IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v7y2019i2p68-d240529.html

Ruin Probability Functions and Severity of Ruin as a Statistical Decision Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Emilio Gómez-Déniz

    (Department of Quantitative Methods and Institute of Tourism and Sustainable Economic Development (TIDES), University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, E-35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain)

  • José María Sarabia

    (Department of Economics, University of Cantabria, E-39005 Santander, Spain)

  • Enrique Calderín-Ojeda

    (Centre for Actuarial Studies, Department of Economics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia)

Abstract

It is known that the classical ruin function under exponential claim-size distribution depends on two parameters, which are referred to as the mean claim size and the relative security loading. These parameters are assumed to be unknown and random, thus, a loss function that measures the loss sustained by a decision-maker who takes as valid a ruin function which is not correct can be considered. By using squared-error loss function and appropriate distribution function for these parameters, the issue of estimating the ruin function derives in a mixture procedure. Firstly, a bivariate distribution for mixing jointly the two parameters is considered, and second, different univariate distributions for mixing both parameters separately are examined. Consequently, a catalogue of ruin probability functions and severity of ruin, which are more flexible than the original one, are obtained. The methodology is also extended to the Pareto claim size distribution. Several numerical examples illustrate the performance of these functions.

Suggested Citation

  • Emilio Gómez-Déniz & José María Sarabia & Enrique Calderín-Ojeda, 2019. "Ruin Probability Functions and Severity of Ruin as a Statistical Decision Problem," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:68-:d:240529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/7/2/68/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/7/2/68/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Albrecher, Hansjörg & Constantinescu, Corina & Loisel, Stephane, 2011. "Explicit ruin formulas for models with dependence among risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 265-270, March.
    2. Ramsay, Colin M., 2003. "A solution to the ruin problem for Pareto distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 109-116, August.
    3. Sarabia, José María & Gómez-Déniz, Emilio & Prieto, Faustino & Jordá, Vanesa, 2018. "Aggregation Of Dependent Risks In Mixtures Of Exponential Distributions And Extensions," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(3), pages 1079-1107, September.
    4. Colin M. Ramsay & Miguel Arturo Usábel Rodrigo, 1997. "Calculating ruin probabilities via product integration," Documentos de trabajo de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales 97-15, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales.
    5. Gordy, Michael B, 1998. "Computationally Convenient Distributional Assumptions for Common-Value Auctions," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 61-78, August.
    6. repec:cup:astinb:v:17:y:1987:i:02:p:151-163_00 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Dickson,David C. M., 2005. "Insurance Risk and Ruin," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521846400.
    8. Ramsay, Colin M. & Usabel, Miguel A., 1997. "Calculating Ruin Probabilities via Product Integration," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(2), pages 263-271, November.
    9. Heilmann, Wolf-Rudiger, 1989. "Decision theoretic foundations of credibility theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 77-95, March.
    10. Schmidli, Hanspeter, 1999. "On the Distribution of the Surplus Prior and at Ruin," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(2), pages 227-244, November.
    11. Garcia, Jorge M.A., 2005. "Explicit Solutions for Survival Probabilities in the Classical Risk Model," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 113-130, May.
    12. Tamturk, Muhsin & Utev, Sergey, 2018. "Ruin probability via Quantum Mechanics Approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 69-74.
    13. Ghitany, M.E. & Atieh, B. & Nadarajah, S., 2008. "Lindley distribution and its application," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 78(4), pages 493-506.
