IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p11638-d661893.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nature-Based Solutions: Thermal Comfort Improvement and Psychological Wellbeing, a Case Study in Genoa, Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca Mosca

    (Dipartimento Architettura e Design, Università degli Studi di Genova, 16123 Genoa, Italy)

  • Giulia Maria Dotti Sani

    (Dipartimento di Scienze Sociali e Politiche, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy)

  • Andrea Giachetta

    (Dipartimento Architettura e Design, Università degli Studi di Genova, 16123 Genoa, Italy)

  • Katia Perini

    (Dipartimento Architettura e Design, Università degli Studi di Genova, 16123 Genoa, Italy)

Abstract

The urban heat island (UHI) effect is among the most critical issues caused by human activities and high building density. UHI has severe impacts on the urban and natural environment as well as on human health and wellbeing. The research presented here aims at evaluating the effects of nature-based solutions (NBS) in improving the livability of a district in the city of Genoa, which is heavily cemented and a major example of the heat island phenomenon. This study focuses on the microclimatic benefits of urban heat island mitigation as well as on psychological and perceptual aspects. A preliminary analysis of the district through CFD simulations using Envi-met software allowed for selection of the most suitable areas for a system of punctual interventions in urban regeneration using nature-based solutions. For each area identified, we simulated the effects of different design scenarios on microclimate mitigation and thermal comfort improvement. In addition, to evaluate the perceptual benefits of the most well-performing design scenarios, we set up a web-based survey that was administered to a convenience sample of Genoa residents. In terms of aesthetic satisfaction and perception of improved conditions of physical and psychological well-being, the preferred design outcomes were those which emphasized a freer and more natural environment. This study shows that nature-based solutions can improve the overall conditions of dense urban areas; microclimate performance and psychological effects should be both considered in the design process in order to improve the wellbeing of urban citizens.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca Mosca & Giulia Maria Dotti Sani & Andrea Giachetta & Katia Perini, 2021. "Nature-Based Solutions: Thermal Comfort Improvement and Psychological Wellbeing, a Case Study in Genoa, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11638-:d:661893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11638/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11638/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdul Naser Majidi & Zoran Vojinovic & Alida Alves & Sutat Weesakul & Arlex Sanchez & Floris Boogaard & Jeroen Kluck, 2019. "Planning Nature-Based Solutions for Urban Flood Reduction and Thermal Comfort Enhancement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-27, November.
    2. Owen Douglas & Paula Russell & Mark Scott, 2019. "Positive perceptions of green and open space as predictors of neighbourhood quality of life: implications for urban planning across the city region," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(4), pages 626-646, March.
    3. Stefano Cascone, 2019. "Green Roof Design: State of the Art on Technology and Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-27, May.
    4. Serdar Celik & Ayla Ogus Binatli, 2018. "Energy Savings and Economic Impact of Green Roofs: A Pilot Study," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(8), pages 1778-1792, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gülşah Kaçmaz Akkurt & Seda Şemsiyeci, 2024. "Evaluation of Nature-Based Solutions to Improve the Urban Microclimate in Mediterranean Climate Conditions: A Case Study of Izmir-Karsıyaka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Živa Ravnikar & Alfonso Bahillo & Barbara Goličnik Marušić, 2023. "A Protocol for Microclimate-Related Street Assessment and the Potential of Detailed Environmental Data for Better Consideration of Microclimatology in Urban Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Vidya Anderson & Manavvi Suneja & Jelena Dunjic, 2023. "Sensing and Measurement Techniques for Evaluation of Nature-Based Solutions: A State-of-the-Art Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-39, July.
