IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i3p580-d200021.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Can Street Art Have Economic Value?

Author

Listed:
  • Fabiana Forte

    (Department of Architecture and Industrial Design, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via San Lorenzo ad Septimum, 81031 Aversa, Italy)

  • Pierfrancesco De Paola

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples “Federico II”, Piazzale Vincenzo Tecchio 80, 80125 Naples, Italy)

Abstract

The following paper analyzes the phenomenon of Street Art with particular attention to the increasing correlation between practices of Street Art and socio-economic dynamics. From the perspective of recognizing a possible formulation of the economic value of Street Art, the paper aims to describe the impacts which Street Art is having in some urban contexts, where the regeneration processes have found in this new form of “re-signification” an innovative modality of intervention. Some impacts have economic nature (direct, indirect or inducted), others are only social and cultural. Starting from an overview concerning the impacts of Street Art on the property market in several urban contexts, a first evaluation of what is happening in some neighborhoods of the metropolitan city of Naples is presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabiana Forte & Pierfrancesco De Paola, 2019. "How Can Street Art Have Economic Value?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-11, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:580-:d:200021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/580/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/580/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stuart Cameron & Jon Coaffee, 2005. "Art, Gentrification and Regeneration -- From Artist as Pioneer to Public Arts," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 39-58, April.
    2. Vincenzo Del Giudice & Pierfrancesco De Paola & Benedetto Manganelli & Fabiana Forte, 2017. "The Monetary Valuation of Environmental Externalities through the Analysis of Real Estate Prices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Stuart Cameron & Jon Coaffee, 2005. "Art, Gentrification and Regeneration - From Artist as Pioneer to Public Arts," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 39-58.
    4. Fabiana Forte & Luigi Fusco Girard, 2009. "Creativity and new architectural assets: the complex value of beauty," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(2/3/4), pages 160-191.
    5. Carl Grodach & Nicole Foster & James Murdoch, 2014. "Gentrification and the Artistic Dividend: The Role of the Arts in Neighborhood Change," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 80(1), pages 21-35, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ludovico Centis & Ezio Micelli, 2021. "Regenerating Places outside the Metropolis. A Reading of Three Global Art-Related Processes and Development Trajectories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Andreea-Loreta Cercleux, 2021. "Street Art Participation in Increasing Investments in the City Center of Bucharest, a Paradox or Not?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Marco Boffi & Nicola Rainisio & Paolo Inghilleri, 2023. "Nurturing Cultural Heritages and Place Attachment through Street Art—A Longitudinal Psycho-Social Analysis of a Neighborhood Renewal Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.
    4. María José Piñeira Mantiñán & Francisco R. Durán Villa & Ramón López Rodríguez, 2020. "Citizen Action as a Driving Force of Change. The Meninas of Canido, Art in the Street as an Urban Dynamizer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carl Grodach & Nicole Foster & James Murdoch, 2018. "Gentrification, displacement and the arts: Untangling the relationship between arts industries and place change," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(4), pages 807-825, March.
    2. Elizabeth A. Mack & Emily Talen & Julia Koschinsky, 2017. "Walkable Art: An Empirical Investigation of Arts-Related Businesses and Walkable Neighborhoods," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 31(2), pages 149-163, May.
    3. Velma Zahirovic-Herbert & Karen M Gibler, 2022. "The effect of film production studios on housing prices in Atlanta, the Hollywood of the South," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(4), pages 771-788, March.
    4. Gregor Wolbring & Fatima Jamal Al-Deen, 2021. "Social Role Narrative of Disabled Artists and Both Their Work in General and in Relation to Science and Technology," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, August.
    5. Shen, Tiyan & Yao, Xinyi & Wen, Fenghua, 2021. "The Urban Regeneration Engine Model: An analytical framework and case study of the renewal of old communities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Bereitschaft, Bradley, 2020. "Gentrification and the evolution of commuting behavior within America's urban cores, 2000–2015," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Pier Luigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli & Giorgio Tavano Blessi & Massimiliano Nuccio, 2013. "Culture as an Engine of Local Development Processes: System-Wide Cultural Districts II: Prototype Cases," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 571-588, December.
    8. Stefano Bloch, 2016. "Why do Graffiti Writers Write on Murals? The Birth, Life, and Slow Death of Freeway Murals in Los Angeles," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 451-471, March.
    9. Jan Suchacek, 2019. "The Benefit of Failure: On the Development of Ostrava’s Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    10. Heather E. McLean, 2014. "Cracks in the Creative City: The Contradictions of Community Arts Practice," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 2156-2173, November.
    11. Roberta Comunian & Alessandra Faggian, 2011. "Higher Education and the Creative City," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Åke E. Andersson & Charlotta Mellander (ed.), Handbook of Creative Cities, chapter 10, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Vanessa Mathews, 2014. "Incoherence and Tension in Culture-Led Redevelopment," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 1019-1036, May.
    13. Thomas Sigler & David Wachsmuth, 2020. "New directions in transnational gentrification: Tourism-led, state-led and lifestyle-led urban transformations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(15), pages 3190-3201, November.
    14. David J. Madden, 2014. "Neighborhood as Spatial Project: Making the Urban Order on the Downtown Brooklyn Waterfront," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 471-497, March.
    15. Harvey Molotch & Mark Treskon, 2009. "Changing Art: SoHo, Chelsea and the Dynamic Geography of Galleries in New York City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 517-541, June.
    16. Meghan Ashlin Rich & William Tsitsos, 2016. "Avoiding the ‘SoHo Effect’ in Baltimore: Neighborhood Revitalization and Arts and Entertainment Districts," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 736-756, July.
    17. Arnoud Lagendijk & Rianne Melik & Freek Haan & Huib Ernste & Huub Ploegmakers & Serap Kayasu, 2014. "Comparative Approaches to Gentrification: A Research Framework," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(3), pages 358-365, July.
    18. Loretta Lees & David Ley, 2008. "Introduction to Special Issue on Gentrification and Public Policy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2379-2384, November.
    19. Emil van Eck & Iris Hagemans & Jan Rath, 2020. "The ambiguity of diversity: Management of ethnic and class transitions in a gentrifying local shopping street," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(16), pages 3299-3314, December.
    20. Kasey Zapatka & Brenden Beck, 2021. "Does demand lead supply? Gentrifiers and developers in the sequence of gentrification, New York City 2009–2016," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(11), pages 2348-2368, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:580-:d:200021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.