IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v4y2015i3p352-376d53319.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulating Gamete Donation in the U.S.: Ethical, Legal and Social Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Maya Sabatello

    (Center for Research on Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Psychiatric, Neurologic & Behavioral Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, USA)

Abstract

This article explores the practice of gamete donation in the U.S. having in mind the larger question of what do we as a society owe children born as a result (donor-conceived children). Do recipient-parents have a duty to tell their donor-conceived child about his/her genetic origins? Should the identity of the donor be disclosed or remain anonymous? Does the child have a right to know her conception story and to receive information, including identifying information, about the donor? Furthermore, if a donor-conceived child has a right to know, who has the duty to tell her/him about it? The Article underscores the ethical, legal and social dilemmas that arise, comparing and contrasting with international developments in this arena. It highlights the market-based and more specific medical justifications for regulating this field, explores the emerging so-called right of the child to know his/her genetic origins (“the right to know”), and considers the challenges such a right evokes to existing legal culture and principles of medical ethics in the U.S. as well as other broader societal implications of such a right.

Suggested Citation

  • Maya Sabatello, 2015. "Regulating Gamete Donation in the U.S.: Ethical, Legal and Social Implications," Laws, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-25, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:4:y:2015:i:3:p:352-376:d:53319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/4/3/352/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/4/3/352/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Inhorn, Marcia C., 2003. "Global infertility and the globalization of new reproductive technologies: illustrations from Egypt," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 56(9), pages 1837-1851, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moghimehfar, Farhad & Nasr-Esfahani, Mohammad Hossein, 2011. "Decisive factors in medical tourism destination choice: A case study of Isfahan, Iran and fertility treatments," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1431-1434.
    2. Wolf, Meike, 2015. "Is there really such a thing as “one health”? Thinking about a more than human world from the perspective of cultural anthropology," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 5-11.
    3. Hough, Carolyn A., 2010. "Loss in childbearing among Gambia's kanyalengs: Using a stratified reproduction framework to expand the scope of sexual and reproductive health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(10), pages 1757-1763, November.
    4. Gooldin, Sigal, 2013. "‘Emotional rights’, moral reasoning, and Jewish–Arab alliances in the regulation of in-vitro-fertilization in Israel: Theorizing the unexpected consequences of assisted reproductive technologies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 90-98.
    5. Jacek Klich, 2008. "Globalizacja usług zdrowotnych," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 4, pages 21-40.
    6. Yount, Kathryn M. & Dijkerman, Sally & Zureick-Brown, Sarah & VanderEnde, Kristin E., 2014. "Women's empowerment and generalized anxiety in Minya, Egypt," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 185-193.
    7. Sahawal Alidou & Marijke Verpoorten, 2019. "Family size and schooling in sub-Saharan Africa: testing the quantity-quality trade-off," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 1353-1399, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:4:y:2015:i:3:p:352-376:d:53319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.