IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13210-d690528.html

Spatiotemporal Contribution of Participants in Patrolling Efforts from a Forest Station, Pu Hu Nature Reserve, Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen Dinh Hai

    (Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai 90100, Thailand
    Thanh Hoa Agricultural Institution, Thanh Hoa 440000, Vietnam)

  • Le Khac Dong

    (Department of Agricultural and Rural Development, Thanh Hoa 440000, Vietnam)

  • Duong Thi Men

    (Hai Duong Forest Protection Department, Hai Duong 17000, Vietnam)

  • Thi Huynh Nguyen Nha

    (Faculty of Finance-Banking and Business Administration, Quy Nhon University, Quy Nhon 55113, Vietnam)

  • Thi Thu Ha Hue

    (Central Institute for Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, Vietnam National University, Ha Noi 10000, Vietnam)

  • Siriporn Pradit

    (Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai 90100, Thailand
    Coastal Oceanography and Climate Change Research Center, Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai 90100, Thailand)

Abstract

Understanding the contributions of participants from management practices and those from the local community to protected areas (PAs) as nature reserves, is crucial for forest protection and resource conservation. Thus, empirical studies have usually investigated whether patrolling has significantly improved forest protection action. Many previous studies have exhaustively examined the contributions to forest protection by rangers or local persons, but there has been little research on the contribution of both sides to patrol efforts with separate consideration given to each. This paper explores insights into the patrol efforts in the Nam Tien forest station. The total number of patrollers, walking distances, and working days across years were significantly different between the ranger and local person patrol groups. There was a considerable variation in the number of patrollers (Z = 2.02; p < 0.01), distance (Z = 2.45; p < 0.01) and working days (Z = 2.37; p < 0.01) between rangers and local persons related to monthly patrolling. For the traditional patrols in the various PAs, it is shown that, for long-term forest protection, local persons patrolling should be considered more, in order to achieve the sustainable conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen Dinh Hai & Le Khac Dong & Duong Thi Men & Thi Huynh Nguyen Nha & Thi Thu Ha Hue & Siriporn Pradit, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Contribution of Participants in Patrolling Efforts from a Forest Station, Pu Hu Nature Reserve, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-11, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13210-:d:690528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13210/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13210/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James E. M. Watson & Nigel Dudley & Daniel B. Segan & Marc Hockings, 2014. "The performance and potential of protected areas," Nature, Nature, vol. 515(7525), pages 67-73, November.
    2. Belachew Gizachew & Rasmus Astrup & Pål Vedeld & Eliakimu M. Zahabu & Lalisa A. Duguma, 2017. "REDD+ in Africa: contexts and challenges," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(2), pages 92-104, May.
    3. William F. Laurance & D. Carolina Useche & Julio Rendeiro & Margareta Kalka & Corey J. A. Bradshaw & Sean P. Sloan & Susan G. Laurance & Mason Campbell & Kate Abernethy & Patricia Alvarez & Victor Arr, 2012. "Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas," Nature, Nature, vol. 489(7415), pages 290-294, September.
    4. Dong Le Khac & Ao Xuan Hoa & Luyen Nguyen Tai & Nha Thi Huynh Nguyen & Kuaanan Techato, 2021. "Monitoring of Field Patrolling Efforts, Vietnam: Insights from a Forest Station in Pu Hu Nature Reserve," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-13, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Santangeli & Benjamin Weigel & Laura H. Antão & Elina Kaarlejärvi & Maria Hällfors & Aleksi Lehikoinen & Andreas Lindén & Maija Salemaa & Tiina Tonteri & Päivi Merilä & Kristiina Vuorio & Otso , 2023. "Mixed effects of a national protected area network on terrestrial and freshwater biodiversity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Heidi J. Albers, 2022. "Protected Area Network Expansion and Management: Economics to improve conservation outcomes," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(4), pages 955-972, December.
