IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i7p1214-d1629768.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Random Generalized Additive Logistic Forest: A Novel Ensemble Method for Robust Binary Classification

Author

Listed:
  • Oyebayo Ridwan Olaniran

    (Department of Statistics, Faculty of Physical Sciences, University of Ilorin, Ilorin 1515, Nigeria
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ali Rashash R. Alzahrani

    (Mathematics Department, Faculty of Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Nada MohammedSaeed Alharbi

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Al-Munawara 42353, Saudi Arabia)

  • Asma Ahmad Alzahrani

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Al-Baha University, Alaqiq, Al-Baha 65799, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Ensemble methods have proven highly effective in enhancing predictive performance by combining multiple models. We introduce a novel ensemble approach, the Random Generalized Additive Logistic Forest (RGALF), which integrates generalized additive models (GAMs) within a random forest framework to improve binary classification tasks. Unlike traditional random forests, which rely on piecewise constant predictions in terminal nodes, RGALF fits GAM logistic regression (LR) models to the data in each terminal node, enabling it to capture complex nonlinear relationships and interactions among predictors. By aggregating these node-specific GAMs, RGALF addresses multicollinearity, enhances interpretability, and achieves superior bias–variance tradeoffs, particularly in nonlinear settings. Theoretical analysis confirms that RGALF achieves Stone’s optimal rates for additive models ( O ( n − 2 k / ( 2 k + d ) ) under appropriate conditions, outperforming the slower convergence of traditional random forests ( O ( n − 2 / 3 ) ). Furthermore, empirical results demonstrate RGALF’s effectiveness across both simulated and real-world datasets. In simulations, RGALF demonstrates superior performance over random forests (RFs), reducing variance by up to 69% and bias by 19% in nonlinear settings, with significant MSE improvements (0.032 vs. RF’s 0.054 at n = 1000 ), while achieving optimal convergence rates ( O ( n − 0.48 ) vs. RF’s O ( n − 0.29 ) ). On real-world medical datasets, RGALF attains near-perfect accuracy and AUC: 100% accuracy/AUC for Heart Failure and Hepatitis C (HCV) prediction, 99% accuracy/100% AUC for Pima Diabetes, and 98.8% accuracy/100% AUC for Indian Liver Patient (ILPD), outperforming state-of-the-art methods. Notably, RGALF captures complex biomarker interactions (BMI–insulin in diabetes) missed by traditional models.

