IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i3p442-d1579232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability, Accuracy, Fairness, and Explainability (SAFE) Machine Learning in Quantitative Trading

Author

Listed:
  • Phan Tien Dung

    (Department of Economics and Management, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy)

  • Paolo Giudici

    (Department of Economics and Management, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy)

Abstract

The paper investigates the application of advanced machine learning (ML) methodologies, with a particular emphasis on state-of-the-art deep learning models, to predict financial market dynamics and maximize profitability through algorithmic trading strategies. The study compares the predictive capabilities and behavioral characteristics of traditional machine learning approaches, such as logistic regression and support vector machines, with those of highly sophisticated deep learning architectures, including Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, and Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs). The findings underscore the fundamental distinctions between these methodologies, with deeply trained models exhibiting markedly different predictive behaviors and performance, particularly in capturing complex temporal patterns within financial data. A cornerstone of the paper is the introduction and rigorous analysis of a framework to evaluate models, by means of the SAFE framework (Sustainability, Accuracy, Fairness, and Explainability). The framework is designed to address the opacity of black-box ML models by systematically evaluating their behavior across a set of critical dimensions. It also demonstrates how models’ predictive outputs align with the observed data, thereby reinforcing their reliability and robustness. The paper leverages historical stock price data from International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). The dataset is partitioned into a training phase during which the models are calibrated, and a validation phase, used to evaluate the predictive performance of the generated trading signals. The study addresses two primary machine learning tasks: regression and classification. Classical models are utilized for classification tasks, with their outputs directly interpreted as trading signals, while advanced deep learning models are employed for regression, with predictions of future stock prices further processed into actionable trading strategies. To evaluate the effectiveness of each strategy, rigorous backtesting is conducted, incorporating visual representations such as equity curves to assess profitability and key risk metrics like maximum drawdown for risk management. Supplementary performance indicators, including hit rates and the incidence of false positions, are analyzed alongside the equity curves to provide a holistic assessment of each model’s performance. This comprehensive evaluation not only highlights the superiority of cutting-edge deep learning models in predicting financial market trends but also demonstrates the pivotal role of the SAFE framework in ensuring that machine learning models remain trustworthy, interpretable, and aligned with ethical considerations.

Suggested Citation

  • Phan Tien Dung & Paolo Giudici, 2025. "Sustainability, Accuracy, Fairness, and Explainability (SAFE) Machine Learning in Quantitative Trading," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-35, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:442-:d:1579232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/3/442/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/3/442/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fischer, Thomas & Krauss, Christopher, 2018. "Deep learning with long short-term memory networks for financial market predictions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 654-669.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei Dai & Yuan An & Wen Long, 2021. "Price change prediction of ultra high frequency financial data based on temporal convolutional network," Papers 2107.00261, arXiv.org.
    2. Shao, Zhen & Zheng, Qingru & Yang, Shanlin & Gao, Fei & Cheng, Manli & Zhang, Qiang & Liu, Chen, 2020. "Modeling and forecasting the electricity clearing price: A novel BELM based pattern classification framework and a comparative analytic study on multi-layer BELM and LSTM," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    3. Kamaladdin Fataliyev & Aneesh Chivukula & Mukesh Prasad & Wei Liu, 2021. "Stock Market Analysis with Text Data: A Review," Papers 2106.12985, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    4. Giacomo di Tollo & Joseph Andria & Gianni Filograsso, 2023. "The Predictive Power of Social Media Sentiment: Evidence from Cryptocurrencies and Stock Markets Using NLP and Stochastic ANNs," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Hu, Xiao & Kang, Siqin & Ren, Long & Zhu, Shaokeng, 2024. "Interactive preference analysis: A reinforcement learning framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 319(3), pages 983-998.
    6. Wang, Jianzhou & Lv, Mengzheng & Wang, Shuai & Gao, Jialu & Zhao, Yang & Wang, Qiangqiang, 2024. "Can multi-period auto-portfolio systems improve returns? Evidence from Chinese and U.S. stock markets," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    7. Ghosh, Indranil & Chaudhuri, Tamal Datta & Alfaro-Cortés, Esteban & Gámez, Matías & García, Noelia, 2022. "A hybrid approach to forecasting futures prices with simultaneous consideration of optimality in ensemble feature selection and advanced artificial intelligence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    8. Sina Montazeri & Akram Mirzaeinia & Haseebullah Jumakhan & Amir Mirzaeinia, 2024. "CNN-DRL for Scalable Actions in Finance," Papers 2401.06179, arXiv.org.
    9. Nosratabadi, Saeed & Mosavi, Amir & Duan, Puhong & Ghamisi, Pedram & Filip, Ferdinand & Band, Shahab S. & Reuter, Uwe & Gama, Joao & Gandomi, Amir H., 2020. "Data science in economics: comprehensive review of advanced machine learning and deep learning methods," FrenXiv e75gc_v1, Center for Open Science.
    10. Alameer, Zakaria & Elaziz, Mohamed Abd & Ewees, Ahmed A. & Ye, Haiwang & Jianhua, Zhang, 2019. "Forecasting gold price fluctuations using improved multilayer perceptron neural network and whale optimization algorithm," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 250-260.
    11. Bartosz Bieganowski & Robert 'Slepaczuk, 2024. "Supervised Autoencoders with Fractionally Differentiated Features and Triple Barrier Labelling Enhance Predictions on Noisy Data," Papers 2411.12753, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    12. Rad, Hossein & Low, Rand Kwong Yew & Miffre, Joëlle & Faff, Robert, 2023. "The commodity risk premium and neural networks," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    13. Suyuan Luo & Tsan-Ming Choi, 2024. "Great partners: how deep learning and blockchain help improve business operations together," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(1), pages 53-78, August.
    14. Mst. Shapna Akter & Hossain Shahriar & Reaz Chowdhury & M. R. C. Mahdy, 2022. "Forecasting the Risk Factor of Frontier Markets: A Novel Stacking Ensemble of Neural Network Approach," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, August.
    15. Nosratabadi, Saeed & Mosavi, Amir & Duan, Puhong & Ghamisi, Pedram & Filip, Ferdinand & Band, Shahab S. & Reuter, Uwe & Gama, Joao & Gandomi, Amir H., 2020. "Data science in economics: comprehensive review of advanced machine learning and deep learning methods," Thesis Commons auyvc_v1, Center for Open Science.
    16. Noura Metawa & Mohamemd I. Alghamdi & Ibrahim M. El-Hasnony & Mohamed Elhoseny, 2021. "Return Rate Prediction in Blockchain Financial Products Using Deep Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Kentaro Imajo & Kentaro Minami & Katsuya Ito & Kei Nakagawa, 2020. "Deep Portfolio Optimization via Distributional Prediction of Residual Factors," Papers 2012.07245, arXiv.org.
    18. Junjie Guo, 2024. "Deep Learning in Long-Short Stock Portfolio Allocation: An Empirical Study," Papers 2411.13555, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    19. Kailai Ni & Jianzhou Wang & Guangyu Tang & Danxiang Wei, 2019. "Research and Application of a Novel Hybrid Model Based on a Deep Neural Network for Electricity Load Forecasting: A Case Study in Australia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-30, June.
    20. Jie Fang & Jianwu Lin & Shutao Xia & Yong Jiang & Zhikang Xia & Xiang Liu, 2020. "Neural Network-based Automatic Factor Construction," Papers 2008.06225, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2020.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:442-:d:1579232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.