Author
Listed:
- Qi Yan
(The Office of Principal, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)
- Licheng Li
(Chemical Engineering Experiment Center, Jiangsu Higher Education Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center Construction Point, College of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)
- Muhua Chen
(Chemical Engineering Experiment Center, Jiangsu Higher Education Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center Construction Point, College of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)
- Xiaoli Gu
(The Academic Affairs Office, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)
Abstract
This study examines the Chemical Engineering and Technology major at Nanjing Forestry University as a case study to explore a sustainable improvement and development model for the major, grounded in the principles of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) and the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) framework. In the context of new engineering education and integrating the core concepts of engineering professional education accreditation, this research merges the OBE concept with the PDCA model to promote the sustainable enhancement of the Chemical Engineering and Technology major. The objective is to assess the effectiveness of this professional construction model based on the OBE and PDCA framework in fostering the sustainable development of students. The findings indicate that by establishing a cultivation system aligned with the new economy, restructuring the interdisciplinary curriculum, and implementing a diversified evaluation system, it is feasible to nurture high-quality technical engineering talents equipped with social responsibility, teamwork skills, innovative thinking, and an awareness of sustainable development. This study demonstrates that this professional construction mechanism and model significantly contribute to developing sustainable education, enhancing engineering practice and innovative awareness, and cultivating applied innovative talents among students. Furthermore, this study not only offers new insights for specialty construction but also serves as a practical reference for improving teaching quality and meeting societal demands.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4051-:d:1646699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.