IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v12y2024i1p9-d1312106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socially Responsible Investment Funds—An Analysis Applied to Funds Domiciled in the Portuguese and Spanish Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Luísa Carvalho

    (ISCAP, Polytechnic of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Carlos Mota

    (CEOS.PP, ISCAP, Polytechnic of Porto, rua Jaime Lopes Amorim, São Mamede de Infesta, 4465-004 Porto, Portugal)

  • Patrícia Ramos

    (CEOS.PP, ISCAP, Polytechnic of Porto, rua Jaime Lopes Amorim, São Mamede de Infesta, 4465-004 Porto, Portugal
    INESC TEC, Campus da FEUP, rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

Socially responsible investments, also referred to as ethical or sustainable investments, have experienced rapid global growth in recent years. They represent an investment approach that incorporates social, environmental, and ethical considerations into decision-making processes. Consequently, the significance of socially responsible investments has captured the attention of academics, prompting inquiries into the impact of integrating social criteria on portfolio performance. The primary objective of this work was to conduct a comparative study of the performance between socially responsible and non-socially responsible investment funds, using funds domiciled in Portugal and Spain. Various multi-factor models, including the three-factor model of Fama and French, the four-factor model of Carhart, and the five-factor model of Fama and French, were employed to assess performance. The sample comprised 125 investment funds, with 43 identified as socially responsible and 82 as non-socially responsible. The study’s findings indicate that there are no significant differences between socially responsible funds and their conventional counterparts. The majority of funds experience performance alterations during periods of crisis compared to crisis-free periods. Additionally, when comparing non-conditional models with conditional models, an improvement in the explanatory power of the latter is observed. This suggests that the inclusion of the dummy variable enhances the quality of fit for the models.

Suggested Citation

  • Luísa Carvalho & Carlos Mota & Patrícia Ramos, 2024. "Socially Responsible Investment Funds—An Analysis Applied to Funds Domiciled in the Portuguese and Spanish Markets," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:9-:d:1312106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/12/1/9/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/12/1/9/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saiful Arefeen & Koji Shimada, 2020. "Performance and Resilience of Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) and Conventional Funds during Different Shocks in 2016: Evidence from Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Broadstock, David C. & Chan, Kalok & Cheng, Louis T.W. & Wang, Xiaowei, 2021. "The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    3. Nofsinger, John & Varma, Abhishek, 2014. "Socially responsible funds and market crises," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 180-193.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel N. F. Plattek & Otávio H. S. Figueiredo, 2023. "Sustainable and Governance Investment Funds in Brazil: A Performance Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Muneer Shaik & Mohd Ziaur Rehman, 2023. "The Dynamic Volatility Connectedness of Major Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Stock Indices: Evidence Based on DCC-GARCH Model," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 30(1), pages 231-246, March.
    3. Heena Thanki & Sweety Shah & Harishchandra Singh Rathod & Ankit D. Oza & Dumitru Doru Burduhos-Nergis, 2022. "I Am Ready to Invest in Socially Responsible Investments (SRI) Options Only If the Returns Are Not Compromised: Individual Investors’ Intentions toward SRI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Singh, Amanjot & Patel, Ritesh & Singh, Harminder, 2022. "Recalibration of priorities: Investor preference and Russia-Ukraine conflict," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    5. Helen Chiappini & Gianfranco Vento & Leonardo De Palma, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 Lockdowns on Sustainable Indexes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Saif-Alyousfi, Abdulazeez Y.H. & Saha, Asish & Alshammari, Turki Rashed, 2023. "Bank diversification and ESG activities: A global perspective," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 47(3).
    7. Pedini, Luca & Severini, Sabrina, 2022. "Exploring the hedge, diversifier and safe haven properties of ESG investments: A cross-quantilogram analysis," MPRA Paper 112339, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Hacıömeroğlu, Hande Ayaydın & Danışoğlu, Seza & Güner, Z. Nuray, 2022. "For the love of the environment: An analysis of Green versus Brown bonds during the COVID-19 pandemic," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    9. Bax, Karoline & Sahin, Özge & Czado, Claudia & Paterlini, Sandra, 2023. "ESG, risk, and (tail) dependence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    10. Fabio Pisani & Giorgia Russo, 2021. "Sustainable Finance and COVID-19: The Reaction of ESG Funds to the 2020 Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Andrea Jacob & Martin Nerlinger, 2021. "Investors’ Delight? Climate Risk in Stock Valuation during COVID-19 and Beyond," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Zhang, Ning & Zhang, Yue & Zong, Zhe, 2023. "Fund ESG performance and downside risk: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    13. Vincenzo D'Apice & Giovanni Ferri & Mariantonietta Intonti, 2021. "Sustainable disclosure versus ESG intensity: Is there a cross effect between holding and SRI funds?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1496-1510, September.
    14. Díaz, Antonio & Esparcia, Carlos & López, Raquel, 2022. "The diversifying role of socially responsible investments during the COVID-19 crisis: A risk management and portfolio performance analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 39-60.
    15. Iqbal Owadally & Jean-René Mwizere & Neema Kalidas & Kalyanie Murugesu & Muhammad Kashif, 2021. "Long-Term Sustainable Investment for Retirement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.
    16. Rocco Caferra & Pasquale Marcello Falcone & Andrea Morone & Piergiuseppe Morone, 2022. "Is COVID-19 anticipating the future? Evidence from investors’ sustainable orientation," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(1), pages 177-196, March.
    17. Omura, Akihiro & Roca, Eduardo & Nakai, Miwa, 2021. "Does responsible investing pay during economic downturns: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    18. Leonardo Becchetti & Emanuele Bobbio & Federico Prizia & Lorenzo Semplici, 2022. "Going Deeper into the S of ESG: A Relational Approach to the Definition of Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, August.
    19. Tian, Zengrui & Zhu, Bingsheng & Lu, Yuzhong, 2023. "The governance of non-state shareholders and corporate ESG: Empirical evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    20. Guillermo Badía & Luis Ferruz & Maria Céu Cortez, 2021. "The performance of social responsible investing from retail investors' perspective: international evidence," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 6074-6088, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:9-:d:1312106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.