevention," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(2), pages 278-283.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vuong, Quan-Hoang & La, Viet-Phuong, 2019. "The bayesvl R package. User guide v0.8.1," OSF Preprints w5dx6, Center for Open Science.
    2. Viet-Phuong La & Thanh-Hang Pham & Manh-Toan Ho & Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Khanh-Linh P. Nguyen & Thu-Trang Vuong & Hong-Kong T. Nguyen & Trung Tran & Quy Khuc & Manh-Tung Ho & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2020. "Policy Response, Social Media and Science Journalism for the Sustainability of the Public Health System Amid the COVID-19 Outbreak: The Vietnam Lessons," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-27, April.
    3. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2022. "Behavioural Economics Assignment: Business Consumer Decision-Making & Consumer Surplus," OSF Preprints 4jrc8, Center for Open Science.
    4. Le, Tam-Tri & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang, 2022. "Serendipity-based decisions of choosing journals for publication," OSF Preprints 592sa, Center for Open Science.
    5. Vuong, Quan-Hoang & La, Viet-Phuong & Ho, Manh-Toan, 2019. "The bayesvl R package. Hướng dẫn sử dụng v0.8," OSF Preprints yacs5, Center for Open Science.
    6. Agnieszka Bem & Rafał Siedlecki & Paweł Prędkiewicz & Patrizia Gazzola & Bożena Ryszawska & Paulina Ucieklak-Jeż, 2019. "Hospitals’ Financial Health in Rural and Urban Areas in Poland: Does It Ensure Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Marco Remondino, 2018. "Information Technology in Healthcare: HHC-MOTES, a Novel Set of Metrics to Analyse IT Sustainability in Different Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Francesca Iandolo & Pietro Vito & Irene Fulco & Francesca Loia, 2018. "From Health Technology Assessment to Health Technology Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Xingtian Chen & Wei Gong & Xiaoxu Wu & Wenwu Zhao, 2021. "Estimating Economic Losses Caused by COVID-19 under Multiple Control Measure Scenarios with a Coupled Infectious Disease—Economic Model: A Case Study in Wuhan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Séverin Aimé Blanchard Ouadika, 2020. "Health shocks and vulnerability to poverty in Congo," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
    11. Gabriele Palozzi & Sandro Brunelli & Camilla Falivena, 2018. "Higher Sustainability and Lower Opportunistic Behaviour in Healthcare: A New Framework for Performing Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Mele, Cristina & Russo Spena, Tiziana & Kaartemo, Valtteri & Marzullo, Maria Luisa, 2021. "Smart nudging: How cognitive technologies enable choice architectures for value co-creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 949-960.
    13. Aiolfi, Simone, 2023. "Green Digital Nudging and channel relationships," OSF Preprints 8wuzy, Center for Open Science.
    14. Yang Chi & Congcong Yu & Xiaohui Qi & Hao Xu, 2018. "Knowledge Management in Healthcare Sustainability: A Smart Healthy Diet Assistant in Traditional Chinese Medicine Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    15. Caroline Ärleskog & Nicoline Vackerberg & Ann-Christine Andersson, 2021. "Balancing power in co-production: introducing a reflection model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-7, December.
    16. Manh-Toan Ho & Viet-Phuong La & Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Thu-Trang Vuong & Kien-Cuong P. Nghiem & Trung Tran & Hong-Kong T. Nguyen & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2019. "Health Care, Medical Insurance, and Economic Destitution: A Dataset of 1042 Stories," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, April.
    17. Laeheem, K., 2020. "Causal relationships between religion factors influencing ethical behavior among youth in the three southern border provinces of Thailand," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    18. Sanqin Mao & Jie Chen, 2021. "Neighborhood-Based Social Capital and Depressive Symptoms among Adults: Evidence from Guangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-14, October.
    19. Hangzhou Yang & Huiying Gao, 2018. "Toward Sustainable Virtualized Healthcare: Extracting Medical Entities from Chinese Online Health Consultations Using Deep Neural Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    20. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Anh-Duc Hoang & Thu-Trang Vuong & Viet-Phuong La & Hong Kong T. Nguyen & Manh-Tung Ho, 2018. "Factors Associated with the Regularity of Physical Exercises as a Means of Improving the Public Health System in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2834-:d:511437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.