IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i2p427-d197900.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Melissa Jackson

    (School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, QLD, Australia
    Cities Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan 4111, QLD, Australia)

  • Rodney A. Stewart

    (School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, QLD, Australia
    Cities Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan 4111, QLD, Australia)

  • Kelly S. Fielding

    (School of Communication and Arts, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4067, QLD, Australia
    School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4067, QLD, Australia)

  • Jessie Cochrane

    (Water Corporation, Perth 6007, WA, Australia)

  • Cara D. Beal

    (Cities Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan 4111, QLD, Australia
    School of Medicine, Griffith University, Nathan 4111, QLD, Australia)

Abstract

Indigenous peoples living in remote areas are often reliant on Governments for essential services and local economic development opportunities. Collaboration and partnership in resource planning and management is espoused as an approach that can provide multiple benefits for all stakeholders including more robust and long-lasting decisions, relationship-building and trust between government and community members as well as capacity building and empowerment of citizens. In Australia however, little evidence from the remote Indigenous community context is available to inform successful collaborations. This paper presents novel research using thematic analysis of practitioner interviews and document review to analyse the current situation of service-provider- remote community engagement and collaboration for sustainable water and energy management. An adapted typology of Indigenous engagement is applied as an analytical framework, categorising water and energy management initiatives according to four key types, each with varying levels of collaboration and implications for sustainable water and energy. Application of the typology shows that technocratic approaches to community engagement continue to dominate this space as collaborative processes are constrained by a range of institutional, governance, technical and cultural factors. The findings have implications for research, policy and practice, and point to a need for a systemic approach to address barriers and facilitate genuine collaboration.

