IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v5y2015i4p760-777d58972.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aging and Resilience: Older Women’s Responses to Change and Adversity

Author

Listed:
  • Cari L. Gulbrandsen

    (Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Christine Walsh

    (Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

Abstract

The primary objective of the qualitative study was to describe women’s resilience in older adulthood according to older women’s interpretations of their experiences and the contexts of their lives. Intersectionality and critical feminist gerontology served as theoretical frameworks for examining, interpreting and highlighted the dynamic nature of intersecting identities and the interrelationships between identity and contextual factors. Constructivist grounded theory methodology was used to identify themes that represent older women’s subjective interpretations of their experiences with adversity and to construct definitions of resilience based on their experiences. The aspects of identity that women in the study associated with their experiences of adversity and their resilience were age, physical and mental health, marital status and income. Women in the study emphasized how subjective interpretations influenced the meaning they associated with events, circumstances, or changes that accompanied aging and their understanding of the role of identities in those experiences.

Suggested Citation

  • Cari L. Gulbrandsen & Christine Walsh, 2015. "Aging and Resilience: Older Women’s Responses to Change and Adversity," Societies, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:5:y:2015:i:4:p:760-777:d:58972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/5/4/760/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/5/4/760/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin Cornwell, 2011. "Independence Through Social Networks: Bridging Potential Among Older Women and Men," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 66(6), pages 782-794.
    2. Tiina-Mari Lyyra & Riitta-Liisa Heikkinen, 2006. "Perceived Social Support and Mortality in Older People," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 61(3), pages 147-152.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nakagomi, Atsushi & Tsuji, Taishi & Saito, Masashige & Ide, Kazushige & Kondo, Katsunori & Shiba, Koichiro, 2023. "Social isolation and subsequent health and well-being in older adults: A longitudinal outcome-wide analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    2. Young Bum Kim & Seung Hee Lee, 2022. "Gender Differences in Correlates of Loneliness among Community-Dwelling Older Koreans," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-11, June.
    3. Feng, Zhixin & Jones, Kelvyn & Wang, Wenfei Winnie, 2015. "An exploratory discrete-time multilevel analysis of the effect of social support on the survival of elderly people in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 181-189.
    4. Zuojin Yu & Aurora B. Le & Alexa Doerr & Todd D. Smith, 2022. "Level of Concern, Spending, and External Support Related to COVID-19: A Comparison between Working and Non-Working Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-10, September.
    5. Yang, Yang Claire & Schorpp, Kristen & Harris, Kathleen Mullan, 2014. "Social support, social strain and inflammation: Evidence from a national longitudinal study of U.S. adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 124-135.
    6. Goldman, Alyssa W. & Cornwell, Benjamin, 2015. "Social network bridging potential and the use of complementary and alternative medicine in later life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 69-80.
    7. Yoon, Heesoo & Park, Gum-Ryeong & Kim, Jinho, 2022. "Psychosocial trajectories before and after spousal loss: Does gender matter?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    8. Shor, Eran & Roelfs, David J., 2015. "Social contact frequency and all-cause mortality: A meta-analysis and meta-regression," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 76-86.
    9. Milner, Allison & Krnjacki, Lauren & Butterworth, Peter & LaMontagne, Anthony D., 2016. "The role of social support in protecting mental health when employed and unemployed: A longitudinal fixed-effects analysis using 12 annual waves of the HILDA cohort," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 20-26.
    10. Aarón Salinas-Rodríguez & Karla Moreno-Tamayo & María Hernández-Serrato & María del Rocío Enríquez-Rosas & Betty Soledad Manrique-Espinoza, 2018. "Multidimensional social support is associated with healthcare utilization among older Mexican adults," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 77-85, March.
    11. Wang, Kun & Gu, Danan, 2023. "Reciprocal associations between social media use and self-perception of aging among older adults: Do men and women differ?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    12. Benjamin Cornwell, 2015. "Social Disadvantage and Network Turnover," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 70(1), pages 132-142.
    13. Hajime Iwasa & Hiroki Inagaki & Yukie Masui & Yasuyuki Gondo, 2022. "Relationship between Personality and Mortality among Japanese Older Adults: A 14-Year Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-8, February.
    14. Sofia Humboldt & Isabel Leal & Filipa Pimenta & João Maroco, 2014. "Assessing Adjustment to Aging: A Validation Study for the Adjustment to Aging Scale (AtAS)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 455-472, October.
    15. Markus H. Schafer & Jonathan Koltai, 2015. "Does Embeddedness Protect? Personal Network Density and Vulnerability to Mistreatment Among Older American Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 70(4), pages 597-606.
    16. Apostolos Papachristos & Georgia Verropoulou & George Ploubidis & Cleon Tsimbos, 2020. "Factors incorporated into future survival estimation among Europeans," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 42(2), pages 15-56.
    17. Nakagomi, Atsushi & Shiba, Koichiro & Hanazato, Masamichi & Kondo, Katsunori & Kawachi, Ichiro, 2020. "Does community-level social capital mitigate the impact of widowhood & living alone on depressive symptoms?: A prospective, multi-level study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    18. Torrejón, María-José & Martin-Matthews, Anne, 2022. "A qualitative approach to bridging and bonding social capital: Experiences of a cohort of Chilean older people," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    19. Emmanouil K Symvoulakis & Manolis Linardakis & Apostolos Kamekis & Myfanwy Morgan & Spyridon Klinis, 2022. "The Personal Sociability and Connections Scale (PeSCS): Development and initial assessment at a primary care facility," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 68(3), pages 639-648, May.
    20. Birditt, Kira & Antonucci, Toni C., 2008. "Life sustaining irritations? Relationship quality and mortality in the context of chronic illness," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1291-1299, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:5:y:2015:i:4:p:760-777:d:58972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.