IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2020i1p275-d470558.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Green Creativity for Employees in Green Enterprises: Scale Development and Validation

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Jiang

    (School of Information Management and Artificial Intelligence, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China
    School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Kaichao Wang

    (School of Information Management and Artificial Intelligence, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Zhibin Lu

    (School of Information Management and Artificial Intelligence, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Yifei Liu

    (School of Information Management and Artificial Intelligence, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Yu Wang

    (Institute of Science and Technology for Development of Shandong, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250014, China)

  • Gang Li

    (Shandong Computer Science Center (National Supercomputer Center in Jinan), Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250014, China)

Abstract

Although employee green creativity is recognized as the key to the innovation in green enterprises, few studies explores the measurement of green creativity for employees. To address the gap, the present study identifies the major dimensions of employee green creativity and develops a comprehensive, reliable, and valid measurement instrument. According to the 4P’s model of creativity, four core dimensions of employee green creativity are identified, namely, green creative motivation, thinking, behavior, and outcome. Strictly adhering to the process of scale development, employee green creativity scale (EGCS) is constructed and validated. We first develop the items of employee green creativity based on literature review and expertise from academics and practitioners. Next, we examine the validation of EGCS through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis using a sample from three large-scale green enterprises (N = 460). Further, we also check the nomological validity of EGCS by testing the effects of determinants (e.g., green transformational leadership, shared vision, and green self-efficacy) on employee green creativity using a new sample from another two green enterprises (N = 169). Results reveal that EGCS is a reliable and valid instrument for capturing employee green creativity in multiple contexts. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Jiang & Kaichao Wang & Zhibin Lu & Yifei Liu & Yu Wang & Gang Li, 2020. "Measuring Green Creativity for Employees in Green Enterprises: Scale Development and Validation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:275-:d:470558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/275/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/275/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu-Shan Chen & Tai-Wei Chang & Chun-Yu Lin & Pi-Yu Lai & Kuan-Hung Wang, 2016. "The Influence of Proactive Green Innovation and Reactive Green Innovation on Green Product Development Performance: The Mediation Role of Green Creativity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Wenhao Song & Hongyan Yu, 2018. "Green Innovation Strategy and Green Innovation: The Roles of Green Creativity and Green Organizational Identity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(2), pages 135-150, March.
    3. Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Hsun Chang & Yu-Hsien Lin, 2014. "The Determinants of Green Radical and Incremental Innovation Performance: Green Shared Vision, Green Absorptive Capacity, and Green Organizational Ambidexterity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Weiwei Huo & Xianmiao Li & Manyi Zheng & Yan Liu & Jinyi Yan, 2020. "Commitment to Human Resource Management of the Top Management Team for Green Creativity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Hsun Chang & Shu-Ling Yeh & Hsin-I Cheng, 2015. "Green shared vision and green creativity: the mediation roles of green mindfulness and green self-efficacy," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 1169-1184, May.
    6. Jianfeng Jia & Huanxin Liu & Tachia Chin & Dongqing Hu, 2018. "The Continuous Mediating Effects of GHRM on Employees’ Green Passion via Transformational Leadership and Green Creativity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Tariq, Adeel & Badir, Yuosre F. & Tariq, Waqas & Bhutta, Umair Saeed, 2017. "Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 8-23.
    8. Wengang Zhang & Feng Xu & Xuefeng Wang, 2020. "How Green Transformational Leadership Affects Green Creativity: Creative Process Engagement as Intermediary Bond and Green Innovation Strategy as Boundary Spanner," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Mittal, Swati & Dhar, Rajib Lochan, 2016. "Effect of green transformational leadership on green creativity: A study of tourist hotels," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 118-127.
    10. Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Hsun Chang, 2013. "The Determinants of Green Product Development Performance: Green Dynamic Capabilities, Green Transformational Leadership, and Green Creativity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 107-119, August.
