IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13043-d687481.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Techno-Economic Analysis of Sustainable Material Recovery Facilities: The Case of Al-Karak Solid Waste Sorting Plant, Jordan

Author

Listed:
  • Esra’a Amin Al-Athamin

    (Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Mutah University, Al-Karak 61710, Jordan)

  • Safwat Hemidat

    (Department of Waste and Resource Management, University of Rostock, 18051 Rostock, Germany)

  • Husam Al-Hamaiedeh

    (Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Mutah University, Al-Karak 61710, Jordan)

  • Salah H. Aljbour

    (Chemical Engineering Department, Mutah University, Al-Karak 61710, Jordan)

  • Tayel El-Hasan

    (Chemistry Department, Mutah University, Al-Karak 61710, Jordan)

  • Abdallah Nassour

    (Department of Waste and Resource Management, University of Rostock, 18051 Rostock, Germany)

Abstract

Solid waste sorting facilities are constructed and operated to properly manage solid waste for both material and energy recovery. This paper investigates the possible technical and economic performance of the Al-Karak solid waste sorting plant in order to achieve financial sustainability and increase the profits that return on the plant to cover its operating costs. A standard procedure was followed to quantify and characterize the input materials of commercial solid waste by determining the recyclable materials in the sorting products. Thus, possible different equipment and material flows through the plant were proposed. An economic model was used in order to know the feasibility of the proposed options of the plant according to three economic factors, which are net present worth (NPW), return on investment (ROI), and payback period values. The results inferred that the characterization of the input materials contains a high portion of recyclable materials of paper, cardboard, plastic, and metals, which accounted for 63%. In this case, the mass of rejected waste to be landfilled was 9%. Results for the proposed options showed that the economic analysis is feasible when working loads on three and two shifts with ROI values of 4.4 and 3.5 with a payback period of the initial cost in 2 and 3 years, respectively. Working load on one shift was not feasible, which resulted in an ROI value of less than 2 and a payback period larger than 5 years. This paper recommended operating the sorting plant at a higher input feed with a working load on three shifts daily to ensure a maximum profit and to reduce the amount of commercial solid waste prior to landfilling through the concept of sorting and recycling.

Suggested Citation

  • Esra’a Amin Al-Athamin & Safwat Hemidat & Husam Al-Hamaiedeh & Salah H. Aljbour & Tayel El-Hasan & Abdallah Nassour, 2021. "A Techno-Economic Analysis of Sustainable Material Recovery Facilities: The Case of Al-Karak Solid Waste Sorting Plant, Jordan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13043-:d:687481
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13043/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13043/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammad Aljaradin, 2014. "Solid Waste Management in Jordan," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 4(11), pages 138-150, November.
    2. Raul Oliveira Neto & Pascal Gastineau & Bogdan Cazacliu & Laurédan Le Guen & Régis Sebben Paranhos & Carlos Otavio Petter, 2017. "An economic analysis of the processing technologies in CDW recycling platforms," Post-Print hal-01511597, HAL.
    3. Rebekka Volk & Christoph Stallkamp & Justus J. Steins & Savina Padumane Yogish & Richard C. Müller & Dieter Stapf & Frank Schultmann, 2021. "Techno‐economic assessment and comparison of different plastic recycling pathways: A German case study," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(5), pages 1318-1337, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hani A. Abu-Qdais & Anna I. Kurbatova, 2022. "Editorial: Sustainable Municipal Solid Waste Management: A Local Issue with Global Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-3, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tan, Kai Qi & Ahmad, Mohd Azmier & Oh, Wen Da & Low, Siew Chun, 2023. "Valorization of hazardous plastic wastes into value-added resources by catalytic pyrolysis-gasification: A review of techno-economic analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    2. Zhang, Ning & Zhang, Duo & Zuo, Jian & Miller, Travis R. & Duan, Huabo & Schiller, Georg, 2022. "Potential for CO2 mitigation and economic benefits from accelerated carbonation of construction and demolition waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Sarah Schmidt & David Laner, 2023. "The environmental performance of plastic packaging waste management in Germany: Current and future key factors," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(6), pages 1447-1460, December.
    4. Christoph Stallkamp & Malte Hennig & Rebekka Volk & Frank Richter & Britta Bergfeldt & Salar Tavakkol & Frank Schultmann & Dieter Stapf, 2023. "Economic and environmental assessment of automotive plastic waste end‐of‐life options: Energy recovery versus chemical recycling," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(5), pages 1319-1334, October.
    5. Hoang Giang Nguyen & Dung Tien Nguyen & Ha Tan Nghiem & Viet Cuong Tran & Akira Kato & Akihiro Matsuno & Yugo Isobe & Mikio Kawasaki & Ken Kawamoto, 2021. "Current Management Condition and Waste Composition Characteristics of Construction and Demolition Waste Landfills in Hanoi of Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-29, September.
    6. Ana Antunes & Ricardo Martins & José Dinis Silvestre & Ricardo do Carmo & Hugo Costa & Eduardo Júlio & Pedro Pedroso, 2021. "Environmental Impacts and Benefits of the End-of-Life of Building Materials: Database to Support Decision Making and Contribute to Circularity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-25, November.
    7. Rajesh Mehta & Milad Golkaram & Jack T. W. E. Vogels & Tom Ligthart & Eugene Someren & Spela Ferjan & Jelmer Lennartz, 2023. "BEVSIM: Battery electric vehicle sustainability impact assessment model," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(5), pages 1266-1276, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13043-:d:687481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.