IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v9y2020i4p47-d343541.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Social Networks Make Us More Sensitive to Social Discrimination? E-Contact, Identity Processes and Perception of Online Sexual Discrimination in a Sample of Facebook Users

Author

Listed:
  • Tiziana Mancini

    (Department of Humanities, Social Sciences and Cultural Industries, University of Parma, 43121 Parma, Italy)

  • Chiara Imperato

    (Department of Humanities, Social Sciences and Cultural Industries, University of Parma, 43121 Parma, Italy)

Abstract

In recent years psychosocial studies have given a growing attention to online intergroup contact in reducing prejudice. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of evidence on processes that could mediate this relation. The present study aimed to fill this gap. Focused on intergroup relationships between people with different sexual orientations, it examined whether and to what extent identity processes—i.e., sexual identity commitment and exploration—mediated the relationship between online intergroup contact and perception of mediated and vicarious sexual online discrimination on Facebook. Data was collected with a sample of 357 Facebook users ( M age = 26.07, SD = 8.37; females: 64.9%, males: 35.1%) who completed an online questionnaire. A full Structural Equation Modeling was tested. Results showed that: (a) Online contact was positively associated with perceived online sexual discrimination; (b) online contact was positively associated with identity exploration but not commitment; (c) exploration—but not commitment—was positively associated with perceived online sexual discrimination; (d) sexual identity exploration—but not commitment—mediated the relationship between online contact and perception of sexual discrimination, increasing the positive effect of contact on perceived discrimination. Limitations and directions for future research were discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiziana Mancini & Chiara Imperato, 2020. "Can Social Networks Make Us More Sensitive to Social Discrimination? E-Contact, Identity Processes and Perception of Online Sexual Discrimination in a Sample of Facebook Users," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-11, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:4:p:47-:d:343541
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/4/47/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/4/47/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joshua A Tabak & Vivian Zayas, 2012. "The Roles of Featural and Configural Face Processing in Snap Judgments of Sexual Orientation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-7, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chiara Imperato & Tiziana Mancini, 2021. "Intergroup Dialogues in the Landscape of Digital Societies: How Does the Dialogical Self Affect Intercultural Relations in Online Contexts?," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Chiara Imperato & Brian T. Keum & Tiziana Mancini, 2021. "Does Intercultural Contact Increase Anti-Racist Behavior on Social Network Sites?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosenbaum, Mark S. & Russell, Eric M. & Russell-Bennett, Rebekah, 2017. "“I’ll wait for him†: Understanding when female shoppers prefer working with gay male sales associates," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 172-179.
    2. Rosenbaum, Mark S. & Russell-Bennett, Rebekah & Drennan, Judy, 2015. "Commercial friendships between gay sales associates and straight female customers in luxury settings: A proposed theoretical framework," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 179-186.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:4:p:47-:d:343541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.