IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v13y2025i7p132-d1696457.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Mack Chain Ladder and Data Granularity for Preserved Development Periods

Author

Listed:
  • Greg Taylor

    (School of Risk and Actuarial Studies, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW 2052, Australia)

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the choice of data granularity for the application of the Mack chain ladder model to forecast a loss reserve. It is a sequel to a related paper by Taylor, which considers the same question for the EDF chain ladder model. As in the earlier paper, it considers the question as to whether a decrease in the time unit leads to an increase or decrease in the variance of the loss reserve estimate. The question of whether a Mack chain ladder that is valid for one time unit (here called mesh size) remains so for another is investigated. The conditions under which the model does remain valid are established. There are various ways in which the mesh size of a data triangle may be varied, two of them of particular interest. The paper examines one of these, namely that in which development periods are preserved. Two versions of this are investigated: 1. the aggregation of development periods without change to accident periods; 2. the aggregation of accident periods without change to development periods. Taylor found that, in the case of the Poisson chain ladder, an increase in mesh size always increases the variance of the loss reserve estimate (subject to mild technical conditions). The case of the Mack chain ladder is more nuanced in that an increase in variance is not always guaranteed. Whether or not an increase or decrease occurs depends on the numerical values of certain of the age-to-age factors actually observed. The threshold values of the age-to-age factors at which an increase transitions to a decrease in variance are calculated. In the case of a change in the mesh of development periods, but with no change to accident periods, these values are computed for one particular data set, where it is found that variance always increases. It is conjectured that data sets in which this does not happen would be relatively rare. The situation is somewhat different when changes in mesh size over accident periods are considered. Here, the question of an increase or decrease in variance is more complex, and, in general terms, the occurrence of an increase in variance with increased mesh size is less likely.

Suggested Citation

  • Greg Taylor, 2025. "The Mack Chain Ladder and Data Granularity for Preserved Development Periods," Risks, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-32, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:7:p:132-:d:1696457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/7/132/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/7/132/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gisler, Alois, 2019. "The Reserve Uncertainties In The Chain Ladder Model Of Mack Revisited," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(3), pages 787-821, September.
    2. Greg Taylor, 2025. "The Exponential Dispersion Family (EDF) Chain Ladder and Data Granularity," Risks, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Taylor, G. C. & Ashe, F. R., 1983. "Second moments of estimates of outstanding claims," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 37-61, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gao, Guangyuan & Meng, Shengwang & Shi, Yanlin, 2021. "Dispersion modelling of outstanding claims with double Poisson regression models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 572-586.
    2. Nils Engler & Filip Lindskog, 2023. "Mack's estimator motivated by large exposure asymptotics in a compound Poisson setting," Papers 2310.12056, arXiv.org.
    3. England, Peter, 2002. "Addendum to "Analytic and bootstrap estimates of prediction errors in claims reserving"," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 461-466, December.
    4. Pitselis, Georgios & Grigoriadou, Vasiliki & Badounas, Ioannis, 2015. "Robust loss reserving in a log-linear model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 14-27.
    5. D. Kuang & B. Nielsen, 2018. "Generalized Log-Normal Chain-Ladder," Papers 1806.05939, arXiv.org.
    6. Álvarez-Jareño, José Antonio & Coll-Serrano, Vicente, 2012. "Estimación de reservas en una compañía aseguradora. Una aplicación en Excel del método Chain-Ladder y Bootstrap || Estimating the Reserves in Insurance Companies: An Excel Application of the Chain-Lad," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 14(1), pages 124-136, December.
    7. Doray, Louis G., 1996. "UMVUE of the IBNR reserve in a lognormal linear regression model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 43-57, May.
    8. Nataliya Chukhrova & Arne Johannssen, 2021. "Stochastic Claims Reserving Methods with State Space Representations: A Review," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-55, November.
    9. Stephens, David A. & Crowder, Martin J. & Dellaportas, Petros, 2004. "Quantification of automobile insurance liability: a Bayesian failure time approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Portugal, Luís & Pantelous, Athanasios A. & Verrall, Richard, 2021. "Univariate and multivariate claims reserving with Generalized Link Ratios," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 57-67.
    11. Heberle, Jochen & Thomas, Anne, 2014. "Combining chain-ladder claims reserving with fuzzy numbers," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 96-104.
    12. Leonardo Costa & Adrian Pizzinga, 2020. "State‐space models for predicting IBNR reserve in row‐wise ordered runoff triangles: Calendar year IBNR reserves & tail effects," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 438-448, April.
    13. Adrian Pizzinga & Marcelo Fernandes, 2021. "Extensions to the invariance property of maximum likelihood estimation for affine‐transformed state‐space models," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 355-371, May.
    14. repec:ehu:cuader:21773 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Verrall, R.J. & England, P.D., 2005. "Incorporating expert opinion into a stochastic model for the chain-ladder technique," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 355-370, October.
    16. Greg Taylor & Gráinne McGuire, 2023. "Model Error (or Ambiguity) and Its Estimation, with Particular Application to Loss Reserving," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-28, October.
    17. N. Miklós Arató & László Martinek, 2022. "The Quality of Reserve Risk Calculation Models under Solvency II and IFRS 17," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, October.
    18. Taylor, Greg, 2021. "A special Tweedie sub-family with application to loss reserving prediction error," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 262-288.
    19. Steinmetz, Julia & Jentsch, Carsten, 2022. "Asymptotic theory for Mack's model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 223-268.
    20. Björkwall, Susanna & Hössjer, Ola & Ohlsson, Esbjörn & Verrall, Richard, 2011. "A generalized linear model with smoothing effects for claims reserving," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 27-37, July.
    21. M. Goovaerts & J. Dhaene & E. Vanden Borre, 2001. "Some Remarks on IBNR Evaluation Techniques," Review of Business and Economic Literature, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature, vol. 0(4), pages 525-532.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:7:p:132-:d:1696457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.