IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v15y2025i4p95-d1627522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Social Sciences to Urban Praxis: A Critical Synthesis of Historical–Contextual Inquiry and Analysis in Urban Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Hisham Abusaada

    (Department of Architecture, Housing and Building National Research Center (HBRC), Cairo P.O. Box 1770, Egypt)

  • Abeer Elshater

    (Department of Urban Design and Planning, Ain Shams University, Cairo P.O. Box 11517, Egypt)

Abstract

This concept paper introduces the Contextual Critical Historical Inquiry and Analysis (CCHIA) framework—a critical synthesis tool designed to advance historical contextual inquiry in urban studies. The study aims to develop a structured methodological framework that integrates historical and critical approaches to enhance the analysis of urban phenomena. To develop this framework, we employed a two-fold strategy, conducting a literature search of the social sciences and urban studies using databases including Google Scholar, Web of Science, JSTOR, and Scopus. First, we screened Google Scholar to identify relevant scholars and works published between 1883 and 2024. Second, a content analysis of 58 peer-reviewed articles (2000–2024) was then performed. The concept paper follows a five-stage, 26-step framework integrating four history-focused concepts—interpretive history, historical perspective, historical context, and historical contextualization—alongside three critical approaches: critical discourse analysis, comparative historical analysis, and critical urban theory. By synthesizing these elements, the suggested framework equips researchers to systematically decode the historical and societal forces shaping urban phenomena. CCHIA challenges traditional urban scholarship by leveraging interdisciplinary insights from the social sciences, addressing context as a theoretical perspective for understanding urban formation, and as a critical influence on academic writing. The contribution of CCHIA lies in linking historical analysis to contemporary urban challenges—enabling researchers to focus on previous literature analysis findings to address the current situation’s challenges. The CCHIA framework offers an adaptable toolkit for producing socially engaged and context-sensitive urban textbooks.

Suggested Citation

  • Hisham Abusaada & Abeer Elshater, 2025. "From Social Sciences to Urban Praxis: A Critical Synthesis of Historical–Contextual Inquiry and Analysis in Urban Studies," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-31, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:95-:d:1627522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/4/95/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/4/95/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon F Parker, 2001. "Community, social identity and the structuration of power in the contemporary European city Part Two: Power and identity in the urban community: A comparative analysis," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 281-309.
    2. Neil Brenner, 2009. "What is critical urban theory?," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2-3), pages 198-207, June.
    3. Abeer Elshater & Hisham Abusaada, 2025. "Applying Contextualism: From Urban Formation to Textual Representation," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-38, March.
    4. Elin Torell, 2002. "From past to present: The historical context of environmental and coastal management in Tanzania," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 273-288.
    5. Richard Hu, 2013. "Urban Design Plans for Downtown San Francisco: A Paradigm Shift?," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 517-533, November.
    6. Gideon Baffoe & Shilpi Roy, 2023. "Colonial legacies and contemporary urban planning practices in Dhaka, Bangladesh," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 173-196, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caris, Ethan & Cao, Mengqiu, 2024. "Investigating contestation around neighbourhood scale active travel infrastructure policy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 95-107.
    2. Peter Marcuse, 2010. "In defense of theory in practice," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1-2), pages 4-12, February.
    3. Hugo Marcelo Zunino, 2006. "Power Relations in Urban Decision-making: Neo-liberalism, 'Techno-politicians' and Authoritarian Redevelopment in Santiago, Chile," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1825-1846, September.
    4. Carijn Beumer, 2017. "Sustopia or Cosmopolis? A Critical Reflection on the Sustainable City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Cardullo, Paolo, 2017. "Gentrification in the mesh? Ethnography of Open Wireless Network - Deptford," OSF Preprints jm68s, Center for Open Science.
    6. Chiara Certomà, 2020. "Digital Social Innovation and Urban Space: A Critical Geography Agenda," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 8-19.
    7. Oren Yiftachel, 2016. "The Aleph—Jerusalem as critical learning," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 483-494, June.
    8. Lindsay Blair Howe, 2021. "Thinking through people: The potential of volunteered geographic information for mobility and urban studies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(14), pages 3009-3028, November.
    9. Veikko Eranti & Taina Meriluoto, 2023. "PLURALITY IN URBAN POLITICS: Conflict and Commonality in Mouffe and Thévenot," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5), pages 693-709, September.
    10. James Rodriguez, 2024. "Carceral connections: The role of policing in the management of public housing in New York City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(3), pages 513-530, February.
    11. Mark Whitehead, 2013. "Neoliberal Urban Environmentalism and the Adaptive City: Towards a Critical Urban Theory and Climate Change," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(7), pages 1348-1367, May.
    12. Kurt Iveson, 2010. "Some critical reflections on being critical: Reading for deviance, dominance or difference?," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 434-441, August.
    13. Marianna d’Ovidio, 2021. "Ethics at work: Diverse economies and place-making in the historical centre of Taranto, Italy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(11), pages 2276-2292, August.
    14. Neil Brenner & Swarnabh Ghosh, 2022. "Between the colossal and the catastrophic: Planetary urbanization and the political ecologies of emergent infectious disease," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(5), pages 867-910, August.
    15. Olga V. Vorobeva & Ekaterina A. Manzhula, 2021. "Smartization in Gatchina: A Case of a Russian Town," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 10(4), pages 88-103, October.
    16. Boeing, Geoff, 2017. "Methods and Measures for Analyzing Complex Street Networks and Urban Form," SocArXiv 93h82, Center for Open Science.
    17. Carlo Fabian & Sandra Janett & Tobias Bischoff & Riccardo Pardini & Johanna Leitner & Carlo Knöpfel, 2019. "The Development of ‘Age Appropriate’ Living Environments: Analysis of Two Case Studies from a Social Work Perspective," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(2), pages 123-133.
    18. Kębłowski, Wojciech & Dobruszkes, Frédéric & Boussauw, Kobe, 2022. "Moving past sustainable transport studies: Towards a critical perspective on urban transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 74-83.
    19. Chiara Certomà, 2020. "Digital Social Innovation and Urban Space: A Critical Geography Agenda," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 8-19.
    20. Natalya KOSTKO & Mariya BATYREVA & Irina PECHERKINA & Oksana LAZAREVA, 2021. "Are Smart Technologies An Instrument Of Active City Dwellers?," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(3), pages 73-91, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:95-:d:1627522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.