IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i16p6689-d400679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodology for Assessment of Alternative Waste Treatment Strategies Using Entropy Weights

Author

Listed:
  • Zakariya Kaneesamkandi

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ateekh Ur Rehman

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Yusuf Siraj Usmani

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Usama Umer

    (Advanced Manufacturing Institute, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Energy recovery from municipal solid waste is one of the means to attain sustainable development. Multiple factors involving several location specific situations, both measurable and intangible, makes decision making for technology selection very difficult. In this paper, a multi criterion evaluation system for municipal solid waste treatment strategies is established on the basis of specific, measurable, attainable, relevant and trackable situations, to prove the effectiveness of this method. From among various alternatives, three prominent strategies, namely, incineration, anaerobic digestion and composting are considered for the evaluation. Exhaustive data collection is done from conducting field studies, as well as from published data. Three types of communities are evaluated by this technique, namely, typical cities in developed countries, ‘A’ grade cities in India and ‘B’ grade cities in India. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of community specific situations on the right choice of waste disposal method using a technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) approach, where weights of criteria are determined by means of entropy weight method. The case study shows that the proposed evaluation results are reliable, which are more coincident with the reality, since the most relevant factors for selection have been used backed by exhaustive field data collection. Policy makers gain from the outcome of this study by guiding them through technology selection. So, the adopted approach should be promoted widely in the evaluation of waste treatment strategies, to realize sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Zakariya Kaneesamkandi & Ateekh Ur Rehman & Yusuf Siraj Usmani & Usama Umer, 2020. "Methodology for Assessment of Alternative Waste Treatment Strategies Using Entropy Weights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:16:p:6689-:d:400679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/16/6689/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/16/6689/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manfredi Saeli & Rosa Micale & Maria Paula Seabra & João A. Labrincha & Giada La Scalia, 2020. "Selection of Novel Geopolymeric Mortars for Sustainable Construction Applications Using Fuzzy Topsis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Lin Ding & Zhenfeng Shao & Hanchao Zhang & Cong Xu & Dewen Wu, 2016. "A Comprehensive Evaluation of Urban Sustainable Development in China Based on the TOPSIS-Entropy Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Mihai, Florin-Constantin & Apostol, Liviu, 2012. "Disparities in municipal waste management across EU-27. A geographical approach," MPRA Paper 61289, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2012.
    4. Veerasekar Palaniappan Sambasivam & Gowtham Thiyagarajan & Golam Kabir & Syed Mithun Ali & Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Zhang Yu, 2020. "Selection of Winter Season Crop Pattern for Environmental-Friendly Agricultural Practices in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Rand, T. & Haukohl, J. & Maxen, U., 2000. "Municipal Solid Waste Incineration. Requirements for a Successful Project," Papers 462, World Bank - Technical Papers.
    6. Jolanta Jarnicka & Piotr Żebrowski, 2019. "Learning in greenhouse gas emission inventories in terms of uncertainty improvement over time," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 1143-1168, August.
    7. Michael O. Ukoba & Ogheneruona E. Diemuodeke & Mohammed Alghassab & Henry I. Njoku & Muhammad Imran & Zafar A. Khan, 2020. "Composite Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Optimization of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems for Geopolitical Zones in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-27, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mingtao Wang & Chunming Ye & Dingkun Zhang, 2022. "Evaluation of Green Manufacturing Level in China’s Provincial Administrative Regions Based on Combination Weighting Method and TOPSIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Liang Zhang & Xubing Zhang & Shenggu Yuan & Kai Wang, 2021. "Economic, Social, and Ecological Impact Evaluation of Traffic Network in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration Based on the Entropy Weight TOPSIS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pin Li & Jinsuo Zhang, 2019. "Is China’s Energy Supply Sustainable? New Research Model Based on the Exponential Smoothing and GM(1,1) Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-30, January.
    2. Qunxi Gong & Min Chen & Xianli Zhao & Zhigeng Ji, 2019. "Sustainable Urban Development System Measurement Based on Dissipative Structure Theory, the Grey Entropy Method and Coupling Theory: A Case Study in Chengdu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Florin-Constantin Mihai & Liviu Apostol & Adrian Ursu & Pavel Ichim, 2012. "Vulnerability of mountain rivers to waste dumping from Neamț County, Romania," Post-Print hal-01150942, HAL.
    4. Mihai, Florin-Constantin, 2012. "Quantitative assessment method of illegal dumping în small rivers. Case study: Neamt County, Romania," MPRA Paper 61455, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2012.
    5. Weiwei Li & Pingtao Yi & Danning Zhang, 2018. "Sustainability Evaluation of Cities in Northeastern China Using Dynamic TOPSIS-Entropy Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Mihai, Florin-Constantin, 2012. "Geography of waste as a new approach in waste management study," MPRA Paper 61343, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2012.
    7. Ying Zhou & Weiwei Li & Pingtao Yi & Chengju Gong, 2019. "Evaluation of City Sustainability from the Perspective of Behavioral Guidance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Wasiu Olalekan Idris & Mohd Zamri Ibrahim & Aliashim Albani, 2020. "The Status of the Development of Wind Energy in Nigeria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Hongqiang Wang & Linlin Zheng & Yingjie Zhang, 2022. "Research on Dynamic Comprehensive Evaluation of Metropolitan Area Development Level Based on Quadratic Weighting: A Case Study of Four Metropolitan Areas in the Yangtze River Delta Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Jia Guo & Shiyan Ma & Xiang Li, 2022. "Exploring the Differences of Sustainable Urban Development Levels from the Perspective of Multivariate Functional Data Analysis: A Case Study of 33 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    11. Wang, Mengmeng & Zhou, Tao, 2022. "Understanding the dynamic relationship between smart city implementation and urban sustainability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    12. Zhenshan Yang, 2019. "Sustainability of Urban Development with Population Decline in Different Policy Scenarios: A Case Study of Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-17, November.
    13. Fang‐Li Ruan & Liang Yan, 2022. "Challenges facing indicators to become a universal language for sustainable urban development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 41-57, February.
    14. Mihai, Florin-Constantin, 2012. "Improper Household Waste Disposal in Rural Territory. Case Study: Neamţ County, Romania," MPRA Paper 61453, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2012.
    15. Kamali Saraji, Mahyar & Aliasgari, Elahe & Streimikiene, Dalia, 2023. "Assessment of the challenges to renewable energy technologies adoption in rural areas: A Fermatean CRITIC-VIKOR approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    16. Adam Pawlewicz & Katarzyna Pawlewicz, 2023. "The Risk of Agricultural Land Abandonment as a Socioeconomic Challenge for the Development of Agriculture in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    17. Chenchen Shi & Naliang Guo & Xiaoping Zhu & Feng Wu, 2022. "Assessing Urban Resilience from the Perspective of Scaling Law: Evidence from Chinese Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, October.
    18. Mihai, Florin-Constantin, 2013. "Performance assessment method of urban waste management systems from Neamț County, Romania," MPRA Paper 61286, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2013.
    19. Vanden Eynde, Oliver & Wren-Lewis, Liam, 2021. "Complementarities in Infrastructure: Evidence from Rural India," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb) 2104, CEPREMAP.
    20. Grażyna Bartkowiak & Agnieszka Krugiełka & Paulina Kostrzewa-Demczuk & Ryszard Dachowski & Katarzyna Gałek-Bracha, 2022. "Experiencing Stress among Different Professional Groups in the Context of Their Age," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-15, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:16:p:6689-:d:400679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.