IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v9y2020i12p231-d462343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exceptional Injustice: Facebook as a Reflection of Race- and Gender-Based Narratives Following the Death of George Floyd

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia J Dixon

    (Department of Sociology, McDaniel College, 2 College Hill, Westminster, MD 21157, USA)

  • Lauren Dundes

    (Department of Sociology, McDaniel College, 2 College Hill, Westminster, MD 21157, USA)

Abstract

Following the death of George Floyd, Facebook posts about the Black Lives Matter movement (BLM) surged, creating the opportunity to examine reactions by race and sex. This study employed a two-part mixed methods approach beginning with an analysis of posts from a single college student’s Facebook newsfeed over a 12-week period, commencing on the date of George Floyd’s death (25 May 2020). A triangulation protocol enhanced exploratory observational–archival Facebook posts with qualitative data from 24 Black and White college students queried about their views of BLM and policing. The Facebook data revealed that White males, who were the least active in posting about BLM, were most likely to criticize BLM protests. They also believed incidents of police brutality were exceptions that tainted an otherwise commendable profession. In contrast, Black individuals commonly saw the case of George Floyd as consistent with a longstanding pattern of injustice that takes an emotional toll, and as an egregious exemplification of racism that calls for indictment of the status quo. The exploratory data in this article also illustrate how even for a cause célèbre, attention on Facebook ebbs over time. This phenomenon obscures the urgency of effecting change, especially for persons whose understanding of racism is influenced by its coverage on social media. The need to recognize the divergence of views—how they vary by sex and race and their connection to social media—remains critical for progress in determining the best steps forward in race relations and police reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia J Dixon & Lauren Dundes, 2020. "Exceptional Injustice: Facebook as a Reflection of Race- and Gender-Based Narratives Following the Death of George Floyd," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-24, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:12:p:231-:d:462343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/12/231/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/12/231/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miethe, Terance D. & Venger, Olesya & Lieberman, Joel D., 2019. "Police use of force and its video coverage: An experimental study of the impact of media source and content on public perceptions," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 35-46.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Inês Casquilho-Martins & Helena Belchior-Rocha & David Ramalho Alves, 2022. "Racial and Ethnic Discrimination in Portugal in Times of Pandemic Crisis," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yasir Aleem & Sanan Waheed Khan & Saima Jamroze, 2021. "Media'S Portrayal Of Crime And Public Perception Toward The Criminal Justice System," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 10(4), pages 167-175, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:12:p:231-:d:462343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.