    4. Katia Perini & Chiara Calise & Paola Castellari & Enrica Roccotiello, 2022. "Microclimatic and Environmental Improvement in a Mediterranean City through the Regeneration of an Area with Nature-Based Solutions: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Floris C. Boogaard & Guri Venvik & Rui L. Pedroso de Lima & Ana C. Cassanti & Allard H. Roest & Antal Zuurman, 2020. "ClimateCafé: An Interdisciplinary Educational Tool for Sustainable Climate Adaptation and Lessons Learned," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Gülşah Kaçmaz Akkurt & Seda Şemsiyeci, 2024. "Evaluation of Nature-Based Solutions to Improve the Urban Microclimate in Mediterranean Climate Conditions: A Case Study of Izmir-Karsıyaka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Jiacheng Shi & Yu Yan & Mingxuan Li & Long Zhou, 2024. "Measuring the Convergence and Divergence in Urban Street Perception among Residents and Tourists through Deep Learning: A Case Study of Macau," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, March.
    4. Manso, Maria & Teotónio, Inês & Silva, Cristina Matos & Cruz, Carlos Oliveira, 2021. "Green roof and green wall benefits and costs: A review of the quantitative evidence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    5. Ángel Pitarch & María José Ruá & Lucía Reig & Inés Arín, 2020. "Contribution of Roof Refurbishment to Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Zhang, Dayong & Zhang, Zhiwei & Managi, Shunsuke, 2019. "A bibliometric analysis on green finance: Current status, development, and future directions," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 425-430.
    7. Nessa Winston, 2022. "Sustainable community development: Integrating social and environmental sustainability for sustainable housing and communities," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 191-202, February.
    8. Maria Luíza Santos & Cristina Matos Silva & Filipa Ferreira & José Saldanha Matos, 2023. "Hydrological Analysis of Green Roofs Performance under a Mediterranean Climate: A Case Study in Lisbon, Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Gianfranco Rizzo & Laura Cirrincione & Maria La Gennusa & Giorgia Peri & Gianluca Scaccianoce, 2023. "Green Roofs’ End of Life: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Natalia Sergeevna Shushunova & Elena Anatolyevna Korol & Nikolai Ivanovich Vatin, 2021. "Modular Green Roofs for the Sustainability of the Built Environment: The Installation Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Patrice Cannavo & Mathieu Artous & Olivier Lemmel & Hervé Buord & Laure Vidal-Beaudet & René Guénon, 2022. "Agronomic Evaluation of Recycled Polyurethane Foam-Based Growing Media for Green Roofs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Bevilacqua, Piero, 2021. "The effectiveness of green roofs in reducing building energy consumptions across different climates. A summary of literature results," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    13. Paul Christoph Gembarski & Jan Melching & Stefan Plappert, 2023. "A Knowledge-Based Engineering System for the Planning of Networked Rainwater Harvesting and Distribution Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, May.
    14. Yu Zhang & Lei Zhang & Luyao Ma & Qinglin Meng & Peng Ren, 2019. "Cooling Benefits of an Extensive Green Roof and Sensitivity Analysis of Its Parameters in Subtropical Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Lei Li & Ali Cheshmehzangi & Faith Ka Shun Chan & Christopher D. Ives, 2021. "Mapping the Research Landscape of Nature-Based Solutions in Urbanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-41, April.
    16. Shengnan Yang & Laddaporn Ruangpan & Arlex Sanchez Torres & Zoran Vojinovic, 2023. "Multi-objective Optimisation Framework for Assessment of Trade-Offs between Benefits and Co-benefits of Nature-based Solutions," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(6), pages 2325-2345, May.
    17. Julia Wójcik-Madej & Barbara Sowińska-Świerkosz, 2022. "Pre-Existing Interventions as NBS Candidates to Address Societal Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, August.
    18. Bevilacqua, Piero & Bruno, Roberto & Arcuri, Natale, 2020. "Green roofs in a Mediterranean climate: energy performances based on in-situ experimental data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1414-1430.
    19. Nessa Winston, 2021. "Sustainable community development: Integrating social and environmental sustainability for sustainable housing and communities," Working Papers 202106, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    20. Irene Zluwa & Ulrike Pitha, 2021. "The Combination of Building Greenery and Photovoltaic Energy Production—A Discussion of Challenges and Opportunities in Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11638-:d:661893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.