IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v9y2021i12p216-d693148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantum Support Vector Regression for Disability Insurance

Author

Listed:
  • Boualem Djehiche

    (Department of Mathematics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Lindstedtsvägen 25, 114 28 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Björn Löfdahl

    (Department of Mathematics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Lindstedtsvägen 25, 114 28 Stockholm, Sweden)

Abstract

We propose a hybrid classical-quantum approach for modeling transition probabilities in health and disability insurance. The modeling of logistic disability inception probabilities is formulated as a support vector regression problem. Using a quantum feature map, the data are mapped to quantum states belonging to a quantum feature space, where the associated kernel is determined by the inner product between the quantum states. This quantum kernel can be efficiently estimated on a quantum computer. We conduct experiments on the IBM Yorktown quantum computer, fitting the model to disability inception data from a Swedish insurance company.

Suggested Citation

  • Boualem Djehiche & Björn Löfdahl, 2021. "Quantum Support Vector Regression for Disability Insurance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:12:p:216-:d:693148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/12/216/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/12/216/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Schuld, 2019. "Machine learning in quantum spaces," Nature, Nature, vol. 567(7747), pages 179-181, March.
    2. Christiansen, Marcus C. & Denuit, Michel & Lazar, Dorina, 2012. "The Solvency II square-root formula for systematic biometric risk," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2012002, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    3. Christiansen, Marcus C. & Denuit, Michel M. & Lazar, Dorina, 2012. "The Solvency II square-root formula for systematic biometric risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 257-265.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Djehiche, Boualem & Löfdahl, Björn, 2014. "Risk aggregation and stochastic claims reserving in disability insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 100-108.
    2. Eling, Martin & Pankoke, David, 2013. "Basis Risk, Procylicality, and Systemic Risk in the Solvency II Equity Risk Module," Working Papers on Finance 1306, University of St. Gallen, School of Finance.
    3. Christiansen, Marcus C. & Niemeyer, Andreas & Teigiszerová, Lucia, 2015. "Modeling and forecasting duration-dependent mortality rates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 65-81.
    4. Eling, Martin & Jung, Kwangmin, 2020. "Risk aggregation in non-life insurance: Standard models vs. internal models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 183-198.
    5. Paulusch, Joachim & Schlütter, Sebastian, 2022. "Sensitivity-implied tail-correlation matrices," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    6. Mezőfi, Balázs & Niedermayer, Andras & Niedermayer, Daniel & Süli, Balázs Márton, 2017. "Solvency II reporting: How to interpret funds’ aggregate solvency capital requirement figures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 164-171.
    7. Gatzert, Nadine & Martin, Michael, 2012. "Quantifying credit and market risk under Solvency II: Standard approach versus internal model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 649-666.
    8. Andreas Niemeyer, 2015. "Safety Margins for Systematic Biometric and Financial Risk in a Semi-Markov Life Insurance Framework," Risks, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-26, January.
    9. Marcus Christiansen, 2012. "Multistate models in health insurance," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 96(2), pages 155-186, June.
    10. Michael Heinrich & Thomas Schreck, 2017. "Effects of Solvency II on Portfolio Efficiency, The Case of Real Estate and Infrastructure Investments," LARES lares_2017_paper_8, Latin American Real Estate Society (LARES).
    11. Jonas Jäger & Roman V. Krems, 2023. "Universal expressiveness of variational quantum classifiers and quantum kernels for support vector machines," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-7, December.
    12. Olawale Ayoade & Pablo Rivas & Javier Orduz, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence Computing at the Quantum Level," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Wei-Ming Li & Shi-Ju Ran, 2022. "Non-Parametric Semi-Supervised Learning in Many-Body Hilbert Space with Rescaled Logarithmic Fidelity," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, March.
    14. Johannes Herrmann & Sergi Masot Llima & Ants Remm & Petr Zapletal & Nathan A. McMahon & Colin Scarato & François Swiadek & Christian Kraglund Andersen & Christoph Hellings & Sebastian Krinner & Nathan, 2022. "Realizing quantum convolutional neural networks on a superconducting quantum processor to recognize quantum phases," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-7, December.
    15. Domenico Pomarico & Annarita Fanizzi & Nicola Amoroso & Roberto Bellotti & Albino Biafora & Samantha Bove & Vittorio Didonna & Daniele La Forgia & Maria Irene Pastena & Pasquale Tamborra & Alfredo Zit, 2021. "A Proposal of Quantum-Inspired Machine Learning for Medical Purposes: An Application Case," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, February.
    16. Ajagekar, Akshay & You, Fengqi, 2022. "Quantum computing and quantum artificial intelligence for renewable and sustainable energy: A emerging prospect towards climate neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    17. Daniel J. Egger & Claudio Gambella & Jakub Marecek & Scott McFaddin & Martin Mevissen & Rudy Raymond & Andrea Simonetto & Stefan Woerner & Elena Yndurain, 2020. "Quantum Computing for Finance: State of the Art and Future Prospects," Papers 2006.14510, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2021.
    18. Sofiene Jerbi & Lukas J. Fiderer & Hendrik Poulsen Nautrup & Jonas M. Kübler & Hans J. Briegel & Vedran Dunjko, 2023. "Quantum machine learning beyond kernel methods," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-8, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:12:p:216-:d:693148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.