IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i6p949-d1611529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Synergistic Joint Model of Knowledge Graph and LLM for Enhancing XAI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Chaelim Park

    (School of Computing, Gachon University, Seongnam-si 13120, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Hayoung Lee

    (Artificial Intelligence Convergence Research Section, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI), Seongnam-si 13488, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Seonghee Lee

    (Artificial Intelligence Convergence Research Section, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI), Seongnam-si 13488, Republic of Korea)

  • Okran Jeong

    (School of Computing, Gachon University, Seongnam-si 13120, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Despite the excellent generalization capabilities of large-scale language models (LLMs), their severe limitations, such as illusions, lack of domain-specific knowledge, and ambiguity in the reasoning process, challenge their direct application to clinical decision support systems (CDSSs). To address these challenges, this study proposes a synergistic joint model that integrates knowledge graphs (KGs) and LLMs to enhance domain-specific knowledge and improve explainability in CDSSs. The proposed model leverages KGs to provide structured, domain-specific insights while utilizing LLMs’ generative capabilities to dynamically extract, refine, and expand medical knowledge. This bi-directional interaction ensures that CDSS recommendations remain both clinically accurate and contextually comprehensive. Performance evaluation of the joint model for mental health etiology, stress detection, and emotion recognition tasks of the CDSS showed up to a 12.0% increase in accuracy and an 8.6% increase in F1 score when compared to the standalone LLM model, with additional significant improvements when using the model with medical domain knowledge. Thus, the reliable and up-to-date domain knowledge obtained through the joint model not only improves the task performance of the CDSS, but also provides direct evidence of how such decisions were made. These findings validate the broad applicability and effectiveness of our KG–LLM joint model, highlighting its potential in real-world clinical decision support scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaelim Park & Hayoung Lee & Seonghee Lee & Okran Jeong, 2025. "Synergistic Joint Model of Knowledge Graph and LLM for Enhancing XAI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:6:p:949-:d:1611529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/6/949/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/6/949/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott Mayer McKinney & Marcin Sieniek & Varun Godbole & Jonathan Godwin & Natasha Antropova & Hutan Ashrafian & Trevor Back & Mary Chesus & Greg S. Corrado & Ara Darzi & Mozziyar Etemadi & Florencia G, 2020. "International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening," Nature, Nature, vol. 577(7788), pages 89-94, January.
    2. ., 2023. "The artificial intelligence ecosystem," Chapters, in: The Rise of Algorithmic Society and the Strategic Role of Arts and Culture, chapter 2, pages 6-30, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Scott Mayer McKinney & Marcin Sieniek & Varun Godbole & Jonathan Godwin & Natasha Antropova & Hutan Ashrafian & Trevor Back & Mary Chesus & Greg S. Corrado & Ara Darzi & Mozziyar Etemadi & Florencia G, 2020. "Addendum: International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening," Nature, Nature, vol. 586(7829), pages 19-19, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Majd Oteibi & Adam Tamimi & Kaneez Abbas & Gabriel Tamimi & Danesh Khazaei & Hadi Khazaei, 2024. "Advancing Digital Health using AI and Machine Learning Solutions for Early Ultrasonic Detection of Breast Disorders in Women," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 11(11), pages 518-527, November.
    2. Alexander P. L. Martindale & Carrie D. Llewellyn & Richard O. Visser & Benjamin Ng & Victoria Ngai & Aditya U. Kale & Lavinia Ferrante Ruffano & Robert M. Golub & Gary S. Collins & David Moher & Melis, 2024. "Concordance of randomised controlled trials for artificial intelligence interventions with the CONSORT-AI reporting guidelines," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Joachim Meyer, 2024. "Doing AI: Algorithmic decision support as a human activity," Papers 2402.14674, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    4. Babak Abedin & Christian Meske & Iris Junglas & Fethi Rabhi & Hamid R. Motahari-Nezhad, 2022. "Designing and Managing Human-AI Interactions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 691-697, June.
