IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jstats/v8y2025i3p83-d1752494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Confidence Intervals of Risk Ratios for the Augmented Logistic Regression with Pseudo-Observations

Author

Listed:
  • Hiroyuki Shiiba

    (The Graduate Institute for Advanced Studies, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), 10-3 Midori-cho, Tachikawa 190-8562, Tokyo, Japan
    Clinical Planning and Development Department, Eisai Co., Ltd., 4-6-10 Koishikawa, Bunkyo-ku 112-8088, Tokyo, Japan)

  • Hisashi Noma

    (The Graduate Institute for Advanced Studies, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), 10-3 Midori-cho, Tachikawa 190-8562, Tokyo, Japan
    Department of Interdisciplinary Statistical Mathematics, The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 10-3 Midori-cho, Tachikawa 190-8562, Tokyo, Japan)

Abstract

The augmented logistic regression proposed by Diaz-Quijano directly provides risk ratios with an augmented dataset with the pseudo-observations. However, the standard errors of regression coefficients cannot be accurately estimated using either the ordinary model variance estimator or the robust variance estimator, as neither method appropriately accounts for the pseudo-observations. In this study, we proposed two resampling strategies based on the bootstrap and jackknife methods to construct improved variance estimators for the augmented logistic regression. Both procedures can reflect the overall uncertainty of the augmented dataset involving the pseudo-observations and require only standard software, making them feasible for a wide range of clinical and epidemiological researchers. We validated these proposed methods through comprehensive simulation studies, which demonstrated that both the bootstrap- and jackknife-based variance estimators provided smaller standard error estimates and correspondingly narrower 95% confidence intervals, whereas the robust variance estimator remained biased. Additionally, we applied the proposed methods to real-world binary data, confirming their practical utility.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiroyuki Shiiba & Hisashi Noma, 2025. "Confidence Intervals of Risk Ratios for the Augmented Logistic Regression with Pseudo-Observations," Stats, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-9, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:8:y:2025:i:3:p:83-:d:1752494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/8/3/83/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/8/3/83/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erich Battistin & Barbara Sianesi, 2011. "Misclassified Treatment Status and Treatment Effects: An Application to Returns to Education in the United Kingdom," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 93(2), pages 495-509, May.
    2. Alok Kumar Dwivedi & Indika Mallawaarachchi & Soyoung Lee & Patrick Tarwater, 2014. "Methods for estimating relative risk in studies of common binary outcomes," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 484-500, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nguimkeu, Pierre & Denteh, Augustine & Tchernis, Rusty, 2019. "On the estimation of treatment effects with endogenous misreporting," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 487-506.
    2. Engzell, Per, 2017. "What Do Books in the Home Proxy For? A Cautionary Tale," Working Paper Series 1/2016, Stockholm University, Swedish Institute for Social Research.
    3. Battistin, Erich & De Nadai, Michele & Sianesi, Barbara, 2014. "Misreported schooling, multiple measures and returns to educational qualifications," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 181(2), pages 136-150.
    4. Erich Battistin & Marco Ovidi, 2022. "Rising Stars: Expert Reviews and Reputational Yardsticks in the Research Excellence Framework," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 89(356), pages 830-848, October.
    5. Augustine Denteh & D'esir'e K'edagni, 2022. "Misclassification in Difference-in-differences Models," Papers 2207.11890, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    6. Erich Battistin & Agar Brugiavini & Enrico Rettore & Guglielmo Weber, 2009. "The Retirement Consumption Puzzle: Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Approach," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(5), pages 2209-2226, December.
    7. Lorenzo Almada & Ian McCarthy & Rusty Tchernis, 2016. "What Can We Learn about the Effects of Food Stamps on Obesity in the Presence of Misreporting?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(4), pages 997-1017.
    8. Didier Nibbering & Matthijs Oosterveen, 2023. "Instrument-based estimation of full treatment effects with movers," Papers 2306.07018, arXiv.org.
    9. Seoyun Hong & Chang Sik Kim & Hyunchul Kim, 2022. "Measuring the Effects of Bid-Rigging on Prices with Binary Misclassification," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 61(3), pages 319-339, November.
    10. Acerenza, Santiago & Ban, Kyunghoon & Kedagni, Desire, 2021. "Marginal Treatment Effects with Misclassified Treatment," ISU General Staff Papers 202106180700001132, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Akanksha Negi & Digvijay Singh Negi, 2022. "Difference-in-Differences with a Misclassified Treatment," Papers 2208.02412, arXiv.org.
    12. Battistin, Erich & Ovidi, Marco, 2017. "Rising Stars," IZA Discussion Papers 11198, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Vishwajeet Singh & Alok Kumar Dwivedi & Sada Nand Dwivedi & SVS Deo, 2018. "Comparative Appraisal of Estimated Odds Ratio and Risk Ratio Using Binary Regression Models Analysis of Nodal Involvement Among Oral-Cancer Patients," Biostatistics and Biometrics Open Access Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 8(4), pages 84-90, November.
    14. Akanksha Negi & Digvijay S. Negi, 2024. "Difference-in-Differences with a Misclassified Treatment," Working Papers 121, Ashoka University, Department of Economics.
    15. Rud, Iryna & Van Klaveren, Chris & Groot, Wim & Maassen van den Brink, Henriëtte, 2014. "The externalities of crime: The effect of criminal involvement of parents on the educational attainment of their children," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 89-103.
    16. Akanksha Negi & Digvijay S. Negi, 2025. "Difference‐in‐Differences With a Misclassified Treatment," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(4), pages 411-423, June.
    17. Tommasi, Denni & Zhang, Lina, 2024. "Bounding program benefits when participation is misreported," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 238(1).
    18. Elsayed, Mahmoud A.A., 2016. "The Impact of Education Tax Benefits on College Completion," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 16-30.
    19. Lina Zhang, 2020. "Spillovers of Program Benefits with Missing Network Links," Papers 2009.09614, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    20. Denni Tommasi & Lina Zhang, 2024. "Identifying program benefits when participation is misreported," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(6), pages 1123-1148, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:8:y:2025:i:3:p:83-:d:1752494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.