IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i24p3319-d706534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Event Study: Advanced Machine Learning and Statistical Technique for Analyzing Sustainability in Banking Stocks

Author

Listed:
  • Varun Dogra

    (School of Computer Science and Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144401, India)

  • Aman Singh

    (School of Computer Science and Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144401, India)

  • Sahil Verma

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chandigarh University, Mohali 140413, India)

  • Abdullah Alharbi

    (Department of Information Technology, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia)

  • Wael Alosaimi

    (Department of Information Technology, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Machine learning has grown in popularity in recent years as a method for evaluating financial text data, with promising results in stock price projection from financial news. Various research has looked at the relationship between news events and stock prices, but there is little evidence on how different sentiments (negative, neutral, and positive) of such events impact the performance of stocks or indices in comparison to benchmark indices. The goal of this paper is to analyze how a specific banking news event (such as a fraud or a bank merger) and other co-related news events (such as government policies or national elections), as well as the framing of both the news event and news-event sentiment, impair the formation of the respective bank’s stock and the banking index, i.e., Bank Nifty, in Indian stock markets over time. The task is achieved through three phases. In the first phase, we extract the banking and other co-related news events from the pool of financial news. The news events are further categorized into negative, positive, and neutral sentiments in the second phase. This study covers the third phase of our research work, where we analyze the impact of news events concerning sentiments or linguistics in the price movement of the respective bank’s stock, identified or recognized from these news events, against benchmark index Bank Nifty and the banking index against benchmark index Nifty50 for the short to long term. For the short term, we analyzed the movement of banking stock or index to benchmark index in terms of CARs (cumulative abnormal returns) surrounding the publication day (termed as D) of the news event in the event windows of (−1,D), (D,1), (−1,1), (D,5), (−5,−1), and (−5,5). For the long term, we analyzed the movement of banking stock or index to benchmark index in the event windows of (D,30), (−30,−1), (−30,30), (D,60), (−60,−1), and (−60,60). We explore the deep learning model, bidirectional encoder representations from transformers, and statistical method CAPM for this research.

Suggested Citation

  • Varun Dogra & Aman Singh & Sahil Verma & Abdullah Alharbi & Wael Alosaimi, 2021. "Event Study: Advanced Machine Learning and Statistical Technique for Analyzing Sustainability in Banking Stocks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(24), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:24:p:3319-:d:706534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/24/3319/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/24/3319/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ho, Kin-Yip & Shi, Yanlin & Zhang, Zhaoyong, 2020. "News and return volatility of Chinese bank stocks," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1095-1105.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shen, Yiran & Liu, Chang & Sun, Xiaolei & Guo, Kun, 2023. "Investor sentiment and the Chinese new energy stock market: A risk–return perspective," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 395-408.
    2. Sapkota, Niranjan, 2022. "News-based sentiment and bitcoin volatility," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    3. Semei Coronado & Jose N. Martinez & Victor Gualajara & Rafael Romero-Meza & Omar Rojas, 2023. "Time-Varying Granger Causality of COVID-19 News on Emerging Financial Markets: The Latin American Case," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Tonmoy Choudhury & Simone Scagnelli & Jaime Yong & Zhaoyong Zhang, 2021. "Non-Traditional Systemic Risk Contagion within the Chinese Banking Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Li, Hong & Shi, Yanlin, 2021. "A new unique information share measure with applications on cross-listed Chinese banks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    6. Bouteska, Ahmed & Cardillo, Giovanni & Harasheh, Murad, 2023. "Is it all about noise? Investor sentiment and risk nexus: evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    7. Kao, Yu-Sheng & Zhao, Kai & Chuang, Hwei-Lin & Ku, Yu-Cheng, 2024. "The asymmetric relationships between the Bitcoin futures’ return, volatility, and trading volume," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PA), pages 524-542.
    8. Feng, Lingbing & Fu, Tong & Shi, Yanlin, 2022. "How does news sentiment affect the states of Japanese stock return volatility?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:24:p:3319-:d:706534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.