IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v11y2022i5p190-d802474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Introduction of the Special Issue: Asian Perspectives on Active Aging: Meaning, Purpose and Hope

Author

Listed:
  • Kalyani K. Mehta

    (Gerontology and Social Work, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore 599494, Singapore)

  • Leng Leng Thang

    (Department of Japanese Studies, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260, Singapore)

Abstract

This Special Issue focuses on the value of active ageing and its beneficial impact on mental and physical health [...]

Suggested Citation

  • Kalyani K. Mehta & Leng Leng Thang, 2022. "The Introduction of the Special Issue: Asian Perspectives on Active Aging: Meaning, Purpose and Hope," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-3, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:5:p:190-:d:802474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/5/190/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/5/190/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aris Ananta & Ahmad Irsan A. Moeis & Hendro Try Widianto & Heri Yulianto & Evi Nurvidya Arifin, 2021. "Pension and Active Ageing: Lessons Learned from Civil Servants in Indonesia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Yoshiko Someya & Cullen T. Hayashida, 2022. "The Past, Present and Future Direction of Government-Supported Active Aging Initiatives in Japan: A Work in Progress," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evi Satispi & Ismi Rajiani & Mamun Murod & Andriansyah Andriansyah, 2023. "Human Resources Information System (HRIS) to Enhance Civil Servants’ Innovation Outcomes: Compulsory or Complimentary?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    n/a;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:5:p:190-:d:802474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.