IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i19p11029-d650154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Soil Colour to Estimate Soil Organic Carbon Using a Large-Scale Citizen Science-Based Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Nerea Ferrando Jorge

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AB, UK)

  • Joanna Clark

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AB, UK)

  • Macarena L. Cárdenas

    (Earthwatch Institute, Oxford OX2 7DE, UK)

  • Hilary Geoghegan

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AB, UK)

  • Vicky Shannon

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AB, UK)

Abstract

Rapid, low-cost methods for large-scale assessments of soil organic carbon (SOC) are essential for climate change mitigation. Our work explores the potential for citizen scientists to gather soil colour data as a cost-effective proxy of SOC instead of conventional lab analyses. The research took place during a 2-year period using topsoil data gathered by citizen scientists and scientists from urban parks in the UK and France. We evaluated the accuracy and consistency of colour identification by comparing “observed” Munsell soil colour estimates to “measured” colour derived from reflectance spectroscopy, and calibrated colour observations to ensure data robustness. Statistical relationships between carbon content obtained by loss on ignition (LOI) and (i) observed and (ii) measured soil colour were derived for SOC prediction using three colour components: hue, lightness, and chroma. Results demonstrate that although the spectrophotometer offers higher precision, there was a correlation between observed and measured colour for both scientists (R 2 = 0.42; R 2 = 0.26) and citizen scientists (R 2 = 0.39; R 2 = 0.19) for lightness and chroma, respectively. Foremost, a slightly stronger relationship was found for predicted SOC using the spectrophotometer (R 2 = 0.69), and citizen scientists produced comparable results (R 2 = 0.58), highlighting the potential of a large-scale citizen-based approach for SOC monitoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Nerea Ferrando Jorge & Joanna Clark & Macarena L. Cárdenas & Hilary Geoghegan & Vicky Shannon, 2021. "Measuring Soil Colour to Estimate Soil Organic Carbon Using a Large-Scale Citizen Science-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:11029-:d:650154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/11029/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/11029/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theodora Angelopoulou & Athanasios Balafoutis & George Zalidis & Dionysis Bochtis, 2020. "From Laboratory to Proximal Sensing Spectroscopy for Soil Organic Carbon Estimation—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-24, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sergi Maicas & Jaume Segura-Garcia, 2023. "Spatial Study of Enzymatic Activities from Bacterial Isolates in a Mediterranean Urban Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Jérôme Ngao & Macarena L. Cárdenas & Thierry Améglio & Jérôme Colin & Marc Saudreau, 2021. "Implications of Urban Land Management on the Cooling Properties of Urban Trees: Citizen Science and Laboratory Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Snapp, Sieglinde, 2022. "Embracing variability in soils on smallholder farms: New tools and better science," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    2. George Kyriakarakos & Theodoros Petropoulos & Vasso Marinoudi & Remigio Berruto & Dionysis Bochtis, 2024. "Carbon Farming: Bridging Technology Development with Policy Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Efthymios Rodias & Eirini Aivazidou & Charisios Achillas & Dimitrios Aidonis & Dionysis Bochtis, 2020. "Water-Energy-Nutrients Synergies in the Agrifood Sector: A Circular Economy Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Francisco Javier Esquivel & José Antonio Esquivel & Antonio Morgado & José L. Romero-Béjar & Luis F. García del Moral, 2022. "Preprocessing of Spectroscopic Data Using Affine Transformations to Improve Pattern-Recognition Analysis: An Application to Prehistoric Lithic Tools," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Lwandile Nduku & Cilence Munghemezulu & Zinhle Mashaba-Munghemezulu & Wonga Masiza & Phathutshedzo Eugene Ratshiedana & Ahmed Mukalazi Kalumba & Johannes George Chirima, 2024. "Field-Scale Winter Wheat Growth Prediction Applying Machine Learning Methods with Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Imagery and Soil Properties," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, February.
    6. Charisios Achillas & Dionysis Bochtis, 2020. "Toward a Green, Closed-Loop, Circular Bioeconomy: Boosting the Performance Efficiency of Circular Business Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-6, December.
    7. Stanisław Gruszczyński & Wojciech Gruszczyński, 2022. "Assessing the Information Potential of MIR Spectral Signatures for Prediction of Multiple Soil Properties Based on Data from the AfSIS Phase I Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-22, November.
    8. Chaoqun Chen & Qigang Jiang & Zhenchao Zhang & Pengfei Shi & Yan Xu & Bin Liu & Jing Xi & ShouZhi Chang, 2020. "Hyperspectral Inversion of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contents in Soil Based on Continuum Removal and Wavelet Packet Decomposition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, May.
    9. Javier Reyes & Mareike Ließ, 2023. "On-the-Go Vis-NIR Spectroscopy for Field-Scale Spatial-Temporal Monitoring of Soil Organic Carbon," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, August.
    10. Massimo Conforti & Gabriele Buttafuoco, 2022. "Insights into the Effects of Study Area Size and Soil Sampling Density in the Prediction of Soil Organic Carbon by Vis-NIR Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy in Two Forest Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Konstantinos Karyotis & Theodora Angelopoulou & Nikolaos Tziolas & Evgenia Palaiologou & Nikiforos Samarinas & George Zalidis, 2021. "Evaluation of a Micro-Electro Mechanical Systems Spectral Sensor for Soil Properties Estimation," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:11029-:d:650154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.