IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v14y2025i3p172-d1611681.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discriminated and Violent? The Social Representations of Minorities in the Rise of Radical Right Populist Parties in Portugal and Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Sofia Rebelo

    (Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra, 3000-115 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Manuel João Cruz

    (Centre for Social Studies, University of Coimbra, 3000-995 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Cristiano Gianolla

    (Centre for Social Studies, University of Coimbra, 3000-995 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Luciana Sotero

    (Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra, 3000-115 Coimbra, Portugal
    Centre for Social Studies, University of Coimbra, 3000-995 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Lisete Mónico

    (Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra, 3000-115 Coimbra, Portugal
    Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive Behavioral Intervention, University of Coimbra, 3000-115 Coimbra, Portugal)

Abstract

The rise of radical right-wing parties in Europe brings new dynamics and challenges to western liberal democratic models, particularly in how these parties construct narratives around minorities, often framing them as threats to national identity and security. Given the historical background of populist governments in Italy and Portugal being, until recently, an exception in the context of populism in Europe, the comparison between these two countries offers an opportunity to analyse the dynamics and impacts of radical right-wing populism in both countries. The present research aims to address the scarcity of studies on social representations of minorities in Portugal and Italy. To achieve this goal, we conducted a survey ( N = 1796) in Portugal and Italy. Using the free word association technique, based on Abric’s Structural Approach to Social Representations Theory, we analyse responses regarding social representations of minorities. Our findings reveal that, while respondents in both nations acknowledge discrimination, the Italian sample includes a wider range of negative terms, such as “violent”—whereas the Portuguese sample largely portrays minorities in positive terms, favouring their inclusion. Respondents in both countries recognise the existence of discrimination against minorities in society, yet the evocation of terms such as “violent”, “profiteers”, and “repugnant” reflects considerable influence from exclusionary and marginalising narratives.

Suggested Citation

  • Sofia Rebelo & Manuel João Cruz & Cristiano Gianolla & Luciana Sotero & Lisete Mónico, 2025. "Discriminated and Violent? The Social Representations of Minorities in the Rise of Radical Right Populist Parties in Portugal and Italy," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:172-:d:1611681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/3/172/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/3/172/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margaret Canovan, 1999. "Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 47(1), pages 2-16, March.
    2. José Santana-Pereira & João Cancela, 2020. "Demand without Supply? Populist Attitudes and Voting Behaviour in Post-Bailout Portugal," South European Society and Politics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 205-228, April.
    3. Koen Abts & Stefan Rummens, 2007. "Populism versus Democracy," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55, pages 405-424, June.
    4. Koen Abts & Stefan Rummens, 2007. "Populism versus Democracy," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(2), pages 405-424, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reinhard Heinisch & Oscar Gracia & Andrés Laguna-Tapia & Claudia Muriel, 2024. "Libertarian Populism? Making Sense of Javier Milei’s Political Discourse," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-27, November.
    2. Kim, Seongcheol, 2022. "Von Lefort zu Mouffe. Populismus als Moment und Grenze radikaler Demokratie [From Lefort to Mouffe: Populism as moment and limit of radical democracy]," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 767-786.
    3. Reinhard Heinisch & Carsten Wegscheider, 2020. "Disentangling How Populism and Radical Host Ideologies Shape Citizens’ Conceptions of Democratic Decision-Making," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 32-44.
    4. Reinhard Heinisch & Carsten Wegscheider, 2020. "Disentangling How Populism and Radical Host Ideologies Shape Citizens’ Conceptions of Democratic Decision-Making," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 32-44.
    5. Krause, Werner & Wagner, Aiko, 2021. "Becoming part of the gang? Established and nonestablished populist parties and the role of external efficacy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 27(1), pages 161-173.
    6. Krause, Werner & Spittler, Marcus & Wagner, Aiko, 2017. "Attraktion und Repulsion. AnhängerInnen rechts- und linkspopulistischer Parteien im europäischen Vergleich," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 45(Sonderban), pages 106-137.
    7. Carlos de las Heras-Pedrosa & Carmen Jambrino-Maldonado & Patricia P. Iglesias-Sánchez & Elena Millán-Celis, 2020. "Populism and Independence Movements in Europe: The Catalan-Spanish Case," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Emiliana De Blasio & Michele Sorice, 2018. "Populism between direct democracy and the technological myth," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Krause, Werner & Giebler, Heiko, 2020. "Shifting Welfare Policy Positions: The Impact of Radical Right Populist Party Success Beyond Migration Politics," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 56(3), pages 331-348.
    10. Antonino Castaldo & Luca Verzichelli, 2020. "Technocratic Populism in Italy after Berlusconi: The Trendsetter and his Disciples," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 485-495.
    11. Nicolás Cachanosky & Alexandre Padilla, 2020. "A panel data analysis of Latin American populism," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 329-343, September.
    12. Laura Cervi & Santiago Tejedor, 2020. "Framing “The Gypsy Problem”: Populist Electoral Use of Romaphobia in Italy (2014–2019)," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Merve Genç, 2023. "#NotDying4Wallstreet: A Discourse Analysis on Health vs. Economy during COVID-19," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    14. Ming-Lun Chung & Eric M. P. Chiu & Yu Hang KWOK & Ka-wo Fung, 2025. "To bond or bridge: how do populist attitudes intensify the effect of online social capital on political engagement?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Manuel Hensmans, 2021. "Exploring the dark and bright sides of Internet democracy: Ethos-reversing and ethos-renewing digital transformation," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/321232, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    16. Stefan Rummens & Koen Abts, 2010. "Defending Democracy: The Concentric Containment of Political Extremism," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(4), pages 649-665, October.
    17. Antonino Castaldo & Luca Verzichelli, 2020. "Technocratic Populism in Italy after Berlusconi: The Trendsetter and his Disciples," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 485-495.
    18. Nicolás Cachanosky & Edward J. Lopez, 2020. "Rediscovering Buchanan’s rediscovery: non-market exchange versus antiseptic allocation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 183(3), pages 461-477, June.
    19. Matthijs Rooduijn & Wouter van der Brug & Sarah L. de Lange & Jante Parlevliet, 2017. "Persuasive Populism? Estimating the Effect of Populist Messages on Political Cynicism," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 136-145.
    20. Federico Favaretto & Michele Mariani, 2024. "EDMocracy: populism and democratic dissatisfaction in Europe," BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers 24219, BAFFI CAREFIN, Centre for Applied Research on International Markets Banking Finance and Regulation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:172-:d:1611681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.