IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i5p2716-d509482.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil Respiration May Overestimate or Underestimate in Forest Ecosystems

Author

Listed:
  • Yuanbo Cao

    (National Hulunber Grassland Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Huijie Xiao

    (College of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Baitian Wang

    (College of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yunlong Zhang

    (College of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Honghui Wu

    (National Hulunber Grassland Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Xijing Wang

    (Beijing Vocational College of Agriculture, Beijing 102442, China)

  • Yadong Yang

    (National Hulunber Grassland Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Tingting Wei

    (China National Gold Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100011, China)

Abstract

The inappropriate selection of measurement points and measurement times in an ecosystem may easily lead to the underestimation or overestimation of soil respiration due to spatial and temporal heterogeneity. To assess the law of spatial and temporal heterogeneity and more accurately determine the soil respiration rate, we measured the soil respiration rate of a forest in the plant growing season from 2011 to 2013 on Changbai Mountain in 8 directions and 7 distances from each tree trunk. Neglecting the direction of the measuring point may overestimate or underestimate the soil respiration rate by 29.81% and 26.09%, respectively; neglecting the distance may overestimate or underestimate the soil respiration rate by 41.36% and 20.28%, respectively; and ignoring the measurement time may overestimate and underestimate the soil respiration rate by 41.71% and 57.64%, respectively. In addition, choosing a measurement point in the eastern direction at a 1.8 m distance and conducting the measurement in September may relatively accurately reflect the soil respiration rate of the ecosystem. These findings can deepen our understanding of soil respiration rate heterogeneity and may provide new ideas for improving the measurement method of soil respiration.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuanbo Cao & Huijie Xiao & Baitian Wang & Yunlong Zhang & Honghui Wu & Xijing Wang & Yadong Yang & Tingting Wei, 2021. "Soil Respiration May Overestimate or Underestimate in Forest Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2716-:d:509482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2716/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2716/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Heimann & Markus Reichstein, 2008. "Terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics and climate feedbacks," Nature, Nature, vol. 451(7176), pages 289-292, January.
    2. Mark G. Lawrence & Stefan Schäfer & Helene Muri & Vivian Scott & Andreas Oschlies & Naomi E. Vaughan & Olivier Boucher & Hauke Schmidt & Jim Haywood & Jürgen Scheffran, 2018. "Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Eric A. Davidson & Ivan A. Janssens, 2006. "Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change," Nature, Nature, vol. 440(7081), pages 165-173, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuxuan Gou & Dong Liu & Xiangjun Liu & Zhiqing Zhuo & Chongyang Shen & Yunjia Liu & Meng Cao & Yuangfang Huang, 2022. "Scale-Location Dependence Relationship between Soil Organic Matter and Environmental Factors by Anisotropy Analysis and Multiple Wavelet Coherence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Litong Chen & Dan F B Flynn & Xin Jing & Peter Kühn & Thomas Scholten & Jin-Sheng He, 2015. "A Comparison of Two Methods for Quantifying Soil Organic Carbon of Alpine Grasslands on the Tibetan Plateau," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    3. MB Dastagiri & Anjani Sneha Vajrala, 2018. "Financing Climate Change on Global Agriculture-An Overview," International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 12(5), pages 148-153, July.
    4. Wenhao Zhang & Guofeng Zhu & Qiaozhuo Wan & Siyu Lu & Ling Zhao & Dongdong Qiu & Xinrui Lin, 2023. "Influence of Irrigation on Vertical Migration of Soil Organic Carbon in Arid Area of Inland River," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Braakhekke, Maarten C. & Beer, Christian & Hoosbeek, Marcel R. & Reichstein, Markus & Kruijt, Bart & Schrumpf, Marion & Kabat, Pavel, 2011. "SOMPROF: A vertically explicit soil organic matter model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(10), pages 1712-1730.
