IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10301-d459511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Integrative and Sustainable Workplace Mobility Plan: The Case Study of Navantia-Cartagena (Spain)

Author

Listed:
  • Pilar Jiménez

    (Department of Mining and Civil Engineering, Technical University of Cartagena, 30203 Cartagena, Spain)

  • David María-Dolores

    (Department of Mining and Civil Engineering, Technical University of Cartagena, 30203 Cartagena, Spain)

  • Stephany Beltrán

    (Department of Mining and Civil Engineering, Technical University of Cartagena, 30203 Cartagena, Spain)

Abstract

The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals have been the strategic aims of many interventions in society recently. Navantia has developed a Sustainable Workplace Mobility Plan motivated by Sustainable Development Goal 11, Sustainable cities. Navantia is a leading Spanish company in the design and construction of high technology military and civilian vessels. This project is focused on the Navantia facilities in Cartagena. A workplace mobility plan has been developed to encourage sustainable mobility, promoting access on foot, by bike, by scooter, and using public transport to travel to and from the company’s facilities. The methodology used is based on the European Guidelines for developing and implementing a sustainable urban mobility plan. Thus, the current accesses and their mobility characteristics have been studied in detail, and surveys have been conducted among the company’s employees. A diagnosis of the situation has been elaborated. To solve the identified problems, three sets of measures have been developed: (i) improved access measures; (ii) management of car park areas; and (iii) soft measures. The economic cost of all these measures has been estimated, as well as the related carbon savings. As a result, a complete sustainable workplace mobility plan has been designed from an integrated point of view to encourage sustainable mobility, not only for the company’s employees but also for all the inhabitants of Cartagena, to transform the city into a place with good quality of life now and in the future. This practical case can serve as a reference for other companies that want to foster sustainable mobility among their employees, even when they are subject to urban constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Pilar Jiménez & David María-Dolores & Stephany Beltrán, 2020. "An Integrative and Sustainable Workplace Mobility Plan: The Case Study of Navantia-Cartagena (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10301-:d:459511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10301/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10301/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cairns, S. & Newson, C. & Davis, A., 2010. "Understanding successful workplace travel initiatives in the UK," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 473-494, August.
    2. Romanika Okraszewska & Aleksandra Romanowska & Marcin Wołek & Jacek Oskarbski & Krystian Birr & Kazimierz Jamroz, 2018. "Integration of a Multilevel Transport System Model into Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Arsenio, Elisabete & Martens, Karel & Di Ciommo, Floridea, 2016. "Sustainable urban mobility plans: Bridging climate change and equity targets?," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 30-39.
    4. Guzman, Luis A. & Arellana, Julian & Alvarez, Vilma, 2020. "Confronting congestion in urban areas: Developing Sustainable Mobility Plans for public and private organizations in Bogotá," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 321-335.
    5. Bartle, Caroline & Chatterjee, Kiron, 2019. "Employer perceptions of the business benefits of sustainable transport: A case study of peri-urban employment areas in South West England," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 297-313.
    6. Maja Kiba-Janiak & Jarosław Witkowski, 2019. "Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans: How Do They Work?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.
    7. Roby, Helen, 2010. "Workplace travel plans: past, present and future," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 23-30.
    8. Banister, David, 2008. "The sustainable mobility paradigm," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 73-80, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Uroš Kramar & Dejan Dragan & Darja Topolšek, 2019. "The Holistic Approach to Urban Mobility Planning with a Modified Focus Group, SWOT, and Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-29, November.
    2. Radoje Vujadinović & Jelena Šaković Jovanović & Aljaž Plevnik & Luka Mladenovič & Tom Rye, 2021. "Key Challenges in the Status Analysis for the Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan in Podgorica, Montenegro," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-28, January.
    3. Hrelja, Robert & Isaksson, Karolina & Richardson, Tim, 2013. "Choosing conflict on the road to sustainable mobility: A risky strategy for breaking path dependency in urban policy making," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 195-205.
    4. Julio César dos Santos & Paulo Ribeiro & Ricardo Jorge Silva Bento, 2023. "A Review of the Promotion of Sustainable Mobility of Workers by Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Daniel Kaszubowski, 2019. "A Method for the Evaluation of Urban Freight Transport Models as a Tool for Improving the Delivery of Sustainable Urban Transport Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Deveci, Muhammet & Pamucar, Dragan & Gokasar, Ilgin & Isik, Mehtap & Coffman, D'Maris, 2022. "Fuzzy Einstein WASPAS approach for the economic and societal dynamics of the climate change mitigation strategies in urban mobility planning," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1-17.
    7. Oana Luca & Florian Gaman & Emanuel Răuță, 2021. "Towards a National Harmonized Framework for Urban Plans and Strategies in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Chen, Peng & Yang, Xiankui, 2023. "Revisit employer-based travel demand management: A longitudinal analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 22-31.
    9. Audrius Dėdelė & Auksė Miškinytė, 2021. "Promoting Sustainable Mobility: A Perspective from Car and Public Transport Users," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Malgorzata Mrozik & Agnieszka Merkisz-Guranowska, 2025. "Sustainable Transport and Selected Environmental Assessment Tools," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 635-645.
    11. Sławomir Dorocki & Dorota Wantuch-Matla, 2021. "Power Two-Wheelers as an Element of Sustainable Urban Mobility in Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-25, June.
    12. Timmer, Sebastian & Merfeld, Katrin & Henkel, Sven, 2023. "Exploring motivations for multimodal commuting: A hierarchical means-end chain analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    13. Marco Mazzarino & Lucio Rubini, 2019. "Smart Urban Planning: Evaluating Urban Logistics Performance of Innovative Solutions and Sustainable Policies in the Venice Lagoon—the Results of a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-27, August.
    14. Hansel, Julia, 2025. "Governing mobility hubs in the sustainable urban mobility transition: Dynamics of stability and change," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 323-334.
    15. Kębłowski, Wojciech & Dobruszkes, Frédéric & Boussauw, Kobe, 2022. "Moving past sustainable transport studies: Towards a critical perspective on urban transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 74-83.
    16. Laurent Van Malderen & Bart Jourquin & Isabelle Thomas & Thomas Vanoutrive & Ann Verhetsel & Frank Witlox, 2011. "Employer Mobility Plans: Acceptability, Efficiency And Costs," ERSA conference papers ersa10p291, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Reigner, Hélène & Brenac, Thierry, 2019. "Safe, sustainable… but depoliticized and uneven – A critical view of urban transport policies in France," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 218-234.
    18. Tiziana Campisi & Nurten Akgün & Dario Ticali & Giovanni Tesoriere, 2020. "Exploring Public Opinion on Personal Mobility Vehicle Use: A Case Study in Palermo, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, July.
    19. Maksymilian Mądziel & Tiziana Campisi, 2023. "Investigation of Vehicular Pollutant Emissions at 4-Arm Intersections for the Improvement of Integrated Actions in the Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, January.
    20. Bakare, Bukola & Motuba, Diomo & Szmerekovsky, Joseph, 2022. "Do corporate social responsibility ratings have any effect on traffic congestion?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 98-119.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10301-:d:459511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.