IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p11778-d664148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation Model for Sustainable Development of Settlement System

Author

Listed:
  • Alena Harbiankova

    (Highways Department, Belarusian-Russian University, 212000 Mogilev, Belarus)

  • Elena Scherbina

    (Urban Planning Department, National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, 129337 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

Sustainability of settlement systems is of greatest relevance in political and socio-economic stability all over the world. The development effectiveness of a rural settlement system involves the solution of a number of matters in sustainable development, namely social welfare and environmental balance, economy and industry development, improving the pipeline and utility infrastructure, and improving the efficiency of the decision-making process. Currently, the sustainability of a rural settlement system is one of the key objectives in regional planning in post-Soviet countries. The introduction of new tools for assessing and managing the settlement system development is particularly true for Belarus, as a country with a strong focus on agricultural industry. The research aim was to develop and approve a model for evaluating the settlement system development. The research methods were based on the complex and interdisciplinary approaches, namely the system-element approach, the comparative analysis, spatial and mathematical modelling, factor analysis, and the cartographic analysis. The model was approved by practical consideration for evaluating the development of the analogue object at the local planning level. The practical relevance of the research is associated with the potential for using the model as a significant tool in land use planning. The model employs both quantitative and qualitative evaluation to obtain alternative solutions towards sustainable development of rural areas. Another advantage of the model is its multifunctionality, which enables: (1) sustainability evaluation of a settlement system, (2) establishment of regional planning priority areas, and (3) development of specific measures for ensuring the sustainability of a regional settlement system and its elements.