    6. Md. Zonayet & Alok Kumar Paul & Md. Faisal-E-Alam & Khalid Syfullah & Rui Alexandre Castanho & Daniel Meyer, 2023. "Impact of Biochar as a Soil Conditioner to Improve the Soil Properties of Saline Soil and Productivity of Tomato," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    7. S . K. Oni & F. Mieres & M. N. Futter & H. Laudon, 2017. "Soil temperature responses to climate change along a gradient of upland–riparian transect in boreal forest," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 27-41, July.
    8. Elena A. Mikhailova & Garth R. Groshans & Christopher J. Post & Mark A. Schlautman & Gregory C. Post, 2019. "Valuation of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks in the Contiguous United States Based on the Avoided Social Cost of Carbon Emissions," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, August.
    9. Sabastine Ugbemuna Ugbaje & Thomas F.A. Bishop, 2020. "Hydrological Control of Vegetation Greenness Dynamics in Africa: A Multivariate Analysis Using Satellite Observed Soil Moisture, Terrestrial Water Storage and Precipitation," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Li Gao & Mingjing Huang & Wuping Zhang & Lei Qiao & Guofang Wang & Xumeng Zhang, 2021. "Comparative Study on Spatial Digital Mapping Methods of Soil Nutrients Based on Different Geospatial Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Raitis Normunds Meļņiks & Arta Bārdule & Aldis Butlers & Jordane Champion & Santa Kalēja & Ilona Skranda & Guna Petaja & Andis Lazdiņš, 2023. "Carbon Losses from Topsoil in Abandoned Peat Extraction Sites Due to Ground Subsidence and Erosion," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Xiangwen Wu & Shuying Zang & Dalong Ma & Jianhua Ren & Qiang Chen & Xingfeng Dong, 2019. "Emissions of CO 2 , CH 4 , and N 2 O Fluxes from Forest Soil in Permafrost Region of Daxing’an Mountains, Northeast China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-14, August.
    13. Husnain Husnain & I. Wigena & Ai Dariah & Setiari Marwanto & Prihasto Setyanto & Fahmuddin Agus, 2014. "CO 2 emissions from tropical drained peat in Sumatra, Indonesia," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 845-862, August.
    14. Nikolay Gorbach & Viktor Startsev & Anton Mazur & Evgeniy Milanovskiy & Anatoly Prokushkin & Alexey Dymov, 2022. "Simulation of Smoldering Combustion of Organic Horizons at Pine and Spruce Boreal Forests with Lab-Heating Experiments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Asik Dutta & Ranjan Bhattacharyya & Raimundo Jiménez-Ballesta & Abir Dey & Namita Das Saha & Sarvendra Kumar & Chaitanya Prasad Nath & Ved Prakash & Surendra Singh Jatav & Abhik Patra, 2023. "Conventional and Zero Tillage with Residue Management in Rice–Wheat System in the Indo-Gangetic Plains: Impact on Thermal Sensitivity of Soil Organic Carbon Respiration and Enzyme Activity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Songbai Hong & Jinzhi Ding & Fei Kan & Hao Xu & Shaoyuan Chen & Yitong Yao & Shilong Piao, 2023. "Asymmetry of carbon sequestrations by plant and soil after forestation regulated by soil nitrogen," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    17. Yongxia Ding & Siqi Liang & Shouzhang Peng, 2019. "Climate Change Affects Forest Productivity in a Typical Climate Transition Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, May.
    18. Franco-Luesma, Samuel & Álvaro-Fuentes, Jorge & Plaza-Bonilla, Daniel & Arrúe, José Luis & Cantero-Martínez, Carlos & Cavero, José, 2019. "Influence of irrigation time and frequency on greenhouse gas emissions in a solid-set sprinkler-irrigated maize under Mediterranean conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 303-311.
    19. Coletti, Janaine Z. & Hinz, Christoph & Vogwill, Ryan & Hipsey, Matthew R., 2013. "Hydrological controls on carbon metabolism in wetlands," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 3-18.
    20. Ángel Galán-Martín & Daniel Vázquez & Selene Cobo & Niall Dowell & José Antonio Caballero & Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez, 2021. "Delaying carbon dioxide removal in the European Union puts climate targets at risk," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2716-:d:509482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.