IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adp/jbboaj/v8y2018i4p84-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Appraisal of Estimated Odds Ratio and Risk Ratio Using Binary Regression Models Analysis of Nodal Involvement Among Oral-Cancer Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Vishwajeet Singh

    (Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India)

  • Alok Kumar Dwivedi

    (Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India)

  • Sada Nand Dwivedi

    (Division of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, USA)

  • SVS Deo

    (Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India)

Abstract

Predictive modeling for binary outcome in the form of logistic regression is very common in medical area. However, there is a substantial debate on the estimate of most appropriate association measures while analyzing binary outcomes. Odds ratio (OR) needs to be used in the case of case-control study only whereas prevalence ratio (PR) which is equivalent to relative risk (RR) should be appropriately used in the case of cross-sectional studies. Recently, Dwivedi et al. [1] proposed a modification in Diaz-Quijano method (BRR) to estimate RR along with appropriate 95% CI directly from logistic regression for a prevalent binary outcome.

Suggested Citation

  • Vishwajeet Singh & Alok Kumar Dwivedi & Sada Nand Dwivedi & SVS Deo, 2018. "Comparative Appraisal of Estimated Odds Ratio and Risk Ratio Using Binary Regression Models Analysis of Nodal Involvement Among Oral-Cancer Patients," Biostatistics and Biometrics Open Access Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 8(4), pages 84-90, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:adp:jbboaj:v:8:y:2018:i:4:p:84-90
    DOI: 10.19080/BBOAJ.2018.08.555745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/bboaj/pdf/BBOAJ.MS.ID.555745.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/bboaj/BBOAJ.MS.ID.555745.php
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.19080/BBOAJ.2018.08.555745?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alok Kumar Dwivedi & Indika Mallawaarachchi & Soyoung Lee & Patrick Tarwater, 2014. "Methods for estimating relative risk in studies of common binary outcomes," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 484-500, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adp:jbboaj:v:8:y:2018:i:4:p:84-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Thomas (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.