IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v10y2021i8p286-d602582.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Value of Critical Thinking in Higher Education and the Labour Market: The Voice of Stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • Valdonė Indrašienė

    (Institute of Educational Sciences and Social Work, Faculty of Human and Social Studies, Mykolas Romeris University, Ateities st. 20, LT-08303 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Violeta Jegelevičienė

    (Institute of Educational Sciences and Social Work, Faculty of Human and Social Studies, Mykolas Romeris University, Ateities st. 20, LT-08303 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Odeta Merfeldaitė

    (Institute of Educational Sciences and Social Work, Faculty of Human and Social Studies, Mykolas Romeris University, Ateities st. 20, LT-08303 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Daiva Penkauskienė

    (Institute of Educational Sciences and Social Work, Faculty of Human and Social Studies, Mykolas Romeris University, Ateities st. 20, LT-08303 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Jolanta Pivorienė

    (Institute of Educational Sciences and Social Work, Faculty of Human and Social Studies, Mykolas Romeris University, Ateities st. 20, LT-08303 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Asta Railienė

    (Institute of Educational Sciences and Social Work, Faculty of Human and Social Studies, Mykolas Romeris University, Ateities st. 20, LT-08303 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Justinas Sadauskas

    (Institute of Educational Sciences and Social Work, Faculty of Human and Social Studies, Mykolas Romeris University, Ateities st. 20, LT-08303 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Natalija Valavičienė

    (Institute of Educational Sciences and Social Work, Faculty of Human and Social Studies, Mykolas Romeris University, Ateities st. 20, LT-08303 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Critical thinking has been more than just a part of academic rhetoric and educational practice for some time now. In the rapidly changing world of information flow, critical thinking is often identified as the goal of higher education, and in the modern labour market, the importance of critical thinking to an organisation’s success is emphasised. Critical thinking is recognised as one of the tools for the formation and development of human and social capital. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence about the manifestation in the labour market of the critical thinking developed at institutions of higher education. This article seeks to reveal the attitude toward the importance of critical thinking in the modern labour market and toward the responsibility for developing it from the perspective of different stakeholder groups (lecturers, students, employers and employees) (the case of Lithuania). Quantitative research methodology was chosen, using a questionnaire for data collection. It was found that in both higher education and the labour market, critical thinking is treated as a developed and dynamic competence that encompasses both cognitive skills and dispositions. All of the stakeholder groups consider inference and argumentation to be the most important critical thinking skills in the modern labour market. Critical thinking dispositions such as self-confidence and fairness are the most valued. All of the stakeholder groups delegate responsibility for the development of critical thinking to the individual. In evaluating critical thinking, no divide was established between the higher education and labour market segments. The most differences in attitudes emerged in evaluating the assumption of responsibility for the development of critical thinking.

Suggested Citation

  • Valdonė Indrašienė & Violeta Jegelevičienė & Odeta Merfeldaitė & Daiva Penkauskienė & Jolanta Pivorienė & Asta Railienė & Justinas Sadauskas & Natalija Valavičienė, 2021. "The Value of Critical Thinking in Higher Education and the Labour Market: The Voice of Stakeholders," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:8:p:286-:d:602582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/8/286/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/10/8/286/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonas Christensen & Nils Ekelund & Margareta Melin & Pär Widén, 2021. "The Beautiful Risk of Collaborative and Interdisciplinary Research. A Challenging Collaborative and Critical Approach toward Sustainable Learning Processes in Academic Profession," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Aleksandra Krstikj, 2021. "Social Innovation in the Undergraduate Architecture Studio," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ben Purvis & Hannah Keding & Ashley Lewis & Phil Northall, 2023. "Critical reflections of postgraduate researchers on a collaborative interdisciplinary research project," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Graciano Dieck-Assad & Alfonso Ávila-Ortega & Omar Israel González Peña, 2021. "Comparing Competency Assessment in Electronics Engineering Education with and without Industry Training Partner by Challenge-Based Learning Oriented to Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-28, September.
    3. Denyse, Tammie & Martin, Kimberly J. & Stanton, Annette L., 2022. "The Ubuntu Approach in Project SOAR (Speaking Our African American Realities): Building a robust community-academic partnership and culturally curated focus groups," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    4. Cheryl Mallen & Greg Dingle, 2021. "Organizing Sport for Climate Related Adaptations: Lessons from the Water and Forestry Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-14, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:10:y:2021:i:8:p:286-:d:602582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.