IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i22p4650-d1280540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choquet-like Integrals with Multi-Neighborhood Approximation Numbers for Novel Covering Granular Reduction Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Jingqian Wang

    (School of Mathematics and Data Science, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710021, China)

  • Songtao Shao

    (School of Mathematics and Data Science, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710021, China)

  • Xiaohong Zhang

    (School of Mathematics and Data Science, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710021, China
    Shaanxi Joint Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710021, China)

Abstract

Covering granular reduction is an important issue in multi-covering information systems. The main methods to solve this problem are set operators. How to solve this problem by quantitative analysis is an interesting topic. Furthermore, as a type of nonlinear fuzzy aggregation function (which is a quantitative tool), Choquet-like integrals with fuzzy measures are widely used in many files. However, the corresponding fuzzy measures in Choquet-like integrals are given by man, not by data. In this work, we present two types of multi-neighborhood approximation numbers in multi-covering information systems, which are used to establish Choquet-like integrals. Furthermore, they are applied to deal with the problem of granular reduction in multi-covering information systems. First, the notions of lower and upper multi-neighborhood approximation numbers are presented in a multi-covering information system, as well as their properties. Furthermore, some conditions under which multi-covering information systems induce the same lower and upper multi-neighborhood approximation numbers are presented. Second, two covering granular reduction methods based on multi-neighborhood approximation numbers are presented in multi-covering information systems. Third, multi-neighborhood approximation numbers are used to establish Choquet-like integrals, which are applied in covering granular reduction. Finally, these methods are compared with existing methods through experiments, which are used to demonstrate the effectiveness and benefits of our methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingqian Wang & Songtao Shao & Xiaohong Zhang, 2023. "Choquet-like Integrals with Multi-Neighborhood Approximation Numbers for Novel Covering Granular Reduction Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-20, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:22:p:4650-:d:1280540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/22/4650/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/22/4650/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Waegenaere, Anja & Wakker, Peter P., 2001. "Nonmonotonic Choquet integrals," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 45-60, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Zengjing & Kulperger, Reg, 2006. "Minimax pricing and Choquet pricing," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 518-528, June.
    2. Diecidue, Enrico & Wakker, Peter P., 2002. "Dutch books: avoiding strategic and dynamic complications, and a comonotonic extension," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 135-149, March.
    3. Chateauneuf, Alain & Ventura, Caroline, 2013. "G-continuity, impatience and myopia for Choquet multi-period utilities," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 97-105.
    4. Ghirardato, Paolo & Pennesi, Daniele, 2020. "A general theory of subjective mixtures," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Ruodu Wang & Yunran Wei, 2020. "Risk functionals with convex level sets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1337-1367, October.
    6. Furman, Edward & Wang, Ruodu & Zitikis, Ričardas, 2017. "Gini-type measures of risk and variability: Gini shortfall, capital allocations, and heavy-tailed risks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 70-84.
    7. Marta Cardin, 2005. "Preference Rapresentation for Multicriteria Decision Making," GE, Growth, Math methods 0511009, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. André Lapied & Olivier Renault, 2012. "An Investigation of Time Consistency for Subjective Discontinued Utility," Working Papers halshs-00793174, HAL.
    9. Wakai, Katsutoshi, 2011. "Modeling nonmonotone preferences: The case of utility smoothing," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 213-226, March.
    10. De Waegenaere, Anja & Kast, Robert & Lapied, Andre, 2003. "Choquet pricing and equilibrium," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 359-370, July.
    11. Chateauneuf, Alain & Rebille, Yann, 2004. "Some characterizations of non-additive multi-period models," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 235-250, November.
    12. Lorenza Campagnolo & Carlo Carraro & Marinella Davide & Fabio Eboli & Elisa Lanzi & Ramiro Parrado, 2016. "Can climate policy enhance sustainability?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 639-653, August.
    13. Xia Han & Ruodu Wang & Xun Yu Zhou, 2022. "Choquet regularization for reinforcement learning," Papers 2208.08497, arXiv.org.
    14. Yaarit Even & Ehud Lehrer, 2014. "Decomposition-integral: unifying Choquet and the concave integrals," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 56(1), pages 33-58, May.
    15. André Lapied & Robert Kast, 2005. "Updating Choquet valuation and discounting information arrivals," Working Papers 05-09, LAMETA, Universtiy of Montpellier, revised Jan 2005.
    16. Fernández, J.R. & Gallego, I. & Jiménez-Losada, A. & Ordóñez, M., 2016. "Cooperation among agents with a proximity relation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 555-565.
    17. Schmidt, Ulrich & Zank, Horst, 2009. "A simple model of cumulative prospect theory," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3-4), pages 308-319, March.
    18. Faruk Gul & Paulo Natenzon & Wolfgang Pesendorfer, 2020. "Random Evolving Lotteries and Intrinsic Preference for Information," Working Papers 2020-71, Princeton University. Economics Department..
    19. Silvia Bortot & Mario Fedrizzi & Silvio Giove, 2011. "Modelling fraud detection by attack trees and Choquet integral," DISA Working Papers 2011/09, Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy, revised 31 Aug 2011.
    20. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5446 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Kirsten Rohde, 2010. "A preference foundation for Fehr and Schmidt’s model of inequity aversion," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 34(4), pages 537-547, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:22:p:4650-:d:1280540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.