    3. Ziqi Meng & Jinwei Dong & Erle C. Ellis & Graciela Metternicht & Yuanwei Qin & Xiao-Peng Song & Sara Löfqvist & Rachael D. Garrett & Xiaopeng Jia & Xiangming Xiao, 2023. "Post-2020 biodiversity framework challenged by cropland expansion in protected areas," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(7), pages 758-768, July.
    4. repec:osf:socarx:qy76a_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Liang, Yuanning & Rudik, Ivan & Zou, Eric Yongchen, 2025. "Economic activity and biodiversity in the United States," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    6. Liang, Yuanning & Rudik, Ivan & Zou, Eric Yongchen, 2021. "Economic Production and Biodiversity in the United States," SocArXiv qy76a, Center for Open Science.
    7. Yajuan Wang & Yongheng Rao & Hongbo Zhu, 2022. "Revealing the Impact of Protected Areas on Land Cover Volatility in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Chunrong Mi & Liang Ma & Mengyuan Yang & Xinhai Li & Shai Meiri & Uri Roll & Oleksandra Oskyrko & Daniel Pincheira-Donoso & Lilly P. Harvey & Daniel Jablonski & Barbod Safaei-Mahroo & Hanyeh Ghaffari , 2023. "Global Protected Areas as refuges for amphibians and reptiles under climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Lin Yuan & Siqi Wang & Jingxuan Hou, 2025. "Coexistence of Built Areas and Natural Protected Areas Within Metropolitan Regions in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, February.
    10. Ming-Kuang Chung & Dau-Jye Lu & Bor-Wen Tsai & Kuei-Tien Chou, 2019. "Assessing Effectiveness of PPGIS on Protected Areas by Governance Quality: A Case Study of Community-Based Monitoring in Wu-Wei-Kang Wildlife Refuge, Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Tingting Zhang & Dan He & Tian Kuang & Ke Chen, 2022. "Effect of Rural Human Settlement Environment around Nature Reserves on Farmers’ Well-Being: A Field Survey Based on 1002 Farmer Households around Six Nature Reserves in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Thomas Campagnaro & Giovanni Trentanovi & Tommaso Sitzia, 2018. "Identifying Habitat Type Conservation Priorities under the Habitats Directive: Application to Two Italian Biogeographical Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Sébastien Desbureaux & Ibrahim Kabore & Giulia Vaglietti & Mujon Baghai & Peter Lindsey & Ashley Robson & Philippe Delacote & Antoine Leblois, 2024. "Collaborative management partnerships strongly decreased deforestation in the most at-risk protected areas in Africa since 2000," Post-Print hal-04869523, HAL.
    14. Adam Pawlewicz & Wojciech Gotkiewicz & Katarzyna Brodzińska & Katarzyna Pawlewicz & Bartosz Mickiewicz & Paweł Kluczek, 2022. "Organic Farming as an Alternative Maintenance Strategy in the Opinion of Farmers from Natura 2000 Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-22, March.
    15. Quintas-Soriano, Cristina & Castro, Antonio J. & Castro, Hermelindo & García-Llorente, Marina, 2016. "Impacts of land use change on ecosystem services and implications for human well-being in Spanish drylands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 534-548.
    16. Qiaoqiao Zhan & Katsunori Furuya & Xiaolan Tang & Zhehui Li, 2024. "Policy Development in China’s Protected Scenic and Historic Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, February.
    17. Jacqueline Loos & Henrik Von Wehrden, 2018. "Beyond Biodiversity Conservation: Land Sharing Constitutes Sustainable Agriculture in European Cultural Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-11, May.
    18. Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Thomas E. Jones, 2022. "Building eco-surplus culture among urban residents as a novel strategy to improve finance for conservation in protected areas," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Alexandra Jiricka-Pürrer & Valeria Tadini & Boris Salak & Karolina Taczanowska & Andrzej Tucki & Giulio Senes, 2019. "Do Protected Areas Contribute to Health and Well-Being? A Cross-Cultural Comparison," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, April.
    20. Changjun Gu & Pei Zhao & Qiong Chen & Shicheng Li & Lanhui Li & Linshan Liu & Yili Zhang, 2020. "Forest Cover Change and the Effectiveness of Protected Areas in the Himalaya since 1998," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, July.
    21. F. Ollier D. Andrianambinina & Jörg Ulrich Ganzhorn & Patrick O. Waeber & Lucienne Wilmé, 2025. "Complex Deforestation Patterns in and Around the Protected Areas of Madagascar from 2015 to 2023," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13210-:d:690528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.