IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i19p10718-d644053.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of Emergency Supplies Scheduling for Hazardous Chemicals Storage Considering Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Jianfeng Lu

    (Business Administration College, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330108, China)

  • Xiaoxia Wang

    (College of Civil and Traffic Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Jiahong Zhao

    (College of Civil and Traffic Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

Abstract

Hazardous chemicals are harmful to the people around them during their storage, especially when an accident occurs. The allocation and scheduling of emergency materials, therefore, is an important imperative of emergency rescue services. Due to the harmful characteristics of dangerous goods, the storage risk of hazardous chemicals in emergency networks always exists, which threatens surrounding residents. To reduce the risk of hazardous chemicals storage in terms of emergency networks, the collaborative optimization of emergency materials allocation and scheduling from the perspective of risk is proposed in the present study. The risk assessment of dangerous goods storage in different stages is developed. Minimizing the total cost and risk, a bi-level programming model of emergency material allocation and scheduling for dangerous goods storage is formulated. Then, the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) condition is introduced to transform the proposed model, and the solution method is designed based on an augmented ε-constraint method. Finally, the computational case is provided to demonstrate the workability of the proposed model and method.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianfeng Lu & Xiaoxia Wang & Jiahong Zhao, 2021. "Optimization of Emergency Supplies Scheduling for Hazardous Chemicals Storage Considering Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10718-:d:644053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10718/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10718/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Youqiang Sun & Yeqing Ren & Xingjuan Cai, 2020. "Biobjective Emergency Logistics Scheduling Model Based on Uncertain Traffic Conditions," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-15, January.
    2. Huang Xing, 2016. "The Optimization Model of Earthquake Emergency Supplies Collecting with the Limited Period and Double-Level Multihub," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-12, May.
    3. Ann Melissa Campbell & Dieter Vandenbussche & William Hermann, 2008. "Routing for Relief Efforts," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 127-145, May.
    4. Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung & Cheng, Hsin-Jung & Huang, Tsung Dow, 2007. "Multi-objective optimal planning for designing relief delivery systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 673-686, November.
    5. G Barbarosoǧlu & Y Arda, 2004. "A two-stage stochastic programming framework for transportation planning in disaster response," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(1), pages 43-53, January.
    6. Wei Wang & Li Huang & Zhaoxia Guo, 2017. "Optimization of Emergency Material Dispatch from Multiple Depot Locations to Multiple Disaster Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-8, October.
    7. Thomas M. Brody & Paisly Di Bianca & Jan Krysa, 2012. "Analysis of Inland Crude Oil Spill Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Emergency Response in the Midwest United States," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(10), pages 1741-1749, October.
    8. Equi, Luisa & Gallo, Giorgio & Marziale, Silvia & Weintraub, Andres, 1997. "A combined transportation and scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 94-104, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiao Yao & Beibei Xie & Xiurong Wu & Cong Zhang, 2023. "Two-Level Programming Model Based on Cooperative Operation Study of Stakeholders in Hazardous Chemical Storage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Kaigong Zhao & Xiaolei Zhang & Hui Wang & Yongling Gai & Haiyan Wang, 2022. "Allocation of Resources for Emergency Response to Coal-to-Oil Hazardous Chemical Accidents under Railway Transportation Mode," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Jieyin Lyu & Shouqin Zhou & Jingang Liu & Bingchun Jiang, 2023. "Intelligent-Technology-Empowered Active Emergency Command Strategy for Urban Hazardous Chemical Disaster Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-28, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Özdamar, Linet & Ertem, Mustafa Alp, 2015. "Models, solutions and enabling technologies in humanitarian logistics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 55-65.
    2. A. Anaya-Arenas & J. Renaud & A. Ruiz, 2014. "Relief distribution networks: a systematic review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 223(1), pages 53-79, December.
    3. de la Torre, Luis E. & Dolinskaya, Irina S. & Smilowitz, Karen R., 2012. "Disaster relief routing: Integrating research and practice," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 88-97.
    4. Nihal Berktaş & Bahar Yetiş Kara & Oya Ekin Karaşan, 2016. "Solution methodologies for debris removal in disaster response," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 4(3), pages 403-445, September.
    5. Li, Xiaoping & Batta, Rajan & Kwon, Changhyun, 2017. "Effective and equitable supply of gasoline to impacted areas in the aftermath of a natural disaster," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 25-34.
    6. Huang, Michael & Smilowitz, Karen R. & Balcik, Burcu, 2013. "A continuous approximation approach for assessment routing in disaster relief," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 20-41.
    7. Huang, Michael & Smilowitz, Karen & Balcik, Burcu, 2012. "Models for relief routing: Equity, efficiency and efficacy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 2-18.
    8. Nilay Noyan & Burcu Balcik & Semih Atakan, 2016. "A Stochastic Optimization Model for Designing Last Mile Relief Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 1092-1113, August.
    9. Rodolfo Modrigais Strauss Nunes & Susana Carla Farias Pereira, 2022. "Intellectual structure and trends in the humanitarian operations field," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1099-1157, December.
    10. Lu, Chung-Cheng & Ying, Kuo-Ching & Chen, Hui-Ju, 2016. "Real-time relief distribution in the aftermath of disasters – A rolling horizon approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 1-20.
    11. Wilson, Duncan T. & Hawe, Glenn I. & Coates, Graham & Crouch, Roger S., 2013. "A multi-objective combinatorial model of casualty processing in major incident response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(3), pages 643-655.
    12. Eghbal Akhlaghi, Vahid & Campbell, Ann Melissa, 2022. "The two-echelon island fuel distribution problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(3), pages 999-1017.
    13. Shaoqing Geng & Yu Gong & Hanping Hou & Jianliang Yang & Bhakti Stephan Onggo, 2024. "Resource management in disaster relief: a bibliometric and content-analysis-based literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 343(1), pages 263-292, December.
    14. Rennemo, Sigrid Johansen & Rø, Kristina Fougner & Hvattum, Lars Magnus & Tirado, Gregorio, 2014. "A three-stage stochastic facility routing model for disaster response planning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 116-135.
    15. Ali Ekici & Okan Örsan Özener, 2020. "Inventory routing for the last mile delivery of humanitarian relief supplies," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 42(3), pages 621-660, September.
    16. Yanyan Wang & Mingshu Lyu & Baiqing Sun, 2024. "Emergency resource allocation considering the heterogeneity of affected areas during the COVID-19 pandemic in China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    17. Caunhye, Aakil M. & Nie, Xiaofeng & Pokharel, Shaligram, 2012. "Optimization models in emergency logistics: A literature review," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 4-13.
    18. Najafi, Mehdi & Eshghi, Kourosh & Dullaert, Wout, 2013. "A multi-objective robust optimization model for logistics planning in the earthquake response phase," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 217-249.
    19. Moddassir Khan Nayeem & Gyu M. Lee, 2021. "Robust Design of Relief Distribution Networks Considering Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-24, August.
    20. Biplab Bhattacharya & Li Lin & Rajan Batta & Pavani K. Ram, 2020. "Stock-out severity index: tool for evaluating inequity in drug stock-outs," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(4), pages 1243-1263, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10718-:d:644053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.