Suggested Citation

  • Oyebayo Ridwan Olaniran & Ali Rashash R. Alzahrani & Nada MohammedSaeed Alharbi & Asma Ahmad Alzahrani, 2025. "Random Generalized Additive Logistic Forest: A Novel Ensemble Method for Robust Binary Classification," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:7:p:1214-:d:1629768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/7/1214/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/7/1214/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oyebayo Ridwan Olaniran & Aliu Omotayo Sikiru & Jeza Allohibi & Abdulmajeed Atiah Alharbi & Nada MohammedSaeed Alharbi, 2025. "Hybrid Random Feature Selection and Recurrent Neural Network for Diabetes Prediction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Dumitrescu, Elena & Hué, Sullivan & Hurlin, Christophe & Tokpavi, Sessi, 2022. "Machine learning for credit scoring: Improving logistic regression with non-linear decision-tree effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1178-1192.
    3. Amirhosein Mosavi & Farzaneh Sajedi Hosseini & Bahram Choubin & Massoud Goodarzi & Adrienn A. Dineva & Elham Rafiei Sardooi, 2021. "Ensemble Boosting and Bagging Based Machine Learning Models for Groundwater Potential Prediction," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(1), pages 23-37, January.
    4. Oyebayo Ridwan Olaniran & Ali Rashash R. Alzahrani & Mohammed R. Alzahrani, 2024. "Eigenvalue Distributions in Random Confusion Matrices: Applications to Machine Learning Evaluation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dangxing Chen & Weicheng Ye & Jiahui Ye, 2022. "Interpretable Selective Learning in Credit Risk," Papers 2209.10127, arXiv.org.
    2. Kagiso Samuel More & Christian Wolkersdorfer, 2022. "Predicting and Forecasting Mine Water Parameters Using a Hybrid Intelligent System," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(8), pages 2813-2826, June.
    3. Dangxing Chen & Luyao Zhang, 2023. "Monotonicity for AI ethics and society: An empirical study of the monotonic neural additive model in criminology, education, health care, and finance," Papers 2301.07060, arXiv.org.
    4. Li-Ya Wu & Sung-Shun Weng, 2021. "Ensemble Learning Models for Food Safety Risk Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-26, November.
    5. Sun, Weixin & Zhang, Xuantao & Li, Minghao & Wang, Yong, 2023. "Interpretable high-stakes decision support system for credit default forecasting," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    6. Al-Amin Abba Dabo & Amin Hosseinian-Far, 2023. "An Integrated Methodology for Enhancing Reverse Logistics Flows and Networks in Industry 5.0," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-26, December.
    7. repec:bdi:wptemi:mip_053_24 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Ma, Xuejiao & Che, Tianqi & Jiang, Qichuan, 2025. "A three-stage prediction model for firm default risk: An integration of text sentiment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    9. Miao Zhu & Ben-Chang Shia & Meng Su & Jialin Liu, 2024. "Consumer Default Risk Portrait: An Intelligent Management Framework of Online Consumer Credit Default Risk," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    10. Yusheng Li & Mengyi Sha, 2024. "Two‐stage credit risk prediction framework based on three‐way decisions with automatic threshold learning," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1263-1277, August.
    11. Oyebayo Ridwan Olaniran & Ali Rashash R. Alzahrani, 2025. "Bayesian Random Forest with Multiple Imputation by Chain Equations for High-Dimensional Missing Data: A Simulation Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-32, March.
    12. Simone Narizzano & Marco Orlandi & Antonio Scalia, 2024. "The Bank of Italy’s statistical model for the credit assessment of non-financial firms," Mercati, infrastrutture, sistemi di pagamento (Markets, Infrastructures, Payment Systems) 53, Bank of Italy, Directorate General for Markets and Payment System.
    13. Kriebel, Johannes & Stitz, Lennart, 2022. "Credit default prediction from user-generated text in peer-to-peer lending using deep learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 309-323.
    14. Nadia Ayed & Khemaies Bougatef, 2024. "Performance Assessment of Logistic Regression (LR), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Fuzzy Inference System (FIS) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy System (ANFIS) in Predicting Default Probability: The Case of," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(3), pages 1803-1835, September.
    15. John Martin & Sona Taheri & Mali Abdollahian, 2024. "Optimizing Ensemble Learning to Reduce Misclassification Costs in Credit Risk Scorecards," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    16. Tatjana Miljkovic & Pei Wang, 2025. "A dimension reduction assisted credit scoring method for big data with categorical features," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-30, December.
    17. Ahmad Jafarzadeh & Abbas Khashei-Siuki & Mohsen Pourreza-Bilondi, 2022. "Performance Assessment of Model Averaging Techniques to Reduce Structural Uncertainty of Groundwater Modeling," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(1), pages 353-377, January.
    18. Yang Liu & Fei Huang & Lili Ma & Qingguo Zeng & Jiale Shi, 2024. "Credit scoring prediction leveraging interpretable ensemble learning," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(2), pages 286-308, March.
    19. Firuz Kamalov & Hana Sulieman & Ayman Alzaatreh & Maher Emarly & Hasna Chamlal & Murodbek Safaraliev, 2025. "Mathematical Methods in Feature Selection: A Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-29, March.
    20. Shi, Yong & Qu, Yi & Chen, Zhensong & Mi, Yunlong & Wang, Yunong, 2024. "Improved credit risk prediction based on an integrated graph representation learning approach with graph transformation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 786-801.
    21. Li, Zhe & Liang, Shuguang & Pan, Xianyou & Pang, Meng, 2024. "Credit risk prediction based on loan profit: Evidence from Chinese SMEs," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:7:p:1214-:d:1629768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.