IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i9p1504-d807109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Deep Neural Network Approach to Solving for Seal’s Type Partial Integro-Differential Equation

Author

Listed:
  • Bihao Su

    (School of Mathematics, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Chenglong Xu

    (School of Mathematics, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Jingchao Li

    (College of Mathematics and Statistics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
    Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Advanced Machine Learning and Applications, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

Abstract

In this paper, we study the problem of solving Seal’s type partial integro-differential equations (PIDEs) for the classical compound Poisson risk model. A data-driven deep neural network (DNN) method is proposed to calculate finite-time survival probability, and an alternative scheme is also investigated when claim payments are exponentially distributed. The DNN method is then extended to the numerical solution of generalized PIDEs. Numerical approximation results under different claim distributions are given, which show that the proposed scheme can obtain accurate results under different claim distributions.

Suggested Citation

  • Bihao Su & Chenglong Xu & Jingchao Li, 2022. "A Deep Neural Network Approach to Solving for Seal’s Type Partial Integro-Differential Equation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:9:p:1504-:d:807109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/9/1504/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/9/1504/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dickson, David C. M. & Waters, Howard R., 1999. "Ruin probabilities with compounding assets," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 49-62, September.
    2. De Vylder, F. Etienne & Goovaerts, Marc J., 1999. "Explicit finite-time and infinite-time ruin probabilities in the continuous case," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 155-172, May.
    3. Drekic, Steve & Willmot, Gordon E., 2003. "On the Density and Moments of the Time of Ruin with Exponential Claims," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(1), pages 11-21, May.
    4. Stéphane Loisel & Claude Lefèvre, 2009. "Finite-Time Ruin Probabilities for Discrete, Possibly Dependent, Claim Severities," Post-Print hal-00201377, HAL.
    5. Claude Lefèvre & Stéphane Loisel, 2009. "Finite-Time Ruin Probabilities for Discrete, Possibly Dependent, Claim Severities," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 425-441, September.
    6. Blanka Horvath & Aitor Muguruza & Mehdi Tomas, 2021. "Deep learning volatility: a deep neural network perspective on pricing and calibration in (rough) volatility models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 11-27, January.
    7. Chen, Mi & Yuen, Kam Chuen & Guo, Junyi, 2014. "Survival probabilities in a discrete semi-Markov risk model," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 205-215.
    8. Dickson, David C.M., 2012. "The joint distribution of the time to ruin and the number of claims until ruin in the classical risk model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 334-337.
    9. Avram, Florin & Usabel, Miguel, 2003. "Finite time ruin probabilities with one Laplace inversion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 371-377, July.
    10. Li, Shuanming & Lu, Yi, 2017. "Distributional study of finite-time ruin related problems for the classical risk model," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 315(C), pages 319-330.
    11. Dickson, David C.M. & Willmot, Gordon E., 2005. "The Density of the Time to Ruin in the Classical Poisson Risk Model," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 45-60, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yi Lu, 2016. "On the Evaluation of Expected Penalties at Claim Instants That Cause Ruin in the Classical Risk Model," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 237-255, March.
    2. Andrius Grigutis & Jonas Šiaulys, 2020. "Ultimate Time Survival Probability in Three-Risk Discrete Time Risk Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-30, January.
    3. Mathieu Bargès & Stéphane Loisel & Xavier Venel, 2011. "On finite-time ruin probabilities with reinsurance cycles influenced by large claims," Post-Print hal-00430178, HAL.
    4. Landriault, David & Li, Bin & Shi, Tianxiang & Xu, Di, 2019. "On the distribution of classic and some exotic ruin times," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 38-45.
    5. Castañer, A. & Claramunt, M.M. & Lefèvre, C., 2013. "Survival probabilities in bivariate risk models, with application to reinsurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 632-642.
    6. Dutang, C. & Lefèvre, C. & Loisel, S., 2013. "On an asymptotic rule A+B/u for ultimate ruin probabilities under dependence by mixing," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 774-785.
    7. Loisel, Stéphane & Mazza, Christian & Rullière, Didier, 2009. "Convergence and asymptotic variance of bootstrapped finite-time ruin probabilities with partly shifted risk processes," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 374-381, December.
    8. Florin Avram & Romain Biard & Christophe Dutang & Stéphane Loisel & Landy Rabehasaina, 2014. "A survey of some recent results on Risk Theory," Post-Print hal-01616178, HAL.
    9. Goffard, Pierre-Olivier & Lefèvre, Claude, 2018. "Duality in ruin problems for ordered risk models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 44-52.
    10. Vaios Dermitzakis & Konstadinos Politis, 2011. "Asymptotics for the Moments of the Time to Ruin for the Compound Poisson Model Perturbed by Diffusion," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 749-761, December.
    11. Lefèvre, Claude & Picard, Philippe, 2011. "A new look at the homogeneous risk model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 512-519.
    12. Dimitrina S. Dimitrova & Zvetan G. Ignatov & Vladimir K. Kaishev, 2017. "On the First Crossing of Two Boundaries by an Order Statistics Risk Process," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-14, August.
    13. Claude Lefèvre & Philippe Picard, 2014. "Ruin Probabilities for Risk Models with Ordered Claim Arrivals," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 885-905, December.
    14. Wong, Jeff T.Y. & Cheung, Eric C.K., 2015. "On the time value of Parisian ruin in (dual) renewal risk processes with exponential jumps," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 280-290.
    15. Pierre-Olivier Goffard, 2019. "Fraud risk assessment within blockchain transactions," Working Papers hal-01716687, HAL.
    16. Dickson, David C.M. & Li, Shuanming, 2010. "Finite time ruin problems for the Erlang(2) risk model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 12-18, February.
    17. Dimitrina S. Dimitrova & Zvetan G. Ignatov & Vladimir K. Kaishev, 2019. "Ruin and Deficit Under Claim Arrivals with the Order Statistics Property," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 511-530, June.
    18. Willmot, Gordon E., 2015. "On a partial integrodifferential equation of Seal’s type," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 54-61.
    19. Lee, Wing Yan & Li, Xiaolong & Liu, Fangda & Shi, Yifan & Yam, Sheung Chi Phillip, 2021. "A Fourier-cosine method for finite-time ruin probabilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 256-267.
    20. Landriault, David & Shi, Tianxiang & Willmot, Gordon E., 2011. "Joint densities involving the time to ruin in the Sparre Andersen risk model under exponential assumptions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 371-379.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:9:p:1504-:d:807109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.