IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i13p2934-d1183633.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust-DETM: Distributed Energy Trading Model Based on Trusted Execution Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Lu

    (School of Cyberspace Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Hongchen Guo

    (School of Cyberspace Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

The traditional centralized power trading model suffers from high maintenance costs, low processing efficiency and unsynchronized information, and it cannot adapt to the high-frequency and small-dollar distributed energy trading scenario. To address the above issues, we propose Trust-DETM, a model for the implementation of distributed energy trading based on a trusted execution environment. First, we introduce a reputation metric mechanism and propose a transaction matching algorithm based on the reputation metric to achieve the accurate matching of transaction objects. Secondly, as the distributed energy trading model lacks an effective trust mechanism, we propose a commitment scheme based on smart contracts and a trusted execution environment to solve the trust problem between producers and consumers. Finally, we conduct a comprehensive experimental evaluation of the efficiency of Trust-DETM. Through comparative experiments, we find that Trust-DETM achieves trade matching and trusted execution in a lower simultaneous running time than comparable distributed trading models.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Lu & Hongchen Guo, 2023. "Trust-DETM: Distributed Energy Trading Model Based on Trusted Execution Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:13:p:2934-:d:1183633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/13/2934/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/13/2934/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. W. Kuhn, 1955. "The Hungarian method for the assignment problem," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(1‐2), pages 83-97, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weiqiang Shen & Chuanlin Zhang & Xiaona Zhang & Jinglun Shi, 2019. "A fully distributed deployment algorithm for underwater strong k-barrier coverage using mobile sensors," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(4), pages 15501477198, April.
    2. Bo Cowgill & Jonathan M. V. Davis & B. Pablo Montagnes & Patryk Perkowski, 2024. "Stable Matching on the Job? Theory and Evidence on Internal Talent Markets," CESifo Working Paper Series 11120, CESifo.
    3. András Frank, 2005. "On Kuhn's Hungarian Method—A tribute from Hungary," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(1), pages 2-5, February.
    4. Amit Kumar & Anila Gupta, 2013. "Mehar’s methods for fuzzy assignment problems with restrictions," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 27-44, March.
    5. Nisse, Nicolas & Salch, Alexandre & Weber, Valentin, 2023. "Recovery of disrupted airline operations using k-maximum matching in graphs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1061-1072.
    6. Parvin Ahmadi & Iman Gholampour & Mahmoud Tabandeh, 2018. "Cluster-based sparse topical coding for topic mining and document clustering," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 12(3), pages 537-558, September.
    7. Bachtenkirch, David & Bock, Stefan, 2022. "Finding efficient make-to-order production and batch delivery schedules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 133-152.
    8. Omar Zatarain & Jesse Yoe Rumbo-Morales & Silvia Ramos-Cabral & Gerardo Ortíz-Torres & Felipe d. J. Sorcia-Vázquez & Iván Guillén-Escamilla & Juan Carlos Mixteco-Sánchez, 2023. "A Method for Perception and Assessment of Semantic Textual Similarities in English," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, June.
    9. Chenchen Ma & Jing Ouyang & Gongjun Xu, 2023. "Learning Latent and Hierarchical Structures in Cognitive Diagnosis Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 175-207, March.
    10. Winker, Peter, 2023. "Visualizing Topic Uncertainty in Topic Modelling," VfS Annual Conference 2023 (Regensburg): Growth and the "sociale Frage" 277584, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    11. Tran Hoang Hai, 2020. "Estimation of volatility causality in structural autoregressions with heteroskedasticity using independent component analysis," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Delafield, Gemma & Smith, Greg S. & Day, Brett & Holland, Robert A. & Donnison, Caspar & Hastings, Astley & Taylor, Gail & Owen, Nathan & Lovett, Andrew, 2024. "Spatial context matters: Assessing how future renewable energy pathways will impact nature and society," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    13. P. Senthil Kumar & R. Jahir Hussain, 2016. "A Simple Method for Solving Fully Intuitionistic Fuzzy Real Life Assignment Problem," International Journal of Operations Research and Information Systems (IJORIS), IGI Global, vol. 7(2), pages 39-61, April.
    14. Caplin, Andrew & Leahy, John, 2020. "Comparative statics in markets for indivisible goods," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 80-94.
    15. Biró, Péter & Gudmundsson, Jens, 2021. "Complexity of finding Pareto-efficient allocations of highest welfare," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 614-628.
    16. Sallam, Gamal & Baroudi, Uthman, 2020. "A two-stage framework for fair autonomous robot deployment using virtual forces," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 35-50.
    17. Péter Biró & Flip Klijn & Xenia Klimentova & Ana Viana, 2021. "Shapley-Scarf Housing Markets: Respecting Improvement, Integer Programming, and Kidney Exchange," Working Papers 1235, Barcelona School of Economics.
    18. Michal Brylinski, 2014. "eMatchSite: Sequence Order-Independent Structure Alignments of Ligand Binding Pockets in Protein Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    19. Chiwei Yan & Helin Zhu & Nikita Korolko & Dawn Woodard, 2020. "Dynamic pricing and matching in ride‐hailing platforms," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(8), pages 705-724, December.
    20. Fanrong Xie & Anuj Sharma & Zuoan Li, 2022. "An alternate approach to solve two-level priority based assignment problem," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 613-656, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:13:p:2934-:d:1183633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.