IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9867-d627835.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Challenge-Based Learning Experience in Industrial Engineering in the Framework of Education 4.0

Author

Listed:
  • Yadira Gutiérrez-Martínez

    (School of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Calle del Puente 222, Ejidos de Huipulco, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14380, Mexico)

  • Rogelio Bustamante-Bello

    (School of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Calle del Puente 222, Ejidos de Huipulco, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14380, Mexico)

  • Sergio A. Navarro-Tuch

    (School of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Calle del Puente 222, Ejidos de Huipulco, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14380, Mexico)

  • Ariel A. López-Aguilar

    (School of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Calle del Puente 222, Ejidos de Huipulco, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14380, Mexico)

  • Arturo Molina

    (School of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Calle del Puente 222, Ejidos de Huipulco, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14380, Mexico)

  • Inés Álvarez-Icaza Longoria

    (School of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Calle del Puente 222, Ejidos de Huipulco, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14380, Mexico)

Abstract

Current tendencies of product, project and services development focus on a higher consideration of the User Experience (UX). Therefore, traditional training and teaching methodologies need to adapt to prepare the students to develop strategies for problem solving for their professional education. Such needs have risen and interest in tendencies such as education and Industry 4.0 has grown. This paper presents and analyzes the process and results of a teaching implementation methodology based on Challenge-Based Learning (CBL). The paper describes the process followed, explaining the methodology precedents that led to the final implementation case. It also mentions previous experiments on product analysis and home automation developments that are linked to implementation of the technology. This case’s implementation, analysis and experimentation integrated the use of Emotional Domotics (ED) Tools for the UX analysis, to grant feedback and compare the students’ results with the bio-metrical and emotional computational analysis. The methodology, described through this document, allowed the students to better understand and experience some of the implications of an interconnected system with instant information feedback. This allowed them to better grasp part of the impact that the tendency towards the Internet of Things (IoT) is currently having, and the impact of the improvement proposals from the students.

Suggested Citation

  • Yadira Gutiérrez-Martínez & Rogelio Bustamante-Bello & Sergio A. Navarro-Tuch & Ariel A. López-Aguilar & Arturo Molina & Inés Álvarez-Icaza Longoria, 2021. "A Challenge-Based Learning Experience in Industrial Engineering in the Framework of Education 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-25, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9867-:d:627835
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9867/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9867/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya & María Isabel Loaiza-Aguirre & Alexandra Zúñiga-Ojeda & May Portuguez-Castro, 2021. "Characterization of the Teaching Profile within the Framework of Education 4.0," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Christian Kraft, 2012. "User Experience Innovation," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-1-4302-4150-8, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emily Costan & Gamaliel Gonzales & Roselyn Gonzales & Lynne Enriquez & Felix Costan & Decem Suladay & Nadine May Atibing & Joerabell Lourdes Aro & Samantha Shane Evangelista & Fatima Maturan & Egberto, 2021. "Education 4.0 in Developing Economies: A Systematic Literature Review of Implementation Barriers and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Chun-Wei Chen & Neng-Tang Huang & Hsien-Sheng Hsiao, 2022. "The Construction and Application of E-Learning Curricula Evaluation Metrics for Competency-Based Teacher Professional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Celia Paola Sarango-Lapo & Juanjo Mena & María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya, 2021. "Evidence-Based Educational Innovation Model Linked to Digital Information Competence in the Framework of Education 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Emily Abd Rahman & Melor Md Yunus & Harwati Hashim & Nur Khadirah Ab. Rahman, 2022. "Learner Autonomy between Students and Teachers at a Defence University: Perception vs. Expectation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Bakytgul Jugembayeva & Aliya Murzagaliyeva & Gita Revalde, 2022. "Pedagogical Model for Raising Students’ Readiness for the Transition to University 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Jia Zhang & Qinan Huang & Jianmei Xu, 2022. "The Relationships among Transformational Leadership, Professional Learning Communities and Teachers’ Job Satisfaction in China: What Do the Principals Think?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Aleksandra Stupar & Predrag Jovanović & Jelena Ivanović Vojvodić, 2020. "Strengthening the Social Sustainability of Super-Blocks: Belgrade’s Emerging Urban Hubs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, January.
    8. Carolin Eckinger & M.W.J.L. Sanders, 2019. "User Innovation and Business Incubation," Working Papers 19-16, Utrecht School of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9867-:d:627835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.