    5. Armando Vargas-Palacios & Nisha Sharma & Gurdeep S. Sagoo, 2023. "Cost-effectiveness requirements for implementing artificial intelligence technology in the Women’s UK Breast Cancer Screening service," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Weiguang Wang & Guodong (Gordon) Gao & Ritu Agarwal, 2024. "Friend or Foe? Teaming Between Artificial Intelligence and Workers with Variation in Experience," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(9), pages 5753-5775, September.
    7. Venkat Ram Reddy Ganuthula & Krishna Kumar Balaraman, 2025. "The Paradox of Professional Input: How Expert Collaboration with AI Systems Shapes Their Future Value," Papers 2504.12654, arXiv.org.
    8. Marie-Pierre Dargnies & Rustamdjan Hakimov & Dorothea Kübler, 2025. "Behavioral Measures Improve AI Hiring: A Field Experiment," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 532, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    9. Yuming Jiang & Zhicheng Zhang & Wei Wang & Weicai Huang & Chuanli Chen & Sujuan Xi & M. Usman Ahmad & Yulan Ren & Shengtian Sang & Jingjing Xie & Jen-Yeu Wang & Wenjun Xiong & Tuanjie Li & Zhen Han & , 2023. "Biology-guided deep learning predicts prognosis and cancer immunotherapy response," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Shu Jiang & Jiguo Cao & Bernard Rosner & Graham A. Colditz, 2023. "Supervised two‐dimensional functional principal component analysis with time‐to‐event outcomes and mammogram imaging data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 1359-1369, June.
    11. Helen M. L. Frazer & Carlos A. Peña-Solorzano & Chun Fung Kwok & Michael S. Elliott & Yuanhong Chen & Chong Wang & Jocelyn F. Lippey & John L. Hopper & Peter Brotchie & Gustavo Carneiro & Davis J. McC, 2024. "Comparison of AI-integrated pathways with human-AI interaction in population mammographic screening for breast cancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Minkyu Shin & Jin Kim & Bas van Opheusden & Thomas L. Griffiths, 2023. "Superhuman Artificial Intelligence Can Improve Human Decision Making by Increasing Novelty," Papers 2303.07462, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    13. Juexiao Zhou & Haoyang Li & Xingyu Liao & Bin Zhang & Wenjia He & Zhongxiao Li & Longxi Zhou & Xin Gao, 2023. "A unified method to revoke the private data of patients in intelligent healthcare with audit to forget," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Sebastian Schleidgen & Orsolya Friedrich & Selin Gerlek & Galia Assadi & Johanna Seifert, 2023. "The concept of “interaction” in debates on human–machine interaction," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Taynara de Oliveira Castellões & Paloma Maria Silva Rocha Rizol & Luiz Fernando Costa Nascimento, 2024. "Association between Premature Birth and Air Pollutants Using Fuzzy and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) Techniques," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-12, September.
    16. Jingxun Cai & Zne-Jung Lee & Zhihxian Lin & Chih-Hung Hsu & Yun Lin, 2024. "An Integrated Algorithm with Feature Selection, Data Augmentation, and XGBoost for Ovarian Cancer," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Qianwei Zhou & Margarita Zuley & Yuan Guo & Lu Yang & Bronwyn Nair & Adrienne Vargo & Suzanne Ghannam & Dooman Arefan & Shandong Wu, 2021. "A machine and human reader study on AI diagnosis model safety under attacks of adversarial images," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Mélanie Roschewitz & Galvin Khara & Joe Yearsley & Nisha Sharma & Jonathan J. James & Éva Ambrózay & Adam Heroux & Peter Kecskemethy & Tobias Rijken & Ben Glocker, 2023. "Automatic correction of performance drift under acquisition shift in medical image classification," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    19. Andrew Farlow & Alexander Hoffmann & Girmaw Abebe Tadesse & Deogratias Mzurikwao & Rob Beyer & Darlington Akogo & Eva Weicken & Tafadzwa Matika & MaryJane Ijeoma Nweje & Watu Wamae & Sako Arts & Thoma, 2023. "Rethinking global digital health and AI-for-health innovation challenges," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(4), pages 1-12, April.
    20. Berlinski, Elise & Morales, Jérémy & Sponem, Samuel, 2024. "Artificial imaginaries: Generative AIs as an advanced form of capitalism," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:6:p:949-:d:1611529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.