IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i17p4687-d261727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lessons Learned from the Application of the UNIDO Eco-Industrial Park Toolbox in Viet Nam and Other Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Dick van Beers

    (United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Department of Environment, Industrial Resource Efficiency Division, Vienna International Centre, 1400 Vienna, Austria)

  • Alessandro Flammini

    (United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Department of Environment, Industrial Resource Efficiency Division, Vienna International Centre, 1400 Vienna, Austria)

  • Frédéric David Meylan

    (United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Department of Environment, Industrial Resource Efficiency Division, Vienna International Centre, 1400 Vienna, Austria)

  • Jérôme Stucki

    (United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Department of Environment, Industrial Resource Efficiency Division, Vienna International Centre, 1400 Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

The transformation of conventional industrial parks into eco-industrial parks (EIPs) presents an effective opportunity to attain inclusive and sustainable industrial development. UNIDO has acquired broad experience of EIPs by implementing a number of EIP projects in developing countries. To support these, a UNIDO EIP Toolbox was developed in order to (a) provide a practical set of customized and flexible tools to assist practitioners with the development and implementation of EIPs and related initiatives, and (b) to support EIP implementation and decision-making processes in relation to existing and new industrial parks. The EIP Toolbox currently covers tools on selecting industrial parks for EIP projects, stakeholder mapping, policy support, assessing industrial parks against the International EIP Framework, industrial symbiosis identification, monitoring impacts from company-level Resource Efficiency and Cleaner Production (RECP) assessments and park-level EIP opportunities. The focus of this paper is the application of the developed EIP tools in Viet Nam, supported by learnings from their application in other countries (e.g., China, Colombia, India, Morocco and Peru). The application of the EIP tools to date has demonstrated their value in contributing to the development and implementation of EIP practices. The added value of the tools is to support decision-making and stakeholder consultation processes on specific EIP topics of interest. An overall lesson learned from the tools’ applications is that they are useful in identifying and prioritizing “tip of the iceberg” symbiosis and RECP options as well as park-level EIP opportunities through interactive stakeholder consultations or workshops, possibly led by park management, and in guiding the discussion through a step-by-step structured approach. As such, rather than a stand-alone solution, the tools are best placed to be used as a supplementary instrument, in conjunction with other pragmatic and detailed implementation approaches. The current version of the UNIDO EIP Toolbox represents version 1.0. It is envisaged that the set of tools will be updated and expanded to reflect insights from their application in EIP projects. It is hoped that this paper will create further interest among EIP stakeholders and the academic community in applying the UNIDO EIP Toolbox as well as feedback from users in developing, transition and developed countries to further strengthen and expand the tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Dick van Beers & Alessandro Flammini & Frédéric David Meylan & Jérôme Stucki, 2019. "Lessons Learned from the Application of the UNIDO Eco-Industrial Park Toolbox in Viet Nam and Other Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4687-:d:261727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4687/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4687/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amtul Samie Maqbool & Francisco Mendez Alva & Greet Van Eetvelde, 2018. "An Assessment of European Information Technology Tools to Support Industrial Symbiosis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Doryn Negesa & Wei Cong & Lei Cheng & Lei Shi, 2022. "Development of eco‐industrial parks in Ethiopia: The case of Hawassa Industrial Park," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 1078-1093, June.
    2. Dick van Beers & Klaus Tyrkko & Alessandro Flammini & César Barahona & Christian Susan, 2020. "Results and Lessons Learned from Assessing 50 Industrial Parks in Eight Countries against the International Framework for Eco-Industrial Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-33, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. João Azevedo & Inês Ferreira & Rui Dias & Cristina Ascenço & Bruno Magalhães & Juan Henriques & Muriel Iten & Fernando Cunha, 2021. "Industrial Symbiosis Implementation Potential—An Applied Assessment Tool for Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Rui Dias & João Azevedo & Inês Ferreira & Marco Estrela & Juan Henriques & Cristina Ascenço & Muriel Iten, 2020. "Technical Viability Analysis of Industrial Synergies—An Applied Framework Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Juan Diego Henriques & João Azevedo & Rui Dias & Marco Estrela & Cristina Ascenço & Doroteya Vladimirova & Karen Miller, 2022. "Implementing Industrial Symbiosis Incentives: an Applied Assessment Framework for Risk Mitigation," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    4. Fraccascia, Luca, 2020. "Quantifying the direct network effect for online platforms supporting industrial symbiosis: an agent-based simulation study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Daniel Jato-Espino & Carmen Ruiz-Puente, 2020. "Fostering Circular Economy Through the Analysis of Existing Open Access Industrial Symbiosis Databases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    6. Margarida Soares & André Ribeiro & Tomás Vasconcelos & Manuel Barros & Carla Castro & Cândida Vilarinho & Joana Carvalho, 2023. "Challenges of Digital Waste Marketplace—The Upvalue Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Lucyna Łȩkawska-Andrinopoulou & Georgios Tsimiklis & Sarah Leick & Manuel Moreno Nicolás & Angelos Amditis, 2021. "Circular Economy Matchmaking Framework for Future Marketplace Deployment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Juan Henriques & Paulo Ferrão & Muriel Iten, 2022. "Policies and Strategic Incentives for Circular Economy and Industrial Symbiosis in Portugal: A Future Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-24, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4687-:d:261727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.