IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i11p1813-d1667186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Extreme Value Support Measure Machine for Group Anomaly Detection

Author

Listed:
  • Lixuan An

    (Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Bernard De Baets

    (Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Stijn Luca

    (Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium)

Abstract

Group anomaly detection is a subfield of pattern recognition that aims at detecting anomalous groups rather than individual anomalous points. However, existing approaches mainly target the unusual aggregate of points in high-density regions. In this way, unusual group behavior with a number of points located in low-density regions is not fully detected. In this paper, we propose a systematic approach based on extreme value theory (EVT), a field of statistics adept at modeling the tails of a distribution where data are sparse, and one-class support measure machines (OCSMMs) to quantify anomalous group behavior comprehensively. First, by applying EVT to a point process model , we construct an analytical model describing the likelihood of an aggregate within a group with respect to low-density regions, aimed at capturing anomalous group behavior in such regions. This model is then combined with a calibrated OCSMM, which provides probabilistic outputs to characterize anomalous group behavior in high-density regions, enabling improved assessment of overall anomalous group behavior. Extensive experiments on simulated and real-world data demonstrate that our method outperforms existing group anomaly detectors across diverse scenarios, showing its effectiveness in quantifying and interpreting various types of anomalous group behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Lixuan An & Bernard De Baets & Stijn Luca, 2025. "The Extreme Value Support Measure Machine for Group Anomaly Detection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-33, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:11:p:1813-:d:1667186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/11/1813/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/11/1813/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Grabisch & Jean-Luc Marichal & Radko Mesiar & Endre Pap, 2009. "Aggregation functions," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00445120, HAL.
    2. Wulan Anggraeni & Sudradjat Supian & Sukono & Nurfadhlina Binti Abdul Halim, 2022. "Earthquake Catastrophe Bond Pricing Using Extreme Value Theory: A Mini-Review Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Luca, Stijn E. & Pimentel, Marco A.F. & Watkinson, Peter J. & Clifton, David A., 2018. "Point process models for novelty detection on spatial point patterns and their extremes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 86-103.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luca Anzilli & Silvio Giove, 2020. "Multi-criteria and medical diagnosis for application to health insurance systems: a general approach through non-additive measures," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 43(2), pages 559-582, December.
    2. Ya-Qiang Xu & Le-Sheng Jin & Zhen-Song Chen & Ronald R. Yager & Jana Špirková & Martin Kalina & Surajit Borkotokey, 2022. "Weight Vector Generation in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making with Basic Uncertain Information," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-11, February.
    3. Peter Reichert & Klemens Niederberger & Peter Rey & Urs Helg & Susanne Haertel-Borer, 2019. "The need for unconventional value aggregation techniques: experiences from eliciting stakeholder preferences in environmental management," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 7(3), pages 197-219, November.
    4. Grabisch, Michel & Rusinowska, Agnieszka, 2013. "A model of influence based on aggregation functions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 316-330.
    5. Vicenç Torra, 2022. "Andness Directedness for t-Norms and t-Conorms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-10, May.
    6. Chunqiao Tan & Xiaohong Chen, 2016. "Generalized Archimedean Intuitionistic Fuzzy Averaging Aggregation Operators and their Application to Multicriteria Decision-Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 311-352, March.
    7. José Luis García-Lapresta & Casilda Lasso de la Vega & Ricardo Alberto Marques Pereira & Ana Marta Urrutia, 2010. "A class of poverty measures induced by the dual decomposition of aggregation functions," Working Papers 160, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    8. Bonifacio Llamazares, 2019. "An Analysis of Winsorized Weighted Means," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 907-933, October.
    9. Karlson Pfannschmidt & Pritha Gupta & Bjorn Haddenhorst & Eyke Hullermeier, 2019. "Learning Context-Dependent Choice Functions," Papers 1901.10860, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2021.
    10. Riza Andrian Ibrahim & Sukono & Herlina Napitupulu & Rose Irnawaty Ibrahim, 2023. "How to Price Catastrophe Bonds for Sustainable Earthquake Funding? A Systematic Review of the Pricing Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, May.
    11. Fabrizio Durante & Juan Fernández-Sánchez & Wolfgang Trutschnig & Manuel Úbeda-Flores, 2020. "On the Size of Subclasses of Quasi-Copulas and Their Dedekind–MacNeille Completion," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Belles-Sampera, Jaume & Merigó, José M. & Guillén, Montserrat & Santolino, Miguel, 2013. "The connection between distortion risk measures and ordered weighted averaging operators," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 411-420.
    13. Saminger-Platz Susanne & De Jesús Arias-García José & Mesiar Radko & Klement Erich Peter, 2017. "Characterizations of bivariate conic, extreme value, and Archimax copulas," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 45-58, January.
    14. Luc Paugam & Jean-François Casta, 2010. "Mesurer le capital organisationnel comme combinaison de ressources," Post-Print halshs-00494560, HAL.
    15. Yasuo Narukawa & Vicenç Torra & Michio Sugeno, 2016. "Choquet integral with respect to a symmetric fuzzy measure of a function on the real line," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 244(2), pages 571-581, September.
    16. Kołacz, Adam & Grzegorzewski, Przemysław, 2016. "Measures of dispersion for multidimensional data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 930-937.
    17. Alessio Bonetti & Silvia Bortot & Mario Fedrizzi & Silvio Giove & Ricardo Alberto Marques Pereira & Andrea Molinari, 2011. "Modelling group processes and effort estimation in Project Management using the Choquet integral: an MCDM approach," DISA Working Papers 2011/12, Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy, revised Sep 2011.
    18. Marta Cardin, 2023. "Rights Systems and Aggregation Functions on Property Spaces," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-10, August.
    19. Sukono & Herlina Napitupulu & Riaman & Riza Andrian Ibrahim & Muhamad Deni Johansyah & Rizki Apriva Hidayana, 2023. "A Regional Catastrophe Bond Pricing Model and Its Application in Indonesia’s Provinces," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    20. Labreuche, Christophe & Grabisch, Michel, 2018. "Using multiple reference levels in Multi-Criteria Decision aid: The Generalized-Additive Independence model and the Choquet integral approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 598-611.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:11:p:1813-:d:1667186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.