Suggested Citation

  • Alena Harbiankova & Elena Scherbina, 2021. "Evaluation Model for Sustainable Development of Settlement System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11778-:d:664148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11778/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11778/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aliye Ahu Gulumser & Tuzin Baycan-Levent & Peter Nijkamp, 2011. "Creative capacity for sustainable development: A comparative analysis of European and Turkish rural regions," ERSA conference papers ersa10p451, European Regional Science Association.
    2. Elena Gorbenkova & Elena Shcherbina, 2020. "Historical-Genetic Features in Rural Settlement System: A Case Study from Mogilev District (Mogilev Oblast, Belarus)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Gianluca Egidi & Rares Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir & Sirio Cividino & Giovanni Quaranta & Luca Salvati & Andrea Colantoni, 2020. "Rural in Town: Traditional Agriculture, Population Trends, and Long-Term Urban Expansion in Metropolitan Rome," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Akgun, A.A. & Baycan, T. & Nijkamp, P., 2011. "Repositioning rural areas as promising future hot spots," Serie Research Memoranda 0013, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    5. Anna Korobeynikova & Nina Danilina & Nikolay Makisha, 2021. "Sustainable Development of the Slope Lands of the Russian Arctic: Investigation of the Relationship between Slope Aspects, Wind Regime and Residential Wind Comfort," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Andrzej Rosner & Monika Wesołowska, 2020. "Deagrarianisation of the Economic Structure and the Evolution of Rural Settlement Patterns in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Grzegorz Ślusarz & Barbara Gołębiewska & Marek Cierpiał-Wolan & Dariusz Twaróg & Jarosław Gołębiewski & Sebastian Wójcik, 2021. "The Role of Agriculture and Rural Areas in the Development of Autonomous Energy Regions in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, July.
    8. Mauro Agnoletti & Francesca Emanueli & Federica Corrieri & Martina Venturi & Antonio Santoro, 2019. "Monitoring Traditional Rural Landscapes. The Case of Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Piotr Prus & Marek Sikora, 2021. "The Impact of Transport Infrastructure on the Sustainable Development of the Region—Case Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Premysl Stych & Jan Kabrda & Ivan Bicik & Josef Lastovicka, 2019. "Regional Differentiation of Long-Term Land Use Changes: A Case Study of Czechia," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Gema Cárdenas Alonso & Ana Nieto Masot, 2017. "Towards Rural Sustainable Development? Contributions of the EAFRD 2007–2013 in Low Demographic Density Territories: The Case of Extremadura (SW Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    12. Nils-Magnus Wasser & Philipp Ruhstorfer & Björn-Martin Kurzrock, 2020. "Advancing Revolving Funds for the Sustainable Development of Rural Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-20, October.
    13. Monika Stanny & Łukasz Komorowski & Andrzej Rosner, 2021. "The Socio-Economic Heterogeneity of Rural Areas: Towards a Rural Typology of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    14. María F. Schmitz & Cecilia Arnaiz-Schmitz & Patricio Sarmiento-Mateos, 2021. "High Nature Value Farming Systems and Protected Areas: Conservation Opportunities or Land Abandonment? A Study Case in the Madrid Region (Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    15. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2:p:438-463 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Magdalena Wilkosz-Mamcarczyk & Barbara Olczak & Barbara Prus, 2020. "Urban Features in Rural Landscape: A Case Study of the Municipality of Skawina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-24, June.
    17. Akgun, A.A. & Leeuwen, E.S. van & Nijkamp, P., 2011. "A systemic perspective on multi-stakeholder sustainable development strategies," Serie Research Memoranda 0009, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    18. Rosanna Salvia & Rares Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir & Sirio Cividino & Luca Salvati & Giovanni Quaranta, 2020. "From Rural Spaces to Peri-Urban Districts: Metropolitan Growth, Sparse Settlements and Demographic Dynamics in a Mediterranean Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Fan Yang & Guangqing Chi & Ge Wang & Shirui Tang & Yunting Li & Cong Ju, 2020. "Untangle the Complex Stakeholder Relationships in Rural Settlement Consolidation in China: A Social Network Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-19, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alena Harbiankova & Lora Gertsberg, 2022. "Information Model for Sustainable Rural Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Alena Harbiankova & Sławomir Kalinowski, 2023. "MSW Management to Zero Waste: Challenges and Perspectives in Belarus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Anna A. Mikhaylova & Jan A. Wendt & Dmitry V. Hvaley & Agnieszka Bógdał-Brzezińska & Andrey S. Mikhaylov, 2022. "Impact of Cross-Border Tourism on the Sustainable Development of Rural Areas in the Russian–Polish and Russian–Kazakh Borderlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-29, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alena Harbiankova & Lora Gertsberg, 2022. "Information Model for Sustainable Rural Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Elena Gorbenkova & Elena Shcherbina, 2020. "Historical-Genetic Features in Rural Settlement System: A Case Study from Mogilev District (Mogilev Oblast, Belarus)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Fabrizio Battisti & Orazio Campo & Benedetto Manganelli, 2022. "Land Management in Territorial Planning: Analysis, Appraisal, Strategies for Sustainability—A Review of Studies and Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-5, July.
    4. Lingyu Kong & Xiaodong Xu & Wei Wang & Jinxiu Wu & Meiying Zhang, 2021. "Comprehensive Evaluation and Quantitative Research on the Living Protection of Traditional Villages from the Perspective of “Production–Living–Ecology”," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-25, May.
    5. Szabolcs Bérczi & Zita Szabó & Ágnes Sallay, 2022. "Strategic Directions: Evaluation of Village Development Strategies in the Case of Applicants for the Hungarian Village Renewal Award," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Maria Zuba-Ciszewska & Aleksandra Kowalska & Aneta Brodziak & Louise Manning, 2023. "Organic Milk Production Sector in Poland: Driving the Potential to Meet Future Market, Societal and Environmental Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Karol Król, 2020. "The Scarecrow as Part of Polish Rural Cultural Landscapes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Jichang Cui & Yanbo Qu & Yan Li & Lingyun Zhan & Guancheng Guo & Xiaozhen Dong, 2022. "Reconstruction of Rural Settlement Patterns in China: The Role of Land Consolidation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Michael Howes & Liana Wortley & Ruth Potts & Aysin Dedekorkut-Howes & Silvia Serrao-Neumann & Julie Davidson & Timothy Smith & Patrick Nunn, 2017. "Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Rocío Silva-Pérez & Gema González-Romero, 2022. "GIAHS as an Instrument to Articulate the Landscape and Territorialized Agrifood Systems—The Example of La Axarquía (Malaga Province, Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Coronese, Matteo & Occelli, Martina & Lamperti, Francesco & Roventini, Andrea, 2023. "AgriLOVE: Agriculture, land-use and technical change in an evolutionary, agent-based model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    12. Jesús Barrena-González & Jesús Rodrigo-Comino & Yeboah Gyasi-Agyei & Manuel Pulido Fernández & Artemi Cerdà, 2020. "Applying the RUSLE and ISUM in the Tierra de Barros Vineyards (Extremadura, Spain) to Estimate Soil Mobilisation Rates," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, March.
    13. Qu, Yanbo & Li, Yan & Zhao, Weiying & Zhan, Lingyun, 2023. "Does the rural housing land system reform model meeting the needs of farmers improve the welfare of farmers?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    14. Monika Stanny & Łukasz Komorowski & Andrzej Rosner, 2021. "The Socio-Economic Heterogeneity of Rural Areas: Towards a Rural Typology of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    15. Aliye Ahu Akgün & Eveline van Leeuwen & Peter Nijkamp, 2011. "The Usefulness Of Analytical Tools For Sustainable Futures," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1575, European Regional Science Association.
    16. Mohammed J. Alshayeb, 2025. "Evaluating Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs and Recovery Dynamics in Response to Urban Expansion: Implications for Sustainable Management Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-30, March.
    17. Corina Cristiana NASTACÄ‚, 2024. "Rail Transport Services In Romania: Perceptions, Problems And Perspectives," APPLIED RESEARCH IN ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 5(3), pages 16-26, December.
    18. Kourtit Karima & Nijkamp Peter & Suzuki Soushi, 2016. "New Urban Economic Agents: A Comparative Analysis of High-Performance New Entrepreneurs," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 35(4), pages 5-22, December.
    19. Xiaodong Xu & Jingping Liu & Ning Xu & Wei Wang & Hui Yang, 2018. "Quantitative Study on the Evolution Trend and Driving Factors of Typical Rural Spatial Morphology in Southern Jiangsu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    20. Rosyi Damayanti T. Manningtyas & Katsunori Furuya, 2022. "Traditional Ecological Knowledge versus Ecological Wisdom: Are They Dissimilar in Cultural Landscape Research?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11778-:d:664148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.