IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i4p1166-d140868.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fertilizer Effect of Phosphorus Recycling Products

Author

Listed:
  • Wilhelm Römer

    (Department of Crop Sciences, Section Plant Nutrition and Crop Physiology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Carl-Sprengel-Weg 1, 37075 Göttingen, Germany)

  • Bernd Steingrobe

    (Department of Crop Sciences, Section Plant Nutrition and Crop Physiology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Carl-Sprengel-Weg 1, 37075 Göttingen, Germany)

Abstract

Between 2004 and 2011 the German Government funded 17 different projects to develop techniques of phosphorus recycling from wastewater, sewage sludges, and sewage sludge ashes. Several procedures had been tested, such as precipitation, adsorption, crystallization, nano-filtration, electro-dialysis, wet oxidation, pyrolysis, ion exchange, or bioleaching. From these techniques, 32 recycling products were tested by five different institutes for their agronomic efficiency, that is, their plant availability, mainly in pot experiments. This manuscript summarizes and compares these results to evaluate the suitability of different technical approaches to recycle P from wastes into applicable fertilizers. In total, 17 products of recycled sewage sludge ashes (SSA), one meat and bone meal ash, one sinter product of meat and bone meal, one cupola furnace slag, nine Ca phosphates from crystallization or from precipitation, Seaborne-Ca-phosphates, Seaborne-Mg-phosphate, and 3 different struvites were tested in comparison to controls with water soluble P, that is, either single super phosphate (SSP) or triple super phosphate (TSP). Sandy and loamy soils (pH: 4.7–6.8; CAL-P: 33–49 ppm) were used. The dominant test plant was maize. Phosphorus uptake from fertilizer was calculated by the P content of fertilized plants minus P content of unfertilized plants. Calculated uptake from all products was set in relation to uptake from water soluble P fertilizers (SSP or TSP) as a reference value (=100%). The following results were found: (1) plants took up less than 25% P in 65% of all SSA (15 products); (2) 6 products (26%) resulted in P uptake of 25 and 50% relatively to water soluble P. Only one Mg-P product resulted in an uptake of 67%. With cupola furnace slag, 24% P uptake was reached on sandy soil and nearly the same value as TSP on loamy soil. The uptake results of Ca phosphates were between 0 and 50%. Mg-P products from precipitation processes consistently showed a better P supply in relation to comparable Ca-P compounds. With struvite the same P uptake as for water soluble P was reached. The fertilizer effect of the tested P recycling products can clearly be differentiated: TSP = struvite > Mg-P = sinter-P > Ca-P, cupola-slag > thermally treated sewage sludge ashes > meat-and-bone meal ash = Fe-P.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilhelm Römer & Bernd Steingrobe, 2018. "Fertilizer Effect of Phosphorus Recycling Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:1166-:d:140868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1166/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1166/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammad A. T. Alsheyab & Sigrid Kusch-Brandt, 2018. "Potential Recovery Assessment of the Embodied Resources in Qatar’s Wastewater," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Inga-Mareike Bach & Lisa Essich & Torsten Müller, 2021. "Efficiency of Recycled Biogas Digestates as Phosphorus Fertilizers for Maize," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Jolanta Latosińska & Przemysław Czapik, 2020. "The Ecological Risk Assessment and the Chemical Speciation of Heavy Metals in Ash after the Incineration of Municipal Sewage Sludge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Gerald Steiner & Bernhard Geissler, 2018. "Sustainable Mineral Resource Management—Insights into the Case of Phosphorus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-8, August.
    5. Isabel González-García & Berta Riaño & Beatriz Molinuevo-Salces & María Cruz García-González, 2023. "Effect of Alkali and Membrane Area on the Simultaneous Recovery of Nitrogen and Phosphorous from Digestate by Membrane Technology and Chemical Precipitation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Marzena Smol & Michał Preisner & Augusto Bianchini & Jessica Rossi & Ludwig Hermann & Tanja Schaaf & Jolita Kruopienė & Kastytis Pamakštys & Maris Klavins & Ruta Ozola-Davidane & Daina Kalnina & Elina, 2020. "Strategies for Sustainable and Circular Management of Phosphorus in the Baltic Sea Region: The Holistic Approach of the InPhos Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Raja, R. & Kumar, S., 2023. "Cupola slag as a green concrete-making material and its performance characteristics - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    8. Inga-Mareike Bach & Lisa Essich & Andrea Bauerle & Torsten Müller, 2022. "Efficiency of Phosphorus Fertilizers Derived from Recycled Biogas Digestate as Applied to Maize and Ryegrass in Soils with Different pH," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:1166-:d:140868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.