IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i5p2743-d509911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Variables Leading to Apparent Incongruity between Antimethanogenic Potential of Tannins and Their Observed Effects in Ruminants—A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Supriya Verma

    (Grass and Forage Science/Organic Agriculture, Institute of Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Hermann-Rodewald Str. 9, DE-24118 Kiel, Germany)

  • Friedhelm Taube

    (Grass and Forage Science/Organic Agriculture, Institute of Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Hermann-Rodewald Str. 9, DE-24118 Kiel, Germany
    Grass Based Dairy Systems, Animal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University (WUR), 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Carsten S. Malisch

    (Grass and Forage Science/Organic Agriculture, Institute of Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Hermann-Rodewald Str. 9, DE-24118 Kiel, Germany)

Abstract

In recent years, several secondary plant metabolites have been identified that possess antimethanogenic properties. Tannin-rich forages have the potential to reduce methane emissions in ruminants while also increasing their nutrient use efficiency and promoting overall animal health. However, results have been highly inconclusive to date, with their antimethanogenic potential and effects on both animal performance and nutrition being highly variable even within a plant species. This variability is attributed to the structural characteristics of the tannins, many of which have been linked to an increased antimethanogenic potential. However, these characteristics are seldom considered in ruminant nutrition studies—often because the analytical techniques are inadequate to identify tannin structure and the focus is mostly on total tannin concentrations. Hence, in this article, we (i) review previous research that illustrate the variability of the antimethanogenic potential of forages; (ii) identify the source of inconsistencies behind these results; and (iii) discuss how these could be optimized to generate comparable and repeatable results. By adhering to this roadmap, we propose that there are clear links between plant metabolome and physiology and their antimethanogenic potential that can be established with the ultimate goal of improving the sustainable intensification of livestock.

Suggested Citation

  • Supriya Verma & Friedhelm Taube & Carsten S. Malisch, 2021. "Examining the Variables Leading to Apparent Incongruity between Antimethanogenic Potential of Tannins and Their Observed Effects in Ruminants—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2743-:d:509911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2743/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2743/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer W. MacAdam & Juan J. Villalba, 2015. "Beneficial Effects of Temperate Forage Legumes that Contain Condensed Tannins," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-17, July.
    2. An Ha Truong & Minh Thuy Kim & Thi Thu Nguyen & Ngoc Tung Nguyen & Quang Trung Nguyen, 2018. "Methane, Nitrous Oxide and Ammonia Emissions from Livestock Farming in the Red River Delta, Vietnam: An Inventory and Projection for 2000–2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-12, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Petrič & Michaela Komáromyová & Dominika Batťányi & Martyna Kozłowska & Weronika Filipiak & Anna Łukomska & Sylwester Ślusarczyk & Malgorzata Szumacher-Strabel & Adam Cieślak & Marián Várady & , 2022. "Effect of Sainfoin ( Onobrychis viciifolia ) Pellets on Rumen Microbiome and Histopathology in Lambs Exposed to Gastrointestinal Nematodes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Rajeev Bhat & Jorgelina Di Pasquale & Ferenc Istvan Bánkuti & Tiago Teixeira da Silva Siqueira & Philip Shine & Michael D. Murphy, 2022. "Global Dairy Sector: Trends, Prospects, and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-7, April.
    3. José Felipe Orzuna-Orzuna & Griselda Dorantes-Iturbide & Alejandro Lara-Bueno & Germán David Mendoza-Martínez & Luis Alberto Miranda-Romero & Pedro Abel Hernández-García, 2021. "Effects of Dietary Tannins’ Supplementation on Growth Performance, Rumen Fermentation, and Enteric Methane Emissions in Beef Cattle: A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-27, July.
    4. Udaya Subedi & Kazi Kader & Kethmi N. Jayawardhane & Hari Poudel & Guanqun Chen & Surya Acharya & Luiz S. A. Camargo & Daniela Matias de C. Bittencourt & Stacy D. Singer, 2022. "The Potential of Novel Gene Editing-Based Approaches in Forages and Rumen Archaea for Reducing Livestock Methane Emissions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Petrič & Michaela Komáromyová & Dominika Batťányi & Martyna Kozłowska & Weronika Filipiak & Anna Łukomska & Sylwester Ślusarczyk & Malgorzata Szumacher-Strabel & Adam Cieślak & Marián Várady & , 2022. "Effect of Sainfoin ( Onobrychis viciifolia ) Pellets on Rumen Microbiome and Histopathology in Lambs Exposed to Gastrointestinal Nematodes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Yixuan Guo & Yidong Wang & Shufeng Chen & Shunan Zheng & Changcheng Guo & Dongmei Xue & Yakov Kuzyakov & Zhong-Liang Wang, 2019. "Inventory of Spatio-Temporal Methane Emissions from Livestock and Poultry Farming in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-11, July.
    3. Barbara Wróbel & Waldemar Zielewicz & Mariola Staniak, 2023. "Challenges of Pasture Feeding Systems—Opportunities and Constraints," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-31, April.
    4. Piotr Goliński & Patrycja Sobolewska & Barbara Stefańska & Barbara Golińska, 2022. "Virtual Fencing Technology for Cattle Management in the Pasture Feeding System—A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Cory Matthew & Lilian Elgalise Techio Pereira, 2017. "Forage Plant Ecophysiology: A Discipline Come of Age," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-9, July.
    6. Hajer Ammar & Sourour Abidi & Mediha Ayed & Nizar Moujahed & Mario E. deHaro Martí & Mireille Chahine & Rachid Bouraoui & Secundino López & Hatem Cheikh M’hamed & Haikel Hechlef, 2020. "Estimation of Tunisian Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Different Livestock Species," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2743-:d:509911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.