Suggested Citation

  • Melissa Jackson & Rodney A. Stewart & Kelly S. Fielding & Jessie Cochrane & Cara D. Beal, 2019. "Collaborating for Sustainable Water and Energy Management: Assessment and Categorisation of Indigenous Involvement in Remote Australian Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-30, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:427-:d:197900
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/427/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/427/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Howarth, Candice & Monasterolo, Irene, 2017. "Opportunities for knowledge co-production across the energy-food-water nexus: Making interdisciplinary approaches work for better climate decision making," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 103-110.
    2. Sue Jackson & Marcus Barber, 2013. "Recognition of indigenous water values in Australia's Northern Territory: current progress and ongoing challenges for social justice in water planning," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 435-454, December.
    3. William Nikolakis & R. Quentin Grafton, 2015. "Putting Indigenous water rights to work: the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework as a lens for remote development," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 149-163, April.
    4. Haroon Sseguya & Robert E. Mazur & Dorothy Masinde, 2009. "Harnessing Community Capitals for Livelihood Enhancement: Experiences From a Livelihood Program in Rural Uganda," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 123-138, June.
    5. Diver, Sibyl, 2017. "Negotiating Indigenous knowledge at the science-policy interface: Insights from the Xáxli’p Community Forest," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1-11.
    6. Alejandro Jiménez & Moa Cortobius & Marianne Kjellén, 2014. "Water, sanitation and hygiene and indigenous peoples: a review of the literature," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 277-293, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johan Larsson & Lisa Larsson, 2020. "Integration, Application and Importance of Collaboration in Sustainable Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Petru Lucian Curșeu & Sandra G.L. Schruijer, 2020. "Participation and Goal Achievement of Multiparty Collaborative Systems Dealing with Complex Problems: A Natural Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Andrew Kliskey & Paula Williams & David L. Griffith & Virginia H. Dale & Chelsea Schelly & Anna-Maria Marshall & Valoree S. Gagnon & Weston M. Eaton & Kristin Floress, 2021. "Thinking Big and Thinking Small: A Conceptual Framework for Best Practices in Community and Stakeholder Engagement in Food, Energy, and Water Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Kimberly Pugel & Amy Javernick-Will & Matthew Koschmann & Shawn Peabody & Karl Linden, 2020. "Adapting Collaborative Approaches for Service Provision to Low-Income Countries: Expert Panel Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jesem Douglas Yamall Orellana & Giovanna Gatica-Domínguez & Juliana dos Santos Vaz & Paulo Augusto Ribeiro Neves & Ana Claudia Santiago de Vasconcellos & Sandra de Souza Hacon & Paulo Cesar Basta, 2021. "Intergenerational Association of Short Maternal Stature with Stunting in Yanomami Indigenous Children from the Brazilian Amazon," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Andrew Kliskey & Paula Williams & David L. Griffith & Virginia H. Dale & Chelsea Schelly & Anna-Maria Marshall & Valoree S. Gagnon & Weston M. Eaton & Kristin Floress, 2021. "Thinking Big and Thinking Small: A Conceptual Framework for Best Practices in Community and Stakeholder Engagement in Food, Energy, and Water Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Veruska Muccione & Thomas Lontzek & Christian Huggel & Philipp Ott & Nadine Salzmann, 2023. "An application of dynamic programming to local adaptation decision-making," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 119(1), pages 523-544, October.
    4. Anna Adamik & Michał Nowicki & Andrius Puksas, 2022. "Energy Oriented Concepts and Other SMART WORLD Trends as Game Changers of Co-Production—Reality or Future?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-38, June.
    5. Naho Mirumachi & Margot Hurlbert, 2022. "Reflecting on twenty years of international agreements concerning water governance: insights and key learning," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 317-332, June.
    6. Jing Li & Guoqiang Ma & Jinghua Feng & Liying Guo & Yinzhou Huang, 2022. "Local Residents’ Social-Ecological Adaptability of the Qilian Mountain National Park Pilot, Northwestern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, May.
    7. O. Flores Baquero & J. Gallego-Ayala & R. Giné-Garriga & A. Jiménez-Fernández. Palencia & A. Pérez-Foguet, 2017. "The Influence of the Human Rights to Water and Sanitation Normative Content in Measuring the Level of Service," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 763-786, September.
    8. Thalía Turrén-Cruz & Juan Alejandro García-Rodríguez & Rodrigo E. Peimbert-García & Miguel Ángel López Zavala, 2020. "An Approach Incorporating User Preferences in the Design of Sanitation Systems and Its Application in the Rural Communities of Chiapas, Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Pelai, Ricardo & Hagerman, Shannon M. & Kozak, Robert, 2021. "Whose expertise counts? Assisted migration and the politics of knowledge in British Columbia’s public forests," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    10. Caiado Couto, Lilia & Campos, Luiza C. & da Fonseca-Zang, Warde & Zang, Joachim & Bleischwitz, Raimund, 2021. "Water, waste, energy and food nexus in Brazil: Identifying a resource interlinkage research agenda through a systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    11. Stephen Lauer & Matthew Sanderson, 2020. "Irrigated agriculture and human development: a county-level analysis 1980–2010," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4407-4423, June.
    12. Rachel Arsenault & Carrie Bourassa & Sibyl Diver & Deborah McGregor & Aaron Witham, 2019. "Including Indigenous Knowledge Systems in Environmental Assessments: Restructuring the Process," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 19(3), pages 120-132, August.
    13. Sibyl Diver & Daniel Ahrens & Talia Arbit & Karen Bakker, 2019. "Engaging Colonial Entanglements: “Treatment as a State†Policy for Indigenous Water Co-Governance," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 19(3), pages 33-56, August.
    14. Landriani, Loris & Agrifoglio, Rocco & Metallo, Concetta & Lepore, Luigi, 2022. "The role of knowledge in water service coproduction and policy implications," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Morgan, Edward A. & Osborne, Natalie & Mackey, Brendan, 2022. "Evaluating planning without plans: Principles, criteria and indicators for effective forest landscape approaches," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    16. Chris McDonald & Ana I. Moreno-Monroy & Laura-Sofia Springare, 2019. "Indigenous economic development and well-being in a place-based context," OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2019/01, OECD Publishing.
    17. Bryony M. Bowman & Dexter V. L. Hunt & Chris D. F. Rogers, 2022. "Gazing into the Crystal Ball: A Review of Futures Analysis to Promote Environmental Justice in the UK Water Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    18. González, Nidia Catherine & Kröger, Markus, 2020. "The potential of Amazon indigenous agroforestry practices and ontologies for rethinking global forest governance," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    19. Walter Leal Filho & Franziska Wolf & Edmond Totin & Luckson Zvobgo & Nicholas Philip Simpson & Kumbirai Musiyiwa & Jokastah W. Kalangu & Maruf Sanni & Ibidun Adelekan & Jackson Efitre & Felix Kwabena , 2023. "Is indigenous knowledge serving climate adaptation? Evidence from various African regions," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(2), March.
    20. Manero, Ana & Taylor, Kat & Nikolakis, William & Adamowicz, Wiktor & Marshall, Virginia & Spencer-Cotton, Alaya & Nguyen, Mai & Grafton, R. Quentin, 2022. "A systematic literature review of non-market valuation of Indigenous peoples’ values: Current knowledge, best-practice and framing questions for future research," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:427-:d:197900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.