    11. Rodrigo Lozano, 2014. "Creativity and Organizational Learning as Means to Foster Sustainability," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(3), pages 205-216, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farzana Riva & Solon Magrizos & Mohammad Rabiul Basher Rubel, 2021. "Investigating the link between managers' green knowledge and leadership style, and their firms' environmental performance: The mediation role of green creativity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3228-3240, November.
    2. Wengang Zhang & Feng Xu & Xuefeng Wang, 2020. "How Green Transformational Leadership Affects Green Creativity: Creative Process Engagement as Intermediary Bond and Green Innovation Strategy as Boundary Spanner," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Wenchang Fang & Tzong-Hann Wu & Tai-Wei Chang & Cheng-Ze Hung, 2021. "What Could Entrepreneurial Vision Do for Sustainable Development? Explore the Cross-Level Impact of Organizational Members’ Green Shared Vision on Green Creativity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Sajjad Ahmad Afridi & Asad Shahjehan & Sania Zaheer & Wajid Khan & Ali Gohar, 2023. "Bridging Generative Leadership and Green Creativity: Unpacking the Role of Psychological Green Climate and Green Commitment in the Hospitality Industry," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    5. Yuechao Du & Minghao Yan, 2022. "Green Transformational Leadership and Employees’ Taking Charge Behavior: The Mediating Role of Personal Initiative and the Moderating Role of Green Organizational Identity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Hien Vo Van & Tu Thanh Hoai & Nha Nguyen Minh & Nguyen Phong Nguyen, 2023. "Green Transformational Leadership and Green Mindfulness as Contributors to Green Innovation and Environmental Performance: Evidence From Manufacturing Firms in Vietnam," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    7. Chunyan Chen & Anmol Rasheed & Arslan Ayub, 2023. "Does Green Mindfulness Promote Green Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Tai-Wei Chang & Fei-Fan Chen & Hua-Dong Luan & Yu-Shan Chen, 2019. "Effect of Green Organizational Identity, Green Shared Vision, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment on Green Product Development Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Tai-Wei Chang & Cheng-Ze Hung, 2021. "How to Shape the Employees’ Organization Sustainable Green Knowledge Sharing: Cross-Level Effect of Green Organizational Identity Effect on Green Management Behavior and Performance of Members," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Yu‐Shan Chen & Shu‐Hsien Lin & Chun‐Yu Lin & Shu‐Tzu Hung & Chih‐Wei Chang & Ching‐Wen Huang, 2020. "Improving green product development performance from green vision and organizational culture perspectives," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 222-231, January.
    11. Samuel Adomako & Nguyen Phong Nguyen, 2023. "Green creativity, responsible innovation, and product innovation performance: A study of entrepreneurial firms in an emerging economy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4413-4425, November.
    12. Wengang Zhang & Baiqing Sun & Feng Xu, 2020. "Promoting Green Product Development Performance via Leader Green Transformationality and Employee Green Self-Efficacy: The Moderating Role of Environmental Regulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Tai-Wei Chang, 2020. "Corporate Sustainable Development Strategy: Effect of Green Shared Vision on Organization Members’ Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-20, April.
    14. Adil Mansoor & Muhammad Farrukh & Jong-Keon Lee & Sarwat Jahan, 2021. "Stimulation of Employees’ Green Creativity through Green Transformational Leadership and Management Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    15. Wenhao Song & Yingying Ma & Xiucheng Fan & Xuerong Peng, 2023. "Corporate environmental ethics and employee's green creativity? The perspective of environmental commitment," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1856-1868, July.
    16. Mercedes Úbeda‐García & Bartolome Marco‐Lajara & Patrocinio C. Zaragoza‐Sáez & Encarnación Manresa‐Marhuenda & Esther Poveda‐Pareja, 2022. "Green ambidexterity and environmental performance: The role of green human resources," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 32-45, January.
    17. Saira Begum & Muhammad Ashfaq & Enjun Xia & Usama Awan, 2022. "Does green transformational leadership lead to green innovation? The role of green thinking and creative process engagement," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 580-597, January.
    18. Jian Zhu & Weihang Tang & Bin Zhang & Hui Wang, 2022. "Influence of Environmentally Specific Transformational Leadership on Employees’ Green Innovation Behavior—A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    19. Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Giudice, Manlio Del & Chierici, Roberto & Graziano, Domenico, 2020. "Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    20. Shunyi Zhou & Dapeng Zhang & Chan Lyu & Hongfeng Zhang, 2018. "Does Seeing “Mind Acts Upon Mind” Affect Green Psychological Climate and Green Product Development Performance? The Role of Matching Between Green Transformational Leadership and Individual Green Valu," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:275-:d:470558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.