IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v7y2023i4p87-d1285072.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multi-Stage Approach for External Trucks and Yard Cranes Scheduling with CO 2 Emissions Considerations in Container Terminals

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Talaat

    (Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology, Alexandria 21934, Egypt
    Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra, Benha University, Cairo 13518, Egypt)

  • Mohamed Gheith

    (Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology, Alexandria 21934, Egypt
    Production Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21544, Egypt)

  • Amr Eltawil

    (Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology, Alexandria 21934, Egypt
    Production Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21544, Egypt)

Abstract

Background : In container terminals, optimizing the scheduling of external trucks and yard cranes is crucial as it directly impacts the truck turnaround time, which is one of the most critical performance measures. Furthermore, proper scheduling of external trucks contributes to reducing CO 2 emissions. Methods : This paper proposes a new approach based on a mixed integer programming model to schedule external trucks and yard cranes with the objective of minimizing CO 2 emissions and reducing truck turnaround time, the gap between trucking companies’ preferred arrival time and appointed time, and the energy consumption of yard cranes. The proposed approach combines data analysis and operations research techniques. Specifically, it employs a K-means clustering algorithm to reduce the number of necessary truck trips for container handling. Additionally, a two-stage mathematical model is applied. The first stage employs a bi-objective mathematical model to plan the arrival of external trucks at the terminal gates. The second stage involves a mathematical model that schedules yard cranes’ movements between different yard blocks. Results : The results show that implementing this methodology in a hypothetical case study may lead to a substantial daily reduction of approximately 31% in CO 2 emissions. Additionally, the results provide valuable insights into the trade-off between satisfying the trucking companies’ preferred arrival time and the total turnaround time. Conclusions : The integration of data clustering with mathematical modeling demonstrates a notable reduction in emissions, underscoring the viability of this strategy in promoting sustainability in port-related activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Talaat & Mohamed Gheith & Amr Eltawil, 2023. "A Multi-Stage Approach for External Trucks and Yard Cranes Scheduling with CO 2 Emissions Considerations in Container Terminals," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:7:y:2023:i:4:p:87-:d:1285072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/7/4/87/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/7/4/87/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmed Mohssen Abdelmagid & Mohamed Samir Gheith & Amr Bahgat Eltawil, 2022. "A comprehensive review of the truck appointment scheduling models and directions for future research," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 102-126, January.
    2. Torkjazi, Mohammad & Huynh, Nathan & Shiri, Samaneh, 2018. "Truck appointment systems considering impact to drayage truck tours," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 208-228.
    3. Galle, Virgile & Barnhart, Cynthia & Jaillet, Patrick, 2018. "Yard Crane Scheduling for container storage, retrieval, and relocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 288-316.
    4. Kai Yu & Jingcheng Yang, 2019. "MILP Model and a Rolling Horizon Algorithm for Crane Scheduling in a Hybrid Storage Container Terminal," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-16, January.
    5. Mar-Ortiz, Julio & Castillo-García, Norberto & Gracia, María D., 2020. "A decision support system for a capacity management problem at a container terminal," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    6. Shell Ying Huang & Ya Li, 2017. "Yard crane scheduling to minimize total weighted vessel loading time in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 689-720, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lange, Ann-Kathrin & Nellen, Nicole & Jahn, Carlos, 2022. "Truck appointment systems: How can they be improved and what are their limits?," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Jahn, Carlos & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Changing Tides: The New Role of Resilience and Sustainability in Logistics and Supply Chain Management – Innovative Approaches for the Shift to a New , volume 33, pages 615-655, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    2. Lange, Ann-Kathrin & Kreuz, Felix & Langkau, Sven & Jahn, Carlos & Clausen, Uwe, 2020. "Defining the quota of truck appointment systems," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferen, volume 30, pages 211-246, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    3. Roy, Debjit & van Ommeren, Jan-Kees & de Koster, René & Gharehgozli, Amir, 2022. "Modeling landside container terminal queues: Exact analysis and approximations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 73-102.
    4. Azab, Ahmed & Morita, Hiroshi, 2022. "The block relocation problem with appointment scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 680-694.
    5. Ahmed M. Abdelmagid & Mohamed Gheith & Amr Eltawil, 2022. "Scheduling External Trucks Appointments in Container Terminals to Minimize Cost and Truck Turnaround Times," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Vallada, Eva & Belenguer, Jose Manuel & Villa, Fulgencia & Alvarez-Valdes, Ramon, 2023. "Models and algorithms for a yard crane scheduling problem in container ports," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 910-924.
    7. Mohammad Torkjazi & Nathan Huynh & Ali Asadabadi, 2022. "Modeling the Truck Appointment System as a Multi-Player Game," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-25, July.
    8. Azab, Ahmed & Morita, Hiroshi, 2022. "Coordinating truck appointments with container relocations and retrievals in container terminals under partial appointments information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    9. Raeesi, Ramin & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2023. "The synergistic effect of operational research and big data analytics in greening container terminal operations: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 943-973.
    10. Mohammad Torkjazi & Nathan Huynh, 2019. "Effectiveness of Dynamic Insertion Scheduling Strategy for Demand-Responsive Paratransit Vehicles Using Agent-Based Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-12, September.
    11. Lennart Zey & Dirk Briskorn & Nils Boysen, 2022. "Twin-crane scheduling during seaside workload peaks with a dedicated handshake area," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 3-34, February.
    12. Sumin Chen & Qingcheng Zeng & Yushan Hu, 2022. "Scheduling optimization for two crossover automated stacking cranes considering relocation," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2099-2120, July.
    13. Chen, Rui & Meng, Qiang & Jia, Peng, 2022. "Container port drayage operations and management: Past and future," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    14. Mar-Ortiz, Julio & Castillo-García, Norberto & Gracia, María D., 2020. "A decision support system for a capacity management problem at a container terminal," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    15. Fan, Tijun & Pan, Qianlan & Pan, Fei & Zhou, Wei & Chen, Jingyi, 2020. "Intelligent logistics integration of internal and external transportation with separation mode," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    16. Damla Kizilay & Deniz Türsel Eliiyi, 2021. "A comprehensive review of quay crane scheduling, yard operations and integrations thereof in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-42, March.
    17. Li, Dongjun & Dong, Jing-Xin & Song, Dong-Ping & Hicks, Christian & Singh, Surya Prakash, 2020. "Optimal contract design for the exchange of tradable truck permits at multiterminal ports," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    18. Afef Lagha & Bechir Ben Daya & Jean-François Audy, 2024. "Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Heavy-Duty Trucking in a Non-Containerized Port through Simulation-Based Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-27, February.
    19. Wu, Lingxiao & Jia, Shuai & Wang, Shuaian, 2020. "Pilotage planning in seaports," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 90-105.
    20. Bajomo, Mary & Ogbeyemi, Akinola & Zhang, Wenjun, 2022. "A systems dynamics approach to the management of material procurement for Engineering, Procurement and Construction industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:7:y:2023:i:4:p:87-:d:1285072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.