IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i3p722-d201988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complexity in Education for Sustainable Consumption—An Educational Data Mining Approach using Mysteries

Author

Listed:
  • Jens Christian Benninghaus

    (Geography Education, Fakultät für Erziehungswissenschaft, Universität Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
    Department for Biology Education, IPN-Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, 24118 Kiel, Germany)

  • Andreas Mühling

    (Department of Computer Science, Kiel University, Christian-Albrechts-Platz 4, 24118 Kiel, Germany)

  • Kerstin Kremer

    (Department for Biology Education, IPN-Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, 24118 Kiel, Germany)

  • Sandra Sprenger

    (Geography Education, Fakultät für Erziehungswissenschaft, Universität Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany)

Abstract

Systems thinking is one of the skills necessary for sustainable behavior, especially regarding sustainable consumption. Students are faced with complexity and uncertainty while taking part in it and other daily life aspects. There is a need to foster their competence in this field. From a classroom point of view, the mystery method is an example for implementing education for sustainable consumption and working with complex and uncertain content. With the mystery method students construct an influence diagram, which consists of concepts and requires several skills, especially in decision-making. Using these diagrams as a form of assessment is desirable but also very difficult, because of the mentioned complexity and uncertainty that is part of the task itself. The study presented here tackles this problem by creating an expert based reference diagram that has been constructed with the help of educational data mining. The result shows that it is possible to derive such a reference even if parts remain ambiguous due to the inherent complexity. The reference may now be used to assess students’ systems thinking abilities, which will be undertaken in future research. Beside this, the reference can be used as a reflective tool in lessons, so students can compare their own content knowledge and discuss differences to the experts’ reference.

Suggested Citation

  • Jens Christian Benninghaus & Andreas Mühling & Kerstin Kremer & Sandra Sprenger, 2019. "Complexity in Education for Sustainable Consumption—An Educational Data Mining Approach using Mysteries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:722-:d:201988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/722/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/722/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonja Maria Geiger & Daniel Fischer & Ulf Schrader, 2018. "Measuring What Matters in Sustainable Consumption: An Integrative Framework for the Selection of Relevant Behaviors," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 18-33, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nina Roczen & Frank Fischer & Janis Fögele & Johannes Hartig & Rainer Mehren, 2021. "Measuring System Competence in Education for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Kelley E. Dugan & Erika A. Mosyjowski & Shanna R. Daly & Lisa R. Lattuca, 2022. "Systems thinking assessments in engineering: A systematic literature review," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 840-866, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hazem Ahmed Khairy & Yehia Elzek & Nadir Aliane & Mohamed Fathy Agina, 2023. "Perceived Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Effect on Green Perceived Value and Green Attitude in Hospitality and Tourism Industry: The Mediating Role of Environmental Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Chun-Wei Chen, 2023. "A Feasibility Discussion: Is ML Suitable for Predicting Sustainable Patterns in Consumer Product Preferences?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Carmen Bălan, 2020. "How Does Retail Engage Consumers in Sustainable Consumption? A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    4. Tobias Engelmann & Daniel Fischer & Marianne Lörchner & Jaya Bowry & Holger Rohn, 2019. "“Doing” Sustainability Assessment in Different Consumption and Production Contexts—Lessons from Case Study Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Deidre Bauer & Julia Arnold & Kerstin Kremer, 2018. "Consumption-Intention Formation in Education for Sustainable Development: An Adapted Model Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Muhammad Awais & Tanzila Samin & Muhammad Awais Gulzar & Jinsoo Hwang & Muhammad Zubair, 2020. "Unfolding the Association between the Big Five, Frugality, E-Mavenism, and Sustainable Consumption Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, January.
    7. Ana La Rosa & Jennifer Johnson Jorgensen, 2021. "Influences on Consumer Engagement with Sustainability and the Purchase Intention of Apparel Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, September.
    8. S. M. Shafiul Alam & K. M. Zahidul Islam, 2021. "Examining the role of environmental corporate social responsibility in building green corporate image and green competitive advantage," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Sunyang Park & Yuri Lee, 2020. "Scale Development of Sustainable Consumption of Clothing Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Monica-Maria Tomșa & Andreea-Ioana Romonți-Maniu & Mircea-Andrei Scridon, 2021. "Is Sustainable Consumption Translated into Ethical Consumer Behavior?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Nanjangud Vishwanath Vighnesh & Patil Balachandra & Deepak Chandrashekar & Sukanlaya Sawang, 2023. "How cultural values influence sustainable consumption behavior? An empirical investigation in a non‐Western context," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 990-1007, April.
    12. Ellen Lee & Franzisca Weder, 2021. "Framing Sustainable Fashion Concepts on Social Media. An Analysis of #slowfashionaustralia Instagram Posts and Post-COVID Visions of the Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Hamieda Parker & Waheed Akbar Bhatti & Agnieszka Chwialkowska & Thiam Marais, 2023. "Factors influencing green purchases: An emerging market perspective," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 865-876, April.
    14. Edwin Chukwuemeka Idoko & Chukwunonso Oraedu & Christian Chidera Ugwuanyi & Stephen Ikechukwu Ukenna, 2021. "Determinants of Smart Meter on Sustainable Energy Consumption Behavior: A Developing Country Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    15. Eunjung Lim & Shin Arita & Soonhee Joung, 2019. "Advancing Sustainable Consumption in Korea and Japan—From Re-Orientation of Consumer Behavior to Civic Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-22, November.
    16. Civilai Leckie & Daniel Rayne & Lester W. Johnson, 2021. "Promoting Customer Engagement Behavior for Green Brands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-22, July.
    17. Mihai Dinu & Simona Roxana Pătărlăgeanu & Radu Petrariu & Marius Constantin & Ana-Mădălina Potcovaru, 2020. "Empowering Sustainable Consumer Behavior in the EU by Consolidating the Roles of Waste Recycling and Energy Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-24, November.
    18. Stefan Cibulka & Stefan Giljum, 2020. "Towards a Comprehensive Framework of the Relationships between Resource Footprints, Quality of Life, and Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Christine Kreuzer & Susanne Weber & Mona Off & Tobias Hackenberg & Chiara Birk, 2019. "Shedding Light on Realized Sustainable Consumption Behavior and Perceived Barriers of Young Adults for Creating Stimulating Teaching–Learning Situations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Žaneta Piligrimienė & Andželika Žukauskaitė & Hubert Korzilius & Jūratė Banytė & Aistė Dovalienė, 2020. "Internal and External Determinants of Consumer Engagement in Sustainable Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:722-:d:201988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.