IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i16p6604-d399277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utilization of Spider Plants ( Gynandropsis gynandra , L. Briq) amongst Farming Households and Consumers of Northern Namibia

Author

Listed:
  • Barthlomew Yonas Chataika

    (Crop Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Namibia, Oshakati 15001, Namibia)

  • Levi Shadeya-Mudogo Akundabweni

    (Crop Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Namibia, Oshakati 15001, Namibia)

  • Enoch G. Achigan-Dako

    (Laboratory of Genetics, Horticulture and Seed Science, Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, University of Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou 00229, Benin)

  • Julia Sibiya

    (School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa)

  • Kingdom Kwapata

    (Department of Horticulture, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe 206110, Malawi)

Abstract

Spider plants ( Gynandropsis gynandra , L. Briq.) are a semi-wild vegetable reported to have high nutritional, medicinal, insecticidal, and cultural values, yet continue to be neglected in research. The study was undertaken to investigate indigenous knowledge and utilization of the species in five regions of northern Namibia. Three tools were used; (i) focus group discussion, (ii) semi-structured interviews involving a random selection of 100 farming households and 24 consumers, and (iii) key informant interviews involving four agricultural staff and two open-market supervisors. Data were subjected to descriptive statistics, inferential, and cluster analyses. The study found that farming households and consumers placed higher nutritional, sociocultural, and medicinal values in spider plants than any other vegetable. Ranking of utilization traits, such as nutritional, sociocultural, and medicinal use, revealed three clusters of sociolinguistic groups associated with geographical region. The vegetable was sold and used in most cultural, traditional, and religious functions as a relish, as a source of honor, to bring luck, and for protection. The diverse uses and value placed on spider plants could offer an opportunity for the development of technologies for enhancing their domestication, production, and utilization. It is recommended that follow-up studies be carried to identify specific sociocultural and geographic factors affecting the use of spider plants.

Suggested Citation

  • Barthlomew Yonas Chataika & Levi Shadeya-Mudogo Akundabweni & Enoch G. Achigan-Dako & Julia Sibiya & Kingdom Kwapata, 2020. "Utilization of Spider Plants ( Gynandropsis gynandra , L. Briq) amongst Farming Households and Consumers of Northern Namibia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:16:p:6604-:d:399277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/16/6604/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/16/6604/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rugube, Lovemore M. & Nsibande, Sifisile P. & Masarirambi, Michael T. & Musi, Patricia J., 2019. "Factors Affecting Profitability of Smallholder Vegetable Farmers in the Shiselweni Region, Kingdom of Eswatini (Swaziland)," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(1).
    2. Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi & Vimbayi G. P. Chimonyo & Albert T. Modi, 2017. "Status of Underutilised Crops in South Africa: Opportunities for Developing Research Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Nikolett Nemeth & Ildiko Rudnak & Prespa Ymeri & Csaba Fogarassy, 2019. "The Role of Cultural Factors in Sustainable Food Consumption—An Investigation of the Consumption Habits among International Students in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-27, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asuamah Yeboah, Samuel, 2023. "Sustaining Change: Unravelling the Socio-cultural Threads of Sustainable Consumption," MPRA Paper 117981, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Jun 2023.
    2. Phiri, Isaac, 2020. "The effect of access to finance on commercialisation of smallholder maize farmers in Eswatini," Research Theses 334755, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    3. Xie Ling & Muhammad Faisal Shahzad & Zia ul Abrar & Jamshid Khan Khattak, 2021. "Determinants of the Intention to Purchase Branded Meat: Mediation of Brand Trust," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    4. Concetta Cardillo & Orlando Cimino, 2022. "Small Farms in Italy: What Is Their Impact on the Sustainability of Rural Areas?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-25, November.
    5. Vimbayi Grace Petrova Chimonyo & Tendai Polite Chibarabada & Dennis Junior Choruma & Richard Kunz & Sue Walker & Festo Massawe & Albert Thembinkosi Modi & Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, 2022. "Modelling Neglected and Underutilised Crops: A Systematic Review of Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Abiodun Olusola Omotayo & Adeyemi Oladapo Aremu, 2020. "Evaluation of Factors Influencing the Inclusion of Indigenous Plants for Food Security among Rural Households in the North West Province of South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Hemalatha Palanivel & Shipra Shah, 2021. "Unlocking the inherent potential of plant genetic resources: food security and climate adaptation strategy in Fiji and the Pacific," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14264-14323, October.
    8. Kinga Nagy-Pércsi & Csaba Fogarassy, 2019. "Important Influencing and Decision Factors in Organic Food Purchasing in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Nyarai M. Mujuru & Ajuruchukwu Obi, 2020. "Effects of Cultivated Area on Smallholder Farm Profits and Food Security in Rural Communities of the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Katherine Kent & Denis Visentin & Corey Peterson & Carmen Primo & Catherine Elliott & Margaret Otlowski & Sandra Murray, 2021. "The Perceived Importance and Intended Purchasing Patterns of Sustainable Foods in Australian University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Arindam Das & Pia A. Albinsson, 2023. "Consumption Culture and Critical Sustainability Discourses: Voices from the Global South," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi & Tendai Polite Chibarabada & Vimbayi Grace Petrova Chimonyo & Vongai Gillian Murugani & Laura Maureen Pereira & Nafiisa Sobratee & Laurencia Govender & Rob Slotow & Albert The, 2018. "Mainstreaming Underutilized Indigenous and Traditional Crops into Food Systems: A South African Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Konrád Kiss & Csaba Ruszkai & Katalin Takács-György, 2019. "Examination of Short Supply Chains Based on Circular Economy and Sustainability Aspects," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-21, September.
    14. Hillary Mugiyo & Vimbayi G. P. Chimonyo & Mbulisi Sibanda & Richard Kunz & Cecilia R. Masemola & Albert T. Modi & Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, 2021. "Evaluation of Land Suitability Methods with Reference to Neglected and Underutilised Crop Species: A Scoping Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, January.
    15. Dolapo B. Adelabu & Angelinus C. Franke, 2022. "The Beneficial Effects of Insect Pollination and Biochar Seed Coating on Okra ( Abelmoschus esculentus ) Seed Quality at Varying Temperature Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Seretny Marek & Gaur Deepika & Sobczyk Katarzyna & Kaabour Maya, 2021. "Creating a New, Sustainable Mindset through Responsible Consumption: A Case Study of the International Chain of Sustainable Restaurants," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 49-56, January.
    17. Racheal Akinola & Laura Maureen Pereira & Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi & Francia-Marié de Bruin & Loubie Rusch, 2020. "A Review of Indigenous Food Crops in Africa and the Implications for more Sustainable and Healthy Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-30, April.
    18. Csaba Ruszkai & Ilona Pajtók Tari & Csaba Patkós, 2021. "Possible Actors in Local Foodscapes? LEADER Action Groups as Short Supply Chain Agents—A European Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    19. Nyathi, M.K. & Mabhaudhi, T. & Van Halsema, G.E. & Annandale, J.G. & Struik, P.C., 2019. "Benchmarking nutritional water productivity of twenty vegetables - A review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 248-259.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:16:p:6604-:d:399277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.