    14. repec:cup:astinb:v:22:y:1992:i:02:p:177-190_00 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. repec:cup:astinb:v:11:y:1980:i:01:p:61-71_00 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Kazutoshi Yamazaki, 2017. "Phase-type Approximation of the Gerber-Shiu Function," Papers 1701.02798, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olena Ragulina & Jonas Šiaulys, 2020. "Upper Bounds and Explicit Formulas for the Ruin Probability in the Risk Model with Stochastic Premiums and a Multi-Layer Dividend Strategy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-35, October.
    2. Emilio Gómez-Déniz & Jorge V. Pérez-Rodríguez & Simón Sosvilla-Rivero, 2022. "Analyzing How the Social Security Reserve Fund in Spain Affects the Sustainability of the Pension System," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gómez-Déniz, Emilio & Sordo, Miguel A. & Calderín-Ojeda, Enrique, 2014. "The Log–Lindley distribution as an alternative to the beta regression model with applications in insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 49-57.
    2. Emilio Gómez-Déniz & Jorge V. Pérez-Rodríguez & Simón Sosvilla-Rivero, 2022. "Analyzing How the Social Security Reserve Fund in Spain Affects the Sustainability of the Pension System," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Furman, Edward & Kye, Yisub & Su, Jianxi, 2021. "Multiplicative background risk models: Setting a course for the idiosyncratic risk factors distributed phase-type," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 153-167.
    4. Fouad Marri & Khouzeima Moutanabbir, 2021. "Risk aggregation and capital allocation using a new generalized Archimedean copula," Papers 2103.10989, arXiv.org.
    5. Psarrakos, Georgios & Vliora, Polyxeni, 2024. "On the flexibility and loading maximization for weighted premiums," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 481(C).
    6. Muhsin Tamturk & Dominic Cortis & Mark Farrell, 2020. "Examining the Effects of Gradual Catastrophes on Capital Modelling and the Solvency of Insurers: The Case of COVID-19," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Fouad Marri & Khouzeima Moutanabbir, 2021. "Risk aggregation and capital allocation using a new generalized Archimedean copula," Working Papers hal-03169291, HAL.
    8. Woo, Jae-Kyung, 2011. "Refinements of two-sided bounds for renewal equations," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 189-196, March.
    9. Castañer, A. & Claramunt, M.M. & Lefèvre, C. & Loisel, S., 2015. "Discrete Schur-constant models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 343-362.
    10. Franck Adékambi & Kokou Essiomle, 2020. "Ruin Probability for Stochastic Flows of Financial Contract under Phase-Type Distribution," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Martire, Antonio Luciano, 2022. "Volterra integral equations: An approach based on Lipschitz-continuity," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 435(C).
    12. Maha A. Omair & Yusra A. Tashkandy & Sameh Askar & Abdulhamid A. Alzaid, 2022. "Family of Distributions Derived from Whittaker Function," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-23, March.
    13. Jaap Spreeuw, 2022. "The Copula Derived from the SAHARA Utility Function," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-10, June.
    14. Danijel Grahovac, 2018. "Densities of Ruin-Related Quantities in the Cramér-Lundberg Model with Pareto Claims," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 273-288, March.
    15. Yue He & Reiichiro Kawai & Yasutaka Shimizu & Kazutoshi Yamazaki, 2022. "The Gerber-Shiu discounted penalty function: A review from practical perspectives," Papers 2203.10680, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    16. Castañer, A. & Claramunt, M.M. & Lefèvre, C. & Loisel, S., 2015. "Discrete Schur-constant models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 343-362.
    17. Olena Ragulina & Jonas Šiaulys, 2020. "Upper Bounds and Explicit Formulas for the Ruin Probability in the Risk Model with Stochastic Premiums and a Multi-Layer Dividend Strategy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-35, October.
    18. Vadim Semenikhine & Edward Furman & Jianxi Su, 2018. "On a Multiplicative Multivariate Gamma Distribution with Applications in Insurance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-20, August.
    19. Marri, Fouad & Moutanabbir, Khouzeima, 2022. "Risk aggregation and capital allocation using a new generalized Archimedean copula," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 75-90.
    20. Gómez–Déniz, E. & Pérez–Rodríguez, J.V., 2019. "Modelling distribution of aggregate expenditure on tourism," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 293-308.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:68